Vitalija Rudzkiene, M. Černikovaitė
{"title":"Socialinio teisingumo suvokimas : piliečių ir vartotojų vertybiniai skirtumai","authors":"Vitalija Rudzkiene, M. Černikovaitė","doi":"10.13165/SMS-13-5-3-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The changes in modern welfare states engendered by globalization, social needs and environmental issues evoke the question of the social bases of support of the modern welfare state system. Although socially just sustainable society is the main value and the general purpose of social development, the concept of a model for the ideal society accepted by some groups of different ideologies and different levels of development significantly differs. The research on social values in the scientific literature indicates the two social groups, citizens and consumers, having the sharpest contrasts in social value systems. This difference between these groups derives from two distinct ideologies and distinct value systems. By searching for the answer how the differences of these groups impact the perception of social justice values, which is crucial for a long term socio-economic development, the authors developed a theoretical framework, which outlines the structural relationship between the social attributes, principles of justice and individual preferences. Using data from a recent representative populationbased survey on attitudes about social justice, conducted in Lithuania in 2013 (N=1050), the authors of the article tested a number of assumptions and theoretical hypothesis. The findings revealed three different sets of respondents with distinct value preferences and collectivistic attitudes. The authors also found that these groups have significant differences not only in evaluating the factors that determine the income of the people, but also in the trust in government, participation in decision making, etc. The results allowed to distinguish characteristic features and social justice attitudes of the groups and to create the attribute sets. Prepared according to the scientific project financed by LSC SIN-12005 “Guidelines for Forming Social Justice Perception of Citizens and Customers”.","PeriodicalId":256611,"journal":{"name":"Societal Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/SMS-13-5-3-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球化、社会需求和环境问题导致的现代福利国家的变化引发了现代福利国家制度支持的社会基础问题。虽然社会公正的可持续社会是社会发展的主要价值和总体目标,但不同意识形态和不同发展水平的群体所接受的理想社会模式的概念存在显著差异。科学文献对社会价值观的研究表明,公民和消费者这两个社会群体在社会价值体系上存在着最明显的差异。这些群体之间的差异源于两种不同的意识形态和不同的价值体系。通过寻找这些群体的差异如何影响对长期社会经济发展至关重要的社会正义价值观的看法的答案,作者开发了一个理论框架,概述了社会属性,正义原则和个人偏好之间的结构关系。利用2013年在立陶宛进行的一项具有代表性的基于人口的社会正义态度调查(N=1050)的数据,文章的作者测试了一些假设和理论假设。调查结果显示,三组不同的受访者具有不同的价值偏好和集体主义态度。作者还发现,这些群体不仅在评估决定人民收入的因素方面存在显著差异,而且在对政府的信任、参与决策等方面也存在显著差异。结果可以区分群体的特征特征和社会公正态度,并创建属性集。根据LSC SIN-12005资助的科学项目“公民和消费者形成社会正义感的指南”编写。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socialinio teisingumo suvokimas : piliečių ir vartotojų vertybiniai skirtumai
The changes in modern welfare states engendered by globalization, social needs and environmental issues evoke the question of the social bases of support of the modern welfare state system. Although socially just sustainable society is the main value and the general purpose of social development, the concept of a model for the ideal society accepted by some groups of different ideologies and different levels of development significantly differs. The research on social values in the scientific literature indicates the two social groups, citizens and consumers, having the sharpest contrasts in social value systems. This difference between these groups derives from two distinct ideologies and distinct value systems. By searching for the answer how the differences of these groups impact the perception of social justice values, which is crucial for a long term socio-economic development, the authors developed a theoretical framework, which outlines the structural relationship between the social attributes, principles of justice and individual preferences. Using data from a recent representative populationbased survey on attitudes about social justice, conducted in Lithuania in 2013 (N=1050), the authors of the article tested a number of assumptions and theoretical hypothesis. The findings revealed three different sets of respondents with distinct value preferences and collectivistic attitudes. The authors also found that these groups have significant differences not only in evaluating the factors that determine the income of the people, but also in the trust in government, participation in decision making, etc. The results allowed to distinguish characteristic features and social justice attitudes of the groups and to create the attribute sets. Prepared according to the scientific project financed by LSC SIN-12005 “Guidelines for Forming Social Justice Perception of Citizens and Customers”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信