跨人类健康和环境的协同决策和干预:设计传染病模型的概念

J. Stanhope, H. Mayfield, J. Guillaume, O. Sahin, P. Weinstein, C. Lau
{"title":"跨人类健康和环境的协同决策和干预:设计传染病模型的概念","authors":"J. Stanhope, H. Mayfield, J. Guillaume, O. Sahin, P. Weinstein, C. Lau","doi":"10.18174/sesmo.18126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of environmental factors on human health outcomes is well established. It is therefore not surprising that interventions aimed at improving human health are often environmental-based, such as restoring riparian vegetation for flood mitigation, with a view to reducing associated infectious disease transmission. Yet the risks and benefits of these interventions on the environment itself are rarely measured, or weighed up against potential health gains. One of the challenges with such an evaluation is the requirement for cross-sectoral support from decision makers in both the health and environmental sectors. To facilitate this support, cross-sectoral models are required that simultaneously estimate the impact of proposed environmental interventions on both sectors. Despite their obvious value, a systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature did not identify any model that concurrently models the impact of environmental intervention on both environmental and human infectious disease related outcomes. In this paper, we conceptually explore potential approaches for designing such a model, using leptospirosis as a case study to highlight the various data sources, spatial scales, temporal scales and required system behaviour that would need to be integrated for a cross-sectoral model of this complexity. By comparing these system requirements against the strengths and limitations of individual modelling techniques, we demonstrate the potential benefits of a hybrid-ensemble approach that uses component models from different frameworks.  By combining the strengths of the different techniques to tackle this wicked problem, such a modelling approach supports the prioritisation of environmental interventions that optimise the overall benefit by considering impacts on both human health and the environment.","PeriodicalId":166291,"journal":{"name":"Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergising decision making and interventions across human health and environment: concepts for designing a model for infectious diseases\",\"authors\":\"J. Stanhope, H. Mayfield, J. Guillaume, O. Sahin, P. Weinstein, C. Lau\",\"doi\":\"10.18174/sesmo.18126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The impact of environmental factors on human health outcomes is well established. It is therefore not surprising that interventions aimed at improving human health are often environmental-based, such as restoring riparian vegetation for flood mitigation, with a view to reducing associated infectious disease transmission. Yet the risks and benefits of these interventions on the environment itself are rarely measured, or weighed up against potential health gains. One of the challenges with such an evaluation is the requirement for cross-sectoral support from decision makers in both the health and environmental sectors. To facilitate this support, cross-sectoral models are required that simultaneously estimate the impact of proposed environmental interventions on both sectors. Despite their obvious value, a systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature did not identify any model that concurrently models the impact of environmental intervention on both environmental and human infectious disease related outcomes. In this paper, we conceptually explore potential approaches for designing such a model, using leptospirosis as a case study to highlight the various data sources, spatial scales, temporal scales and required system behaviour that would need to be integrated for a cross-sectoral model of this complexity. By comparing these system requirements against the strengths and limitations of individual modelling techniques, we demonstrate the potential benefits of a hybrid-ensemble approach that uses component models from different frameworks.  By combining the strengths of the different techniques to tackle this wicked problem, such a modelling approach supports the prioritisation of environmental interventions that optimise the overall benefit by considering impacts on both human health and the environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18174/sesmo.18126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18174/sesmo.18126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

环境因素对人类健康结果的影响是公认的。因此,旨在改善人类健康的干预措施往往是基于环境的,例如恢复河岸植被以减轻洪水,以减少相关的传染病传播,这并不奇怪。然而,这些干预措施对环境本身的风险和益处很少得到衡量,也很少与潜在的健康收益进行权衡。这种评价面临的挑战之一是需要卫生和环境部门的决策者提供跨部门的支持。为了促进这种支持,需要建立跨部门模型,同时估计拟议的环境干预措施对两个部门的影响。尽管它们具有明显的价值,但对同行评议文献的系统搜索并没有发现任何模型可以同时模拟环境干预对环境和人类传染病相关结果的影响。在本文中,我们从概念上探索了设计这样一个模型的潜在方法,以钩端螺旋体病为例研究,以突出各种数据源、空间尺度、时间尺度和所需的系统行为,这些都需要集成到这种复杂性的跨部门模型中。通过将这些系统需求与单个建模技术的优势和局限性进行比较,我们展示了使用来自不同框架的组件模型的混合集成方法的潜在好处。通过结合不同技术的优势来解决这个棘手的问题,这种建模方法支持环境干预的优先次序,通过考虑对人类健康和环境的影响来优化总体效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synergising decision making and interventions across human health and environment: concepts for designing a model for infectious diseases
The impact of environmental factors on human health outcomes is well established. It is therefore not surprising that interventions aimed at improving human health are often environmental-based, such as restoring riparian vegetation for flood mitigation, with a view to reducing associated infectious disease transmission. Yet the risks and benefits of these interventions on the environment itself are rarely measured, or weighed up against potential health gains. One of the challenges with such an evaluation is the requirement for cross-sectoral support from decision makers in both the health and environmental sectors. To facilitate this support, cross-sectoral models are required that simultaneously estimate the impact of proposed environmental interventions on both sectors. Despite their obvious value, a systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature did not identify any model that concurrently models the impact of environmental intervention on both environmental and human infectious disease related outcomes. In this paper, we conceptually explore potential approaches for designing such a model, using leptospirosis as a case study to highlight the various data sources, spatial scales, temporal scales and required system behaviour that would need to be integrated for a cross-sectoral model of this complexity. By comparing these system requirements against the strengths and limitations of individual modelling techniques, we demonstrate the potential benefits of a hybrid-ensemble approach that uses component models from different frameworks.  By combining the strengths of the different techniques to tackle this wicked problem, such a modelling approach supports the prioritisation of environmental interventions that optimise the overall benefit by considering impacts on both human health and the environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信