{"title":"如何认识我们的极限","authors":"N. Ballantyne","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapters 5 through 9 of this book defend a method to think about our opinions concerning controversial questions. The method offers us insights into the epistemic status of our controversial opinions. This chapter introduces key concepts and terminology: belief and controversial belief; unreasonableness and defeaters; positive epistemic status; competence defeaters; and the “doxastically open” mindset people may adopt if they are guided by the method’s principles.","PeriodicalId":345622,"journal":{"name":"Knowing Our Limits","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Know Our Limits\",\"authors\":\"N. Ballantyne\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapters 5 through 9 of this book defend a method to think about our opinions concerning controversial questions. The method offers us insights into the epistemic status of our controversial opinions. This chapter introduces key concepts and terminology: belief and controversial belief; unreasonableness and defeaters; positive epistemic status; competence defeaters; and the “doxastically open” mindset people may adopt if they are guided by the method’s principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowing Our Limits\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowing Our Limits\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowing Our Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190847289.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chapters 5 through 9 of this book defend a method to think about our opinions concerning controversial questions. The method offers us insights into the epistemic status of our controversial opinions. This chapter introduces key concepts and terminology: belief and controversial belief; unreasonableness and defeaters; positive epistemic status; competence defeaters; and the “doxastically open” mindset people may adopt if they are guided by the method’s principles.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
