{"title":"MRI与关节镜诊断髌骨股痛患者软骨异常的比较研究","authors":"张峻, 王友, 侯筱魁, 史定伟","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-634X.2007.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"目的 探讨核磁共振成像(MRI,SPIR/3D T1-FFE序列)在诊断膝前疼痛患者软骨病变中的价值.方法 74例髌股关节疼痛患者(78膝)进行MRI检查和关节镜手术.选择SPIR/3D T1-FFE序列对软骨进行成像,按照Recht分级标准对软骨的病变进行诊断.关节镜下按照Outerbridge分级标准进行诊断,分析MRI分级和关节镜分级的相关性和SPIR/3D T1-FFE诊断软骨病变的敏感性及特异性.结果 通过MRI(SPIR/3D T1-FFE序列)可以较好显示髌骨软骨的4层结构.MRI和关节镜对软骨病变分级之间存在正相关(U=3.97,P<0.01).同关节镜相比,MRI对Ⅰ级软骨诊断的敏感度为58.30%,特异度为97.83%;对Ⅱ级软骨诊断的敏感度为67.61%,特异度为95.94%;对Ⅲ级软骨诊断的敏感度为93.58%,特异度为97.48%;对Ⅳ级软骨诊断的敏感度为91.80%,特异度为98.02%.MRI诊断软骨损伤总体敏感度为93.87%,特异度为95.63%.结论 MRI(SPIR/3D T1-FFE序列)是诊断软骨病变的理想序列,MRI和关节镜检查对关节软骨的评价各有特色,两者存在着较高的相关性和互补性,MRI在诊断早期软骨内部病变方面比关节镜有优势.将两者结合起来,可以更好地对髌股关节软骨病变作出诊断。","PeriodicalId":189947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Clinical Medical Bioengineering","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of MRI and arthroscopy in diagnosis of chondral abnormalities in patellofemoral pain patients\",\"authors\":\"张峻, 王友, 侯筱魁, 史定伟\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-634X.2007.01.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"目的 探讨核磁共振成像(MRI,SPIR/3D T1-FFE序列)在诊断膝前疼痛患者软骨病变中的价值.方法 74例髌股关节疼痛患者(78膝)进行MRI检查和关节镜手术.选择SPIR/3D T1-FFE序列对软骨进行成像,按照Recht分级标准对软骨的病变进行诊断.关节镜下按照Outerbridge分级标准进行诊断,分析MRI分级和关节镜分级的相关性和SPIR/3D T1-FFE诊断软骨病变的敏感性及特异性.结果 通过MRI(SPIR/3D T1-FFE序列)可以较好显示髌骨软骨的4层结构.MRI和关节镜对软骨病变分级之间存在正相关(U=3.97,P<0.01).同关节镜相比,MRI对Ⅰ级软骨诊断的敏感度为58.30%,特异度为97.83%;对Ⅱ级软骨诊断的敏感度为67.61%,特异度为95.94%;对Ⅲ级软骨诊断的敏感度为93.58%,特异度为97.48%;对Ⅳ级软骨诊断的敏感度为91.80%,特异度为98.02%.MRI诊断软骨损伤总体敏感度为93.87%,特异度为95.63%.结论 MRI(SPIR/3D T1-FFE序列)是诊断软骨病变的理想序列,MRI和关节镜检查对关节软骨的评价各有特色,两者存在着较高的相关性和互补性,MRI在诊断早期软骨内部病变方面比关节镜有优势.将两者结合起来,可以更好地对髌股关节软骨病变作出诊断。\",\"PeriodicalId\":189947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Clinical Medical Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Clinical Medical Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-634X.2007.01.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Clinical Medical Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-634X.2007.01.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}