肯尼亚梅鲁县蒂加尼亚西部分县家庭卫生习惯评估

Catherine Kendi
{"title":"肯尼亚梅鲁县蒂加尼亚西部分县家庭卫生习惯评估","authors":"Catherine Kendi","doi":"10.58506/ajstss.v1i1.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A poorly constructed toilet may deter its use and provoke open defecation. Globally, 2.5 billion people do not have access to improved sanitation facilities. In Kenya, over 5 million people are forced to defecate in the open due to inadequate or lack of sanitation facilities resulting in high prevalence of water, sanitation and hygiene-related diseases such diarrhea. This study therefore sought to profile the sanitation practices on containment and disposal systems among households in Tigania West with a view of yielding insights on promotion of safe disposal of human waste. Questionnaires, interview guide and observations were used to collect data in a mixed study design. Cluster sampling technique was employed to select respondents and the data analyzed using SPSS version 21.0. The results showed that 95.2% of the respondents had access to a toilet, whereas 4.8% did not (n=236). Out of those with toilets (n=225), 54.3% had pit latrines without a slab. With regard to construction materials, 72% of the households had their latrines constructed using timber and iron sheet; 9.3% with concrete; 8.4% with mud and grass; whereas 10.3% had theirs constructed with polythene materials (n=225). The majority of the households had toilets in poor hygienic conditions with 149 (66%) with faeces on the floor, exposing users to the risk of getting into contact with the faeces. 120 (53.2%) of the households did not empty latrines when full, instead they opted for a new one. Latrines did not offer any privacy in 45 (20%) of the households, therefore discouraging their use. 71.8% of households disposed of children’s faeces in the latrine, whereas 6.4% did so in the environment (n=225). 53.2% (n=225) of the residents had no detergents and disinfectant to clean the toilet. 37.7% (236) of the respondents never washed their hands with soap and water after using the latrine/defecating in the open. Sanitation practices had a significant positive correlation with cultural practices (0.119 (p=0.003<0.05), sharing of toilets (0.142; p=0.48<0.05), space availability in the household (0.098; p=0.011<0.005) and financial challenges (0.074; p=0.004<0.005). Innovative approaches to toilet construction using locally available materials, training and subsidies together with behavioral change sensitization could improve sanitation among households of Tigania West Sub-County. \n ","PeriodicalId":440319,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Science, Technology and Social Sciences","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of sanitation practices among households of Tigania West sub-county, Meru county, Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Kendi\",\"doi\":\"10.58506/ajstss.v1i1.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A poorly constructed toilet may deter its use and provoke open defecation. Globally, 2.5 billion people do not have access to improved sanitation facilities. In Kenya, over 5 million people are forced to defecate in the open due to inadequate or lack of sanitation facilities resulting in high prevalence of water, sanitation and hygiene-related diseases such diarrhea. This study therefore sought to profile the sanitation practices on containment and disposal systems among households in Tigania West with a view of yielding insights on promotion of safe disposal of human waste. Questionnaires, interview guide and observations were used to collect data in a mixed study design. Cluster sampling technique was employed to select respondents and the data analyzed using SPSS version 21.0. The results showed that 95.2% of the respondents had access to a toilet, whereas 4.8% did not (n=236). Out of those with toilets (n=225), 54.3% had pit latrines without a slab. With regard to construction materials, 72% of the households had their latrines constructed using timber and iron sheet; 9.3% with concrete; 8.4% with mud and grass; whereas 10.3% had theirs constructed with polythene materials (n=225). The majority of the households had toilets in poor hygienic conditions with 149 (66%) with faeces on the floor, exposing users to the risk of getting into contact with the faeces. 120 (53.2%) of the households did not empty latrines when full, instead they opted for a new one. Latrines did not offer any privacy in 45 (20%) of the households, therefore discouraging their use. 71.8% of households disposed of children’s faeces in the latrine, whereas 6.4% did so in the environment (n=225). 53.2% (n=225) of the residents had no detergents and disinfectant to clean the toilet. 37.7% (236) of the respondents never washed their hands with soap and water after using the latrine/defecating in the open. Sanitation practices had a significant positive correlation with cultural practices (0.119 (p=0.003<0.05), sharing of toilets (0.142; p=0.48<0.05), space availability in the household (0.098; p=0.011<0.005) and financial challenges (0.074; p=0.004<0.005). Innovative approaches to toilet construction using locally available materials, training and subsidies together with behavioral change sensitization could improve sanitation among households of Tigania West Sub-County. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":440319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Science, Technology and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Science, Technology and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58506/ajstss.v1i1.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Science, Technology and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58506/ajstss.v1i1.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建造不良的厕所可能会阻碍其使用并引起露天排便。全球有25亿人无法获得改善的卫生设施。在肯尼亚,由于卫生设施不足或缺乏,500多万人被迫露天排便,导致腹泻等与水、环境卫生和个人卫生有关的疾病高发。因此,本研究试图概述西蒂加尼亚家庭中有关收容和处置系统的卫生做法,以期对促进安全处置人类废物提供见解。采用问卷调查法、访谈法和观察法收集数据,采用混合研究设计。采用整群抽样方法选取调查对象,数据分析采用SPSS 21.0版本。结果显示,95.2%的受访者有厕所,4.8%的受访者没有厕所(n=236)。在有厕所的人中(n=225), 54.3%的人有没有板的坑式厕所。在建筑材料方面,72%的家庭使用木材和铁皮建造厕所;9.3%掺混凝土;8.4%为泥和草;而10.3%的人用聚乙烯材料建造(n=225)。大多数家庭的厕所卫生条件较差,149户(66%)的厕所地板上有粪便,使使用者面临与粪便接触的风险。120户(53.2%)家庭在厕所满了时不清空,而是选择使用新厕所。45个(20%)家庭没有提供任何隐私,因此不鼓励使用厕所。71.8%的家庭在厕所处理儿童粪便,而6.4%的家庭在环境中处理儿童粪便(n=225)。53.2% (n=225)的居民没有清洁厕所的清洁剂和消毒剂。37.7%(236人)的受访者在使用厕所或露天排便后从未用肥皂和水洗手。卫生习惯与文化习惯呈显著正相关(0.119 (p=0.003<0.05)),共用厕所(0.142;P =0.48<0.05),家庭空间利用率(0.098;P =0.011<0.005)和财务挑战(0.074;p = 0.004 < 0.005)。利用当地可获得的材料、培训和补贴以及行为改变敏感化来建设厕所的创新方法可以改善蒂加尼亚西部副县家庭的卫生状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of sanitation practices among households of Tigania West sub-county, Meru county, Kenya
A poorly constructed toilet may deter its use and provoke open defecation. Globally, 2.5 billion people do not have access to improved sanitation facilities. In Kenya, over 5 million people are forced to defecate in the open due to inadequate or lack of sanitation facilities resulting in high prevalence of water, sanitation and hygiene-related diseases such diarrhea. This study therefore sought to profile the sanitation practices on containment and disposal systems among households in Tigania West with a view of yielding insights on promotion of safe disposal of human waste. Questionnaires, interview guide and observations were used to collect data in a mixed study design. Cluster sampling technique was employed to select respondents and the data analyzed using SPSS version 21.0. The results showed that 95.2% of the respondents had access to a toilet, whereas 4.8% did not (n=236). Out of those with toilets (n=225), 54.3% had pit latrines without a slab. With regard to construction materials, 72% of the households had their latrines constructed using timber and iron sheet; 9.3% with concrete; 8.4% with mud and grass; whereas 10.3% had theirs constructed with polythene materials (n=225). The majority of the households had toilets in poor hygienic conditions with 149 (66%) with faeces on the floor, exposing users to the risk of getting into contact with the faeces. 120 (53.2%) of the households did not empty latrines when full, instead they opted for a new one. Latrines did not offer any privacy in 45 (20%) of the households, therefore discouraging their use. 71.8% of households disposed of children’s faeces in the latrine, whereas 6.4% did so in the environment (n=225). 53.2% (n=225) of the residents had no detergents and disinfectant to clean the toilet. 37.7% (236) of the respondents never washed their hands with soap and water after using the latrine/defecating in the open. Sanitation practices had a significant positive correlation with cultural practices (0.119 (p=0.003<0.05), sharing of toilets (0.142; p=0.48<0.05), space availability in the household (0.098; p=0.011<0.005) and financial challenges (0.074; p=0.004<0.005). Innovative approaches to toilet construction using locally available materials, training and subsidies together with behavioral change sensitization could improve sanitation among households of Tigania West Sub-County.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信