R. Plumb, Jacob N. Shapiro, Benjamin Crisman, Manu Singh, James Mao
{"title":"阿富汗的稳定:暴力、态度、福利和项目活动的趋势","authors":"R. Plumb, Jacob N. Shapiro, Benjamin Crisman, Manu Singh, James Mao","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2987607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes data from multiple sources to better understand the relationship between stabilization programming and trends in key outcomes — including: security, popular support for the government, popular support for antigovernment elements, community cohesion and resilience, health of the Afghan people, economic well-being of the Afghan people, and conflict.","PeriodicalId":447069,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Structure","volume":"47 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stabilization in Afghanistan: Trends in Violence, Attitudes, Well-Being and Program Activity\",\"authors\":\"R. Plumb, Jacob N. Shapiro, Benjamin Crisman, Manu Singh, James Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2987607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes data from multiple sources to better understand the relationship between stabilization programming and trends in key outcomes — including: security, popular support for the government, popular support for antigovernment elements, community cohesion and resilience, health of the Afghan people, economic well-being of the Afghan people, and conflict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Structure\",\"volume\":\"47 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Structure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2987607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Structure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2987607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stabilization in Afghanistan: Trends in Violence, Attitudes, Well-Being and Program Activity
This paper analyzes data from multiple sources to better understand the relationship between stabilization programming and trends in key outcomes — including: security, popular support for the government, popular support for antigovernment elements, community cohesion and resilience, health of the Afghan people, economic well-being of the Afghan people, and conflict.