家庭与可持续绿色技术:综述

Simona Bigerna, C. Bollino, Silvia Micheli, Paolo Polinori
{"title":"家庭与可持续绿色技术:综述","authors":"Simona Bigerna, C. Bollino, Silvia Micheli, Paolo Polinori","doi":"10.5220/0005907403780383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is widespread consensus in the climate research community that households show different attitudes toward the broad spectrum of technologies and policy instruments implemented to reduce CO2 emissions. The aim of this paper is to investigate the monetary aspect of socio-economic acceptability of four sustainable green technologies development: green electricity, energy savings in residential buildings, smart meters and alternative fuel vehicles. We obtained information on willingness to pay, and/or willingness to accept, for such technologies from a sample of 35 papers taken from the literature. We homogenize this information computing an implicit price of a Kg of CO2 avoided, named PCO2. A qualitative analysis is carried out to explain the households' attitude to avoid CO2 in monetary terms. Results show that on average PCO2 is positive. There are, however, some negative attitudes only in the case of alternative fuel vehicles. In conclusion, empirical results show that households have a favorable attitude toward sustainable green technologies, but further research is desirable to design new policies to make the future of the sustainable society more plausible.","PeriodicalId":448232,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Households and sustainable green technologies: A review\",\"authors\":\"Simona Bigerna, C. Bollino, Silvia Micheli, Paolo Polinori\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0005907403780383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is widespread consensus in the climate research community that households show different attitudes toward the broad spectrum of technologies and policy instruments implemented to reduce CO2 emissions. The aim of this paper is to investigate the monetary aspect of socio-economic acceptability of four sustainable green technologies development: green electricity, energy savings in residential buildings, smart meters and alternative fuel vehicles. We obtained information on willingness to pay, and/or willingness to accept, for such technologies from a sample of 35 papers taken from the literature. We homogenize this information computing an implicit price of a Kg of CO2 avoided, named PCO2. A qualitative analysis is carried out to explain the households' attitude to avoid CO2 in monetary terms. Results show that on average PCO2 is positive. There are, however, some negative attitudes only in the case of alternative fuel vehicles. In conclusion, empirical results show that households have a favorable attitude toward sustainable green technologies, but further research is desirable to design new policies to make the future of the sustainable society more plausible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005907403780383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005907403780383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候研究界有一个广泛的共识,即家庭对减少二氧化碳排放的广泛技术和政策工具表现出不同的态度。本文的目的是调查四种可持续绿色技术发展的社会经济可接受性的货币方面:绿色电力,住宅建筑节能,智能电表和替代燃料汽车。我们从文献中的35篇论文中获得了这些技术的支付意愿和/或接受意愿的信息。我们将这些信息均质化,计算出每千克二氧化碳避免的隐含价格,称为二氧化碳分压。进行了定性分析,以解释家庭在货币方面避免二氧化碳的态度。结果表明,平均二氧化碳分压为正。然而,也有一些人对替代燃料汽车持否定态度。综上所述,实证结果表明,家庭对可持续绿色技术持积极态度,但需要进一步的研究来设计新的政策,使可持续社会的未来更加可信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Households and sustainable green technologies: A review
There is widespread consensus in the climate research community that households show different attitudes toward the broad spectrum of technologies and policy instruments implemented to reduce CO2 emissions. The aim of this paper is to investigate the monetary aspect of socio-economic acceptability of four sustainable green technologies development: green electricity, energy savings in residential buildings, smart meters and alternative fuel vehicles. We obtained information on willingness to pay, and/or willingness to accept, for such technologies from a sample of 35 papers taken from the literature. We homogenize this information computing an implicit price of a Kg of CO2 avoided, named PCO2. A qualitative analysis is carried out to explain the households' attitude to avoid CO2 in monetary terms. Results show that on average PCO2 is positive. There are, however, some negative attitudes only in the case of alternative fuel vehicles. In conclusion, empirical results show that households have a favorable attitude toward sustainable green technologies, but further research is desirable to design new policies to make the future of the sustainable society more plausible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信