基于场景的城市自动导向交通系统STPA分析

Fei Yan, T. Tang, Hong-wei Yan
{"title":"基于场景的城市自动导向交通系统STPA分析","authors":"Fei Yan, T. Tang, Hong-wei Yan","doi":"10.1109/ICIRT.2016.7588764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beijing Metro plans to open an Automated Urban Guided Transport (AUGT) Line at the end of 2017. The line will follow GOA4 requirements according to IEC62290-2014 and IEC62267-2009. The main difference between the AUGT line and existing line is no driver or attended people on the train. The system will realize the following functions: Ensure safety movement, Driving Supervising guideway, supervising passenger transfer, Operating a train and Ensuring detection and management of emergency situations. Traditionally, HAZOP (Hazard Operability analysis) or FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) method will be used to do the hazard analysis. But the main challenge is that most of human operation and behavior are replaced by equipment in AUGT and it is very difficult to deal with emergency condition. Finally, an operational scenario based method has been used to do hazard analysis which combined with STPA (Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis). As we know, STPA is a systematic analysis method from the view of safety control and it is good at human related error and management related analysis. In this paper, STPA has been used to compare with traditional method. The conclusions are: 1) STPA is more focusing on the safety related interaction and we can easily find the main clue by safety constraints compared to HAZOP; 2) Process Model Analysis should be done in each of scenario in order to find detail safety control measures; 3) In order to identify what could cause the unsafe control action or how control actions may not be executed properly, we also can use low layer control process model to do STPA analysis if we find it is still complex. We can regard this means as nested control process model.","PeriodicalId":427580,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scenario based STPA analysis in Automated Urban Guided Transport system\",\"authors\":\"Fei Yan, T. Tang, Hong-wei Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIRT.2016.7588764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Beijing Metro plans to open an Automated Urban Guided Transport (AUGT) Line at the end of 2017. The line will follow GOA4 requirements according to IEC62290-2014 and IEC62267-2009. The main difference between the AUGT line and existing line is no driver or attended people on the train. The system will realize the following functions: Ensure safety movement, Driving Supervising guideway, supervising passenger transfer, Operating a train and Ensuring detection and management of emergency situations. Traditionally, HAZOP (Hazard Operability analysis) or FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) method will be used to do the hazard analysis. But the main challenge is that most of human operation and behavior are replaced by equipment in AUGT and it is very difficult to deal with emergency condition. Finally, an operational scenario based method has been used to do hazard analysis which combined with STPA (Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis). As we know, STPA is a systematic analysis method from the view of safety control and it is good at human related error and management related analysis. In this paper, STPA has been used to compare with traditional method. The conclusions are: 1) STPA is more focusing on the safety related interaction and we can easily find the main clue by safety constraints compared to HAZOP; 2) Process Model Analysis should be done in each of scenario in order to find detail safety control measures; 3) In order to identify what could cause the unsafe control action or how control actions may not be executed properly, we also can use low layer control process model to do STPA analysis if we find it is still complex. We can regard this means as nested control process model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIRT.2016.7588764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIRT.2016.7588764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

北京地铁计划在2017年底开通自动城市引导交通(AUGT)线。该生产线将遵循IEC62290-2014和IEC62267-2009的GOA4要求。AUGT线路与现有线路的主要区别在于列车上没有司机或有人值守。该系统将实现以下功能:确保安全运行,驾驶监督导轨,监督乘客换乘,操作列车和确保发现和管理紧急情况。传统上使用HAZOP(危害可操作性分析)或FMEA(失效模式和影响分析)方法进行危害分析。但主要的挑战是,在AUGT中,大部分人的操作和行为被设备所取代,处理紧急情况非常困难。最后,采用基于操作情景的方法,结合系统理论过程分析(STPA)进行了危害分析。众所周知,STPA是一种从安全控制角度出发的系统分析方法,它擅长于人为错误和管理相关的分析。本文将STPA与传统方法进行了比较。结果表明:1)与HAZOP相比,STPA更注重与安全相关的相互作用,通过安全约束更容易找到主要线索;2)对每个场景进行过程模型分析,找出详细的安全控制措施;3)为了确定可能导致不安全控制动作的原因或控制动作可能无法正确执行的原因,如果我们发现它仍然很复杂,我们也可以使用低层控制过程模型进行STPA分析。我们可以把这种方法看作是嵌套控制过程模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scenario based STPA analysis in Automated Urban Guided Transport system
Beijing Metro plans to open an Automated Urban Guided Transport (AUGT) Line at the end of 2017. The line will follow GOA4 requirements according to IEC62290-2014 and IEC62267-2009. The main difference between the AUGT line and existing line is no driver or attended people on the train. The system will realize the following functions: Ensure safety movement, Driving Supervising guideway, supervising passenger transfer, Operating a train and Ensuring detection and management of emergency situations. Traditionally, HAZOP (Hazard Operability analysis) or FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) method will be used to do the hazard analysis. But the main challenge is that most of human operation and behavior are replaced by equipment in AUGT and it is very difficult to deal with emergency condition. Finally, an operational scenario based method has been used to do hazard analysis which combined with STPA (Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis). As we know, STPA is a systematic analysis method from the view of safety control and it is good at human related error and management related analysis. In this paper, STPA has been used to compare with traditional method. The conclusions are: 1) STPA is more focusing on the safety related interaction and we can easily find the main clue by safety constraints compared to HAZOP; 2) Process Model Analysis should be done in each of scenario in order to find detail safety control measures; 3) In order to identify what could cause the unsafe control action or how control actions may not be executed properly, we also can use low layer control process model to do STPA analysis if we find it is still complex. We can regard this means as nested control process model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信