{"title":"特征建模与决策建模:历史、比较和前景","authors":"Rick Rabiser","doi":"10.1145/3307630.3342399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modeling variability, i.e., defining the commonalities and variability of reusable artifacts, is a central task of software product line engineering. Numerous variability modeling approaches have been proposed in the last three decades. Most of these approaches are based on feature modeling (FM) or decision modeling (DM), two classes of variability approaches that go back to initial proposals made in the early 1990ies, i.e., FODA for FM and Synthesis for DM. This extended abstract summarizes the history of FM and DM as well as the results of a systematic comparison between FM and DM published earlier. We also outline perspectives, especially regarding potential synergies and key common elements that should be part of a standard variability modeling language.","PeriodicalId":424711,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feature Modeling vs. Decision Modeling: History, Comparison and Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Rick Rabiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3307630.3342399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modeling variability, i.e., defining the commonalities and variability of reusable artifacts, is a central task of software product line engineering. Numerous variability modeling approaches have been proposed in the last three decades. Most of these approaches are based on feature modeling (FM) or decision modeling (DM), two classes of variability approaches that go back to initial proposals made in the early 1990ies, i.e., FODA for FM and Synthesis for DM. This extended abstract summarizes the history of FM and DM as well as the results of a systematic comparison between FM and DM published earlier. We also outline perspectives, especially regarding potential synergies and key common elements that should be part of a standard variability modeling language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3307630.3342399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3307630.3342399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feature Modeling vs. Decision Modeling: History, Comparison and Perspectives
Modeling variability, i.e., defining the commonalities and variability of reusable artifacts, is a central task of software product line engineering. Numerous variability modeling approaches have been proposed in the last three decades. Most of these approaches are based on feature modeling (FM) or decision modeling (DM), two classes of variability approaches that go back to initial proposals made in the early 1990ies, i.e., FODA for FM and Synthesis for DM. This extended abstract summarizes the history of FM and DM as well as the results of a systematic comparison between FM and DM published earlier. We also outline perspectives, especially regarding potential synergies and key common elements that should be part of a standard variability modeling language.