运动后立即左室射血分数(LVEF)的诊断价值。

F H Jansen, M J van Kroonenburgh, E E van der Wall, R Valkema, A H Zwinderman, J A Blokland, E K Pauwels
{"title":"运动后立即左室射血分数(LVEF)的诊断价值。","authors":"F H Jansen,&nbsp;M J van Kroonenburgh,&nbsp;E E van der Wall,&nbsp;R Valkema,&nbsp;A H Zwinderman,&nbsp;J A Blokland,&nbsp;E K Pauwels","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic value of immediate post-exercise left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed in 161 patients at rest, during maximal exercise, and immediately post-exercise by radionuclide angiography. Fifteen patients had a second examination, giving a total of 176 radionuclide examinations. Additionally, the correlation between post-exercise LVEF and physical validity was investigated. Sixty-one patients (35%) with a recent myocardial infarction (less than 4 weeks), 66 patients (37%) with an old myocardial infarction (greater than 4 weeks), and 21 patients (12%) with valvular lesions were studied. Twenty-eight patients (16%) with an abdominal aneurysm were considered as controls based on history and a normal resting and exercise electrocardiogram (ECG). LVEF and a cumulative regional wall motion (RWM) score for three regions were obtained. LVEF post-exercise was significantly increased compared to LVEF at maximal exercise in all four diagnostic groups. Absolute LVEF values were significantly dependent on the level of exercise. We conclude that immediate post-exercise LVEF should not be used for separating patients with and without coronary artery disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":76992,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiologic imaging","volume":"6 3","pages":"105-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic value of immediate post-exercise left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).\",\"authors\":\"F H Jansen,&nbsp;M J van Kroonenburgh,&nbsp;E E van der Wall,&nbsp;R Valkema,&nbsp;A H Zwinderman,&nbsp;J A Blokland,&nbsp;E K Pauwels\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The diagnostic value of immediate post-exercise left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed in 161 patients at rest, during maximal exercise, and immediately post-exercise by radionuclide angiography. Fifteen patients had a second examination, giving a total of 176 radionuclide examinations. Additionally, the correlation between post-exercise LVEF and physical validity was investigated. Sixty-one patients (35%) with a recent myocardial infarction (less than 4 weeks), 66 patients (37%) with an old myocardial infarction (greater than 4 weeks), and 21 patients (12%) with valvular lesions were studied. Twenty-eight patients (16%) with an abdominal aneurysm were considered as controls based on history and a normal resting and exercise electrocardiogram (ECG). LVEF and a cumulative regional wall motion (RWM) score for three regions were obtained. LVEF post-exercise was significantly increased compared to LVEF at maximal exercise in all four diagnostic groups. Absolute LVEF values were significantly dependent on the level of exercise. We conclude that immediate post-exercise LVEF should not be used for separating patients with and without coronary artery disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of physiologic imaging\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"105-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of physiologic imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiologic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过放射性核素血管造影对161例静息、剧烈运动和运动后立即左室射血分数(LVEF)的诊断价值进行了评估。15例患者复查,共176次放射性核素检查。此外,研究了运动后LVEF与身体效度的相关性。本文研究了61例(35%)新近心肌梗死(小于4周)、66例(37%)旧发心肌梗死(大于4周)和21例(12%)瓣膜病变患者。根据病史和正常的静息和运动心电图(ECG),将28例(16%)腹腔动脉瘤患者作为对照组。获得了三个区域的LVEF和累积区域壁面运动(RWM)评分。在所有四个诊断组中,运动后的LVEF与最大运动时的LVEF相比显著增加。绝对LVEF值显著依赖于运动水平。我们的结论是,运动后立即LVEF不应用于分离冠心病患者和非冠心病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The diagnostic value of immediate post-exercise left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

The diagnostic value of immediate post-exercise left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed in 161 patients at rest, during maximal exercise, and immediately post-exercise by radionuclide angiography. Fifteen patients had a second examination, giving a total of 176 radionuclide examinations. Additionally, the correlation between post-exercise LVEF and physical validity was investigated. Sixty-one patients (35%) with a recent myocardial infarction (less than 4 weeks), 66 patients (37%) with an old myocardial infarction (greater than 4 weeks), and 21 patients (12%) with valvular lesions were studied. Twenty-eight patients (16%) with an abdominal aneurysm were considered as controls based on history and a normal resting and exercise electrocardiogram (ECG). LVEF and a cumulative regional wall motion (RWM) score for three regions were obtained. LVEF post-exercise was significantly increased compared to LVEF at maximal exercise in all four diagnostic groups. Absolute LVEF values were significantly dependent on the level of exercise. We conclude that immediate post-exercise LVEF should not be used for separating patients with and without coronary artery disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信