基于BP-ANN的油藏孔隙度预测

H. Hamidi, R. Rafati
{"title":"基于BP-ANN的油藏孔隙度预测","authors":"H. Hamidi, R. Rafati","doi":"10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Porosity of oil reservoir rock is usually determined by Core Analysis. But this method is expensive and time consuming. Also because of lithology changes, heterogeneity of reservoir rock, and nonexistence of sufficient well cores, determination of the parameters by the usual methods is not accurate. So the best way to decrease cost, increase accuracy, and decrease time is applying advanced software such as Geolog and Back-Propagation of Error Artificial Neural Network (BP-ANN). In this paper, a BP-ANN was designed to predict the porosity of formations using the well logs data in Parsi field, located in southwest of Iran. The data of two wells (No. 33 and No. 19) that have core data were used for training, testing, validation, and generalization processes. Then the BP-ANN results were compared to evaluations obtained from Geolog Software (GS). With respect to the results, it was concluded that the BP-ANN is more accurate than GS in determining oil reservoir porosity. At the end, porosity was simulated in three other wells (No. 48, 49, and 64) that lack core data.","PeriodicalId":117572,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Innovation Management and Technology Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of oil reservoir porosity based on BP-ANN\",\"authors\":\"H. Hamidi, R. Rafati\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Porosity of oil reservoir rock is usually determined by Core Analysis. But this method is expensive and time consuming. Also because of lithology changes, heterogeneity of reservoir rock, and nonexistence of sufficient well cores, determination of the parameters by the usual methods is not accurate. So the best way to decrease cost, increase accuracy, and decrease time is applying advanced software such as Geolog and Back-Propagation of Error Artificial Neural Network (BP-ANN). In this paper, a BP-ANN was designed to predict the porosity of formations using the well logs data in Parsi field, located in southwest of Iran. The data of two wells (No. 33 and No. 19) that have core data were used for training, testing, validation, and generalization processes. Then the BP-ANN results were compared to evaluations obtained from Geolog Software (GS). With respect to the results, it was concluded that the BP-ANN is more accurate than GS in determining oil reservoir porosity. At the end, porosity was simulated in three other wells (No. 48, 49, and 64) that lack core data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 International Conference on Innovation Management and Technology Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 International Conference on Innovation Management and Technology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Innovation Management and Technology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

储层岩石的孔隙度通常是通过岩心分析来确定的。但这种方法既昂贵又耗时。此外,由于岩性变化、储层岩石的非均质性以及没有足够的岩心,用常规方法确定参数是不准确的。因此,降低成本、提高精度和缩短时间的最佳途径是应用先进的软件,如地质和误差反向传播人工神经网络(BP-ANN)。本文利用伊朗西南部Parsi油田的测井数据,设计了BP-ANN来预测地层孔隙度。将具有岩心数据的两口井(33号井和19号井)的数据用于训练、测试、验证和推广过程。然后将BP-ANN结果与地质软件(GS)的评估结果进行比较。结果表明,BP-ANN在确定储层孔隙度方面比GS更准确。最后,对另外3口缺乏岩心数据的井(48、49和64)进行了孔隙度模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of oil reservoir porosity based on BP-ANN
Porosity of oil reservoir rock is usually determined by Core Analysis. But this method is expensive and time consuming. Also because of lithology changes, heterogeneity of reservoir rock, and nonexistence of sufficient well cores, determination of the parameters by the usual methods is not accurate. So the best way to decrease cost, increase accuracy, and decrease time is applying advanced software such as Geolog and Back-Propagation of Error Artificial Neural Network (BP-ANN). In this paper, a BP-ANN was designed to predict the porosity of formations using the well logs data in Parsi field, located in southwest of Iran. The data of two wells (No. 33 and No. 19) that have core data were used for training, testing, validation, and generalization processes. Then the BP-ANN results were compared to evaluations obtained from Geolog Software (GS). With respect to the results, it was concluded that the BP-ANN is more accurate than GS in determining oil reservoir porosity. At the end, porosity was simulated in three other wells (No. 48, 49, and 64) that lack core data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信