{"title":"平衡计分卡实施中的成功因素-文献综述","authors":"R. Lueg, Louisa Vu","doi":"10.5771/0935-9915-2015-4-306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses Buchanan et al.’s (2005) framework of change to systematically synthesize the empirical literature on the implementation processes of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC). We specifically examine which critical success factors (CSFs) have been neglected so far, but may play a substantial role in improving BSC implementations. While some CSFs are intuitive (such as top management support), others seem to be overrated by the conceptual literature (e.g., the speed of the implementation). Most importantly, the BSC literature has some blind spots that relate to cost-benefit analyses of the BSC, the impacts of management skills and leadership, power and politics, organizational culture, and public discourse.","PeriodicalId":422075,"journal":{"name":"management revue. Socio-economic Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Success factors in Balanced Scorecard implementations – A literature review\",\"authors\":\"R. Lueg, Louisa Vu\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/0935-9915-2015-4-306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses Buchanan et al.’s (2005) framework of change to systematically synthesize the empirical literature on the implementation processes of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC). We specifically examine which critical success factors (CSFs) have been neglected so far, but may play a substantial role in improving BSC implementations. While some CSFs are intuitive (such as top management support), others seem to be overrated by the conceptual literature (e.g., the speed of the implementation). Most importantly, the BSC literature has some blind spots that relate to cost-benefit analyses of the BSC, the impacts of management skills and leadership, power and politics, organizational culture, and public discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"management revue. Socio-economic Studies\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"management revue. Socio-economic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2015-4-306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"management revue. Socio-economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2015-4-306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
摘要
本文采用Buchanan et al.(2005)的变革框架,对平衡计分卡(BSC)实施过程的实证文献进行系统综合。我们特别研究了哪些关键成功因素(csf)迄今为止被忽视,但可能在改善平衡记分卡实施中发挥重要作用。虽然一些csf是直观的(例如最高管理层的支持),但其他csf似乎被概念性文献高估了(例如,实现的速度)。最重要的是,平衡计分卡文献存在一些盲点,这些盲点与平衡计分卡的成本效益分析、管理技能和领导力的影响、权力和政治、组织文化和公共话语有关。
Success factors in Balanced Scorecard implementations – A literature review
This paper uses Buchanan et al.’s (2005) framework of change to systematically synthesize the empirical literature on the implementation processes of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC). We specifically examine which critical success factors (CSFs) have been neglected so far, but may play a substantial role in improving BSC implementations. While some CSFs are intuitive (such as top management support), others seem to be overrated by the conceptual literature (e.g., the speed of the implementation). Most importantly, the BSC literature has some blind spots that relate to cost-benefit analyses of the BSC, the impacts of management skills and leadership, power and politics, organizational culture, and public discourse.