特征建模与决策建模:历史、比较和前景

Rick Rabiser
{"title":"特征建模与决策建模:历史、比较和前景","authors":"Rick Rabiser","doi":"10.1145/3307630.3342399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modeling variability, i.e., defining the commonalities and variability of reusable artifacts, is a central task of software product line engineering. Numerous variability modeling approaches have been proposed in the last three decades. Most of these approaches are based on feature modeling (FM) or decision modeling (DM), two classes of variability approaches that go back to initial proposals made in the early 1990ies, i.e., FODA for FM and Synthesis for DM. This extended abstract summarizes the history of FM and DM as well as the results of a systematic comparison between FM and DM published earlier. We also outline perspectives, especially regarding potential synergies and key common elements that should be part of a standard variability modeling language.","PeriodicalId":424711,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feature Modeling vs. Decision Modeling: History, Comparison and Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Rick Rabiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3307630.3342399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modeling variability, i.e., defining the commonalities and variability of reusable artifacts, is a central task of software product line engineering. Numerous variability modeling approaches have been proposed in the last three decades. Most of these approaches are based on feature modeling (FM) or decision modeling (DM), two classes of variability approaches that go back to initial proposals made in the early 1990ies, i.e., FODA for FM and Synthesis for DM. This extended abstract summarizes the history of FM and DM as well as the results of a systematic comparison between FM and DM published earlier. We also outline perspectives, especially regarding potential synergies and key common elements that should be part of a standard variability modeling language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3307630.3342399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3307630.3342399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

建模可变性,即定义可重用工件的共性和可变性,是软件产品线工程的中心任务。在过去的三十年中,已经提出了许多变率建模方法。这些方法中的大多数都是基于特征建模(FM)或决策建模(DM),这两类可变性方法可以追溯到20世纪90年代初提出的最初建议,即FM的FODA和DM的综合。这篇扩展摘要总结了FM和DM的历史,以及FM和DM之前发表的系统比较结果。我们还概述了透视图,特别是关于潜在的协同作用和应该成为标准可变性建模语言一部分的关键公共元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feature Modeling vs. Decision Modeling: History, Comparison and Perspectives
Modeling variability, i.e., defining the commonalities and variability of reusable artifacts, is a central task of software product line engineering. Numerous variability modeling approaches have been proposed in the last three decades. Most of these approaches are based on feature modeling (FM) or decision modeling (DM), two classes of variability approaches that go back to initial proposals made in the early 1990ies, i.e., FODA for FM and Synthesis for DM. This extended abstract summarizes the history of FM and DM as well as the results of a systematic comparison between FM and DM published earlier. We also outline perspectives, especially regarding potential synergies and key common elements that should be part of a standard variability modeling language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信