新冠肺炎疫情防控过程中医学前期和基础阶段在线教学情况调查

Gui-ling Feng, Liao Yujing, Xue Shilin, Mengju Chang, Qi Wenxiu, Yi Zhaodi, Liu Meiyao
{"title":"新冠肺炎疫情防控过程中医学前期和基础阶段在线教学情况调查","authors":"Gui-ling Feng, Liao Yujing, Xue Shilin, Mengju Chang, Qi Wenxiu, Yi Zhaodi, Liu Meiyao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115259-20201218-01735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate the online teaching for undergraduates at the pre-medical and basic medicine stage in Peking University Health Science Center during COVID-19 pandemic period and to provide reference for improving the quality of online teaching. Methods Self-designed questionnaire was used in this study. A total of 105 five-year program undergraduates of clinical medicine and eight year program of basic medicine at the education stages of pre-medicine and basic medicine and 10 teachers were selected from February 24 to March 1, 2020.The comparison between online teaching and traditional teaching in terms of strengthens and weakness was implemented. The data were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. Results Compared with the traditional teaching, 37.1% (39/105) of the students and 6 teachers considered that the effect of online teaching was equal to traditional teaching and 39.0% (41/105) of the students and 3 teachers thought that the teacher's in teaching plan document was 125% higher than that in traditional teaching and 35.2% (37/105), 19.1% (20/105), 4.8% (5/105) of the students and 3, 2 and 1 teachers thought that in online teaching environment, the classroom interaction decreased to 75%, 50% and 25% respectively. There was no significant difference between students and teachers in the evaluation of the adequacy of lesson preparation and the effect of classroom interaction (all P > 0.05). Teachers listed three advantages of online teaching as the feasibility of reviewing after class, the teaching time and place were more flexible and the students in different classes were able to join the course simultaneously; Teachers listed three difficulties of online teaching as barrier to implement the training of lab experiment, surgical operation and other clinical skills, the network is sometimes stuck, and students' learning situation were not able to be followed. There were 63.8% (67/105) of the students and 8 teachers thought that online teaching was a complementary pathway for traditional teaching at moment. Conclusions In the online teaching, the teachers are better prepared for the lesson, but the classroom interaction is not as good as that in traditional pathway. The current teaching mode should still be based on traditional pathway and online teaching function as a complementary technology to traditional teaching.","PeriodicalId":427675,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Medical Education","volume":"12 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of online teaching in pre-medical and basic medical phases during the prevention and control of COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Gui-ling Feng, Liao Yujing, Xue Shilin, Mengju Chang, Qi Wenxiu, Yi Zhaodi, Liu Meiyao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115259-20201218-01735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To evaluate the online teaching for undergraduates at the pre-medical and basic medicine stage in Peking University Health Science Center during COVID-19 pandemic period and to provide reference for improving the quality of online teaching. Methods Self-designed questionnaire was used in this study. A total of 105 five-year program undergraduates of clinical medicine and eight year program of basic medicine at the education stages of pre-medicine and basic medicine and 10 teachers were selected from February 24 to March 1, 2020.The comparison between online teaching and traditional teaching in terms of strengthens and weakness was implemented. The data were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. Results Compared with the traditional teaching, 37.1% (39/105) of the students and 6 teachers considered that the effect of online teaching was equal to traditional teaching and 39.0% (41/105) of the students and 3 teachers thought that the teacher's in teaching plan document was 125% higher than that in traditional teaching and 35.2% (37/105), 19.1% (20/105), 4.8% (5/105) of the students and 3, 2 and 1 teachers thought that in online teaching environment, the classroom interaction decreased to 75%, 50% and 25% respectively. There was no significant difference between students and teachers in the evaluation of the adequacy of lesson preparation and the effect of classroom interaction (all P > 0.05). Teachers listed three advantages of online teaching as the feasibility of reviewing after class, the teaching time and place were more flexible and the students in different classes were able to join the course simultaneously; Teachers listed three difficulties of online teaching as barrier to implement the training of lab experiment, surgical operation and other clinical skills, the network is sometimes stuck, and students' learning situation were not able to be followed. There were 63.8% (67/105) of the students and 8 teachers thought that online teaching was a complementary pathway for traditional teaching at moment. Conclusions In the online teaching, the teachers are better prepared for the lesson, but the classroom interaction is not as good as that in traditional pathway. The current teaching mode should still be based on traditional pathway and online teaching function as a complementary technology to traditional teaching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"12 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115259-20201218-01735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115259-20201218-01735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价新冠肺炎大流行期间北京大学医学部预科和基础医学本科在线教学情况,为提高在线教学质量提供参考。方法采用自行设计的调查问卷。2020年2月24日至3月1日,共选拔基础医学和基础医学教育阶段临床医学五年制和基础医学八年制本科生105名,教师10名。对网络教学与传统教学的优缺点进行了比较。这些数据是通过费雪精确检验来分析的。结果与传统教学相比,37.1%(39/105)的学生和6名教师认为网络教学的效果与传统教学相当,39.0%(41/105)的学生和3名教师认为教师的教案文件比传统教学高125%,35.2%(37/105)、19.1%(20/105)、4.8%(5/105)的学生和3名、2名和1名教师认为在网络教学环境下,教师的教学效果与传统教学相当。课堂互动分别下降到75%、50%和25%。学生与教师对备课充分性和课堂互动效果的评价差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。教师们列举了网络教学的三大优势:课后复习的可行性,教学时间和地点更加灵活,不同班级的学生可以同时参加课程;教师列举了网络教学的三大难点,分别是实验室实验、外科手术等临床技能的培训难以实施,网络有时会卡,学生的学习情况无法跟进。63.8%(67/105)的学生和8位教师认为目前网络教学是传统教学的补充途径。结论在网络教学中,教师的备课能力较强,但课堂互动不如传统途径。目前的教学模式仍应以传统途径为主,网络教学功能作为传统教学的补充技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of online teaching in pre-medical and basic medical phases during the prevention and control of COVID-19 pandemic
Objective To evaluate the online teaching for undergraduates at the pre-medical and basic medicine stage in Peking University Health Science Center during COVID-19 pandemic period and to provide reference for improving the quality of online teaching. Methods Self-designed questionnaire was used in this study. A total of 105 five-year program undergraduates of clinical medicine and eight year program of basic medicine at the education stages of pre-medicine and basic medicine and 10 teachers were selected from February 24 to March 1, 2020.The comparison between online teaching and traditional teaching in terms of strengthens and weakness was implemented. The data were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. Results Compared with the traditional teaching, 37.1% (39/105) of the students and 6 teachers considered that the effect of online teaching was equal to traditional teaching and 39.0% (41/105) of the students and 3 teachers thought that the teacher's in teaching plan document was 125% higher than that in traditional teaching and 35.2% (37/105), 19.1% (20/105), 4.8% (5/105) of the students and 3, 2 and 1 teachers thought that in online teaching environment, the classroom interaction decreased to 75%, 50% and 25% respectively. There was no significant difference between students and teachers in the evaluation of the adequacy of lesson preparation and the effect of classroom interaction (all P > 0.05). Teachers listed three advantages of online teaching as the feasibility of reviewing after class, the teaching time and place were more flexible and the students in different classes were able to join the course simultaneously; Teachers listed three difficulties of online teaching as barrier to implement the training of lab experiment, surgical operation and other clinical skills, the network is sometimes stuck, and students' learning situation were not able to be followed. There were 63.8% (67/105) of the students and 8 teachers thought that online teaching was a complementary pathway for traditional teaching at moment. Conclusions In the online teaching, the teachers are better prepared for the lesson, but the classroom interaction is not as good as that in traditional pathway. The current teaching mode should still be based on traditional pathway and online teaching function as a complementary technology to traditional teaching.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信