运行过程控制中的实际问题

D. Boning, W. Moyne, T. Smith, J. Moyne, A. Hurwitz
{"title":"运行过程控制中的实际问题","authors":"D. Boning, W. Moyne, T. Smith, J. Moyne, A. Hurwitz","doi":"10.1109/ASMC.1995.484371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several works have described the implementation of systems for the run by run (RbR) control of semiconductor fabrication processes. In this paper, we consider algorithmic issues not often discussed arising out of our experience in the RbR control of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). These issues include, first, limits on multiple input variables (machine settings). Such constraints must be implemented efficiently, and we compare a fast heuristic-based constraint method against a full optimization approach. Second, an input weight method enables the process engineer to manage which input parameters should be more readily modified and which should be changed less. Third, we have found that rounding off of suggested recipes before use on equipment (because of limited granularity in machine settings) can degrade the operational results compared to those ideally expected. We describe a heuristic that handles the quantization of input variables so as to improve the model based recipes suggested by the controller. This heuristic avoids the computational implication of a full integer optimization problem. Finally, we discuss methods for the selection of key controller parameters (e.g. the \"forgetting factor\" in an exponentially weighted moving average controller). Together, these and similar practical barriers must be understood and solved in order to have a usable run by run control strategy. These extensions to the MIT RbR algorithms have been implemented and successfully demonstrated in the control of CMP processes.","PeriodicalId":237741,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical issues in run by run process control\",\"authors\":\"D. Boning, W. Moyne, T. Smith, J. Moyne, A. Hurwitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASMC.1995.484371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several works have described the implementation of systems for the run by run (RbR) control of semiconductor fabrication processes. In this paper, we consider algorithmic issues not often discussed arising out of our experience in the RbR control of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). These issues include, first, limits on multiple input variables (machine settings). Such constraints must be implemented efficiently, and we compare a fast heuristic-based constraint method against a full optimization approach. Second, an input weight method enables the process engineer to manage which input parameters should be more readily modified and which should be changed less. Third, we have found that rounding off of suggested recipes before use on equipment (because of limited granularity in machine settings) can degrade the operational results compared to those ideally expected. We describe a heuristic that handles the quantization of input variables so as to improve the model based recipes suggested by the controller. This heuristic avoids the computational implication of a full integer optimization problem. Finally, we discuss methods for the selection of key controller parameters (e.g. the \\\"forgetting factor\\\" in an exponentially weighted moving average controller). Together, these and similar practical barriers must be understood and solved in order to have a usable run by run control strategy. These extensions to the MIT RbR algorithms have been implemented and successfully demonstrated in the control of CMP processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1995.484371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.1995.484371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

一些著作描述了半导体制造过程的逐行(RbR)控制系统的实现。在本文中,我们考虑了我们在化学机械抛光(CMP)的RbR控制中的经验中不经常讨论的算法问题。这些问题包括,首先,对多个输入变量(机器设置)的限制。这些约束必须有效地实现,我们比较了快速启发式约束方法和完全优化方法。其次,输入权重法使过程工程师能够管理哪些输入参数应该更容易修改,哪些应该较少更改。第三,我们发现在设备上使用之前将建议的配方四舍五入(因为机器设置中的粒度有限)可以降低与理想预期相比的操作结果。我们描述了一种启发式方法来处理输入变量的量化,从而改进由控制器提出的基于模型的食谱。这种启发式方法避免了全整数优化问题的计算含义。最后,我们讨论了选择关键控制器参数的方法(例如指数加权移动平均控制器中的“遗忘因子”)。总之,这些和类似的实际障碍必须理解和解决,以便有一个可用的逐次运行控制策略。这些对MIT RbR算法的扩展已经在CMP过程的控制中实现并成功演示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical issues in run by run process control
Several works have described the implementation of systems for the run by run (RbR) control of semiconductor fabrication processes. In this paper, we consider algorithmic issues not often discussed arising out of our experience in the RbR control of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). These issues include, first, limits on multiple input variables (machine settings). Such constraints must be implemented efficiently, and we compare a fast heuristic-based constraint method against a full optimization approach. Second, an input weight method enables the process engineer to manage which input parameters should be more readily modified and which should be changed less. Third, we have found that rounding off of suggested recipes before use on equipment (because of limited granularity in machine settings) can degrade the operational results compared to those ideally expected. We describe a heuristic that handles the quantization of input variables so as to improve the model based recipes suggested by the controller. This heuristic avoids the computational implication of a full integer optimization problem. Finally, we discuss methods for the selection of key controller parameters (e.g. the "forgetting factor" in an exponentially weighted moving average controller). Together, these and similar practical barriers must be understood and solved in order to have a usable run by run control strategy. These extensions to the MIT RbR algorithms have been implemented and successfully demonstrated in the control of CMP processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信