美国、日本和欧洲——哪些地区在客户满意度方面有优势,为什么?【半导体资本设备】

C.D. Burgeson
{"title":"美国、日本和欧洲——哪些地区在客户满意度方面有优势,为什么?【半导体资本设备】","authors":"C.D. Burgeson","doi":"10.1109/ASMC.1998.731557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results are in for the 1998 VLSI Research Inc. customer satisfaction survey on semiconductor capital equipment, and the overall ratings have increased by 0.10 points, to 7.28. This outcome is the effect of improved customer support and equipment performance by Japanese and American suppliers. One of the reasons for the year's enhanced effort is the lack of growth in the equipment market. Although focusing on customer satisfaction is important under any circumstances, companies often increase their attention to customers as sales decrease. As a consequence of this extra attention, the competition for customer satisfaction is increasing. For example, every year the top companies improve the previous year's score, and the top ratings in all five product categories have increased in the last two years. Another example of competition is the convergence of scores among areas of the world. In the 1996 survey, the difference in ratings between first place (European suppliers) and last (Japanese suppliers) was 0.87 points, but this difference decreased to 0.78 points in 1997. In the 1998 survey, European manufacturers still have the highest ratings and Japanese have the lowest, but the difference is now only 0.40 points. The main reason for this immense change in the past year is a surprising decline in ratings for European suppliers. This article analyses survey results for each of the three supplier groups, and looks at the reasons behind the convergence in customer satisfaction ratings.","PeriodicalId":290016,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/SEMI 1998 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop (Cat. No.98CH36168)","volume":"1651 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"America, Japan, and Europe-which areas have the edge in customer satisfaction and why [semiconductor capital equipment]\",\"authors\":\"C.D. Burgeson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASMC.1998.731557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results are in for the 1998 VLSI Research Inc. customer satisfaction survey on semiconductor capital equipment, and the overall ratings have increased by 0.10 points, to 7.28. This outcome is the effect of improved customer support and equipment performance by Japanese and American suppliers. One of the reasons for the year's enhanced effort is the lack of growth in the equipment market. Although focusing on customer satisfaction is important under any circumstances, companies often increase their attention to customers as sales decrease. As a consequence of this extra attention, the competition for customer satisfaction is increasing. For example, every year the top companies improve the previous year's score, and the top ratings in all five product categories have increased in the last two years. Another example of competition is the convergence of scores among areas of the world. In the 1996 survey, the difference in ratings between first place (European suppliers) and last (Japanese suppliers) was 0.87 points, but this difference decreased to 0.78 points in 1997. In the 1998 survey, European manufacturers still have the highest ratings and Japanese have the lowest, but the difference is now only 0.40 points. The main reason for this immense change in the past year is a surprising decline in ratings for European suppliers. This article analyses survey results for each of the three supplier groups, and looks at the reasons behind the convergence in customer satisfaction ratings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":290016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE/SEMI 1998 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop (Cat. No.98CH36168)\",\"volume\":\"1651 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE/SEMI 1998 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop (Cat. No.98CH36168)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1998.731557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/SEMI 1998 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop (Cat. No.98CH36168)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1998.731557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这是1998年VLSI研究公司对半导体资本设备进行的顾客满意度调查的结果,总体评分为7.28分,比去年上升了0.10分。这一结果是日本和美国供应商改善客户支持和设备性能的结果。今年加大力度的原因之一是设备市场缺乏增长。尽管关注客户满意度在任何情况下都很重要,但随着销售额的下降,公司往往会增加对客户的关注。由于这种额外的关注,对客户满意度的竞争正在加剧。例如,排名靠前的公司每年都在提高前一年的得分,在过去两年中,所有五个产品类别的最高评级都有所提高。竞争的另一个例子是世界各地区之间的分数趋同。在1996年的调查中,第一名(欧洲企业)和最后一名(日本企业)的分数差距为0.87分,但到了1997年,差距缩小到了0.78分。在1998年的调查中,欧洲制造商的得分仍然最高,日本制造商的得分最低,但现在的差距只有0.40分。去年发生这种巨大变化的主要原因是欧洲供应商的评级出人意料地下降。本文分析了这三个供应商组的调查结果,并探讨了客户满意度评级趋同背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
America, Japan, and Europe-which areas have the edge in customer satisfaction and why [semiconductor capital equipment]
The results are in for the 1998 VLSI Research Inc. customer satisfaction survey on semiconductor capital equipment, and the overall ratings have increased by 0.10 points, to 7.28. This outcome is the effect of improved customer support and equipment performance by Japanese and American suppliers. One of the reasons for the year's enhanced effort is the lack of growth in the equipment market. Although focusing on customer satisfaction is important under any circumstances, companies often increase their attention to customers as sales decrease. As a consequence of this extra attention, the competition for customer satisfaction is increasing. For example, every year the top companies improve the previous year's score, and the top ratings in all five product categories have increased in the last two years. Another example of competition is the convergence of scores among areas of the world. In the 1996 survey, the difference in ratings between first place (European suppliers) and last (Japanese suppliers) was 0.87 points, but this difference decreased to 0.78 points in 1997. In the 1998 survey, European manufacturers still have the highest ratings and Japanese have the lowest, but the difference is now only 0.40 points. The main reason for this immense change in the past year is a surprising decline in ratings for European suppliers. This article analyses survey results for each of the three supplier groups, and looks at the reasons behind the convergence in customer satisfaction ratings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信