优化Covid-19与糖尿病患者皮质类固醇治疗的比较分析方法

Ikram Ghouri Mukarram Mohammed, I. Kurnikova, Maiorov Vladimir, Iuliia Verzina, T. Meleshkevich, Evgeniya Tavlueva
{"title":"优化Covid-19与糖尿病患者皮质类固醇治疗的比较分析方法","authors":"Ikram Ghouri Mukarram Mohammed, I. Kurnikova, Maiorov Vladimir, Iuliia Verzina, T. Meleshkevich, Evgeniya Tavlueva","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The method of comparative analysis is one of the most common in\n science where optimal choices are required. Despite the fact the method is empirical,\n under the conditions of epidemics such as Covid-19, it is one of the most affordable in\n assessing the effectiveness of the therapy. Patients with diabetes having coronavirus\n infection are included in the risk group which required steroid therapy. In patients\n with diabetes, excessive usage of Exogenous corticosteroids creates insulin deficiency\n which leads to hyperglycemia and the risk of developing coma. Purpose of the study:\n сompare the effectiveness and safety of using corticosteroids in patients with Covid-19\n and diabetes prescribed \"by standards\" and \"method of\n calculation\". Method: Diabetic Patients with novel coronavirus infection were\n screened (n = 107).All patients were divided into 3 groups.In group 1(n=35) patients\n received dexamethasone at a dosage of 0.1 mg/kg once a day in the morning intravenously;\n in group 2(n = 38), patients received dexamethasone 20 mg twice daily intravenously in\n the morning and evening (more than 0.2 mg/kg/day) and in group 3(n = 34) patients\n received dexamethasone 0.1 mg /kg once a day in the morning intramuscularly. Comparative\n analysis were carried out according to the criteria: the period of intoxication,\n glycemic variability, CRP, leukocyte counts, D-dimer, and transaminases. For analysis\n STATISTIC 10,0 computer program was used (Matematica®, Matlab®, HarvardGraphics®)\n StatSoft). Results: In all the groups after therapy it was noted redistributive\n leukocytosis.In patients receiving high therapeutic dose (group 2) initially suppressed\n production of leukocytes is activated and reaches the normative indicator\n (p<0.001) and the indicators are comparable to the data of group\n 3(p<0.001)in which patients received glucocorticoids at a lower dose (0.1\n mg/kg/day) intramuscularly. The most significant decrease in D-dimer levels was in\n patients with a dosage of dexamethasone at the rate of 0.1 units/kg once a day\n intravenously by 80.9%(P <0.0001);intramuscularly by\n 73.2%(P<0.00001)and with intravenously at a dose of more than 0.2 units/kg\n there was a decrease in the level of D-dimer by 67.9% (P <0.00001). Decrease\n in CRP (cytokine storm relief rate) did not differ significantly between the groups,\n which eliminates the role of inexpedient usage of dexamethasone in dosages of more than\n 0.2 units/kg/day.Fasting blood glucose in patients in group 3 increased by 22%\n (P<0.0002); in group 1 only by 12% (P <0.05)and in group 2 by 32%\n (P <0.0001). In all the groups, an increase was observed in postprandial\n glucose, and in group 2 to the level of developing ketoacidosis and required emergency\n intervention by increasing the dose of insulin. Conclusion: For patients without\n diabetes, the dose of dexamethasone is prescribed in accordance with standards (average\n dose) regardless of body weight and concomitant diseases. In patients with diabetes are\n required to determine the dose of dexamethasone individually at the rate of 0.1 mg /kg\n body weight per day. This method reduces the risk of adverse outcomes and ensures the\n achievement of positive dynamics of clinical and laboratory parameters which ultimately\n reduces mortality and shortens the recovery time.","PeriodicalId":383834,"journal":{"name":"Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET-AI 2023): Artificial\n Intelligence and Future Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis Methods in Optimizing Corticosteroid Therapy in Patients with\\n Covid-19 and Diabetes Mellitus\",\"authors\":\"Ikram Ghouri Mukarram Mohammed, I. Kurnikova, Maiorov Vladimir, Iuliia Verzina, T. Meleshkevich, Evgeniya Tavlueva\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1002958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The method of comparative analysis is one of the most common in\\n science where optimal choices are required. Despite the fact the method is empirical,\\n under the conditions of epidemics such as Covid-19, it is one of the most affordable in\\n assessing the effectiveness of the therapy. Patients with diabetes having coronavirus\\n infection are included in the risk group which required steroid therapy. In patients\\n with diabetes, excessive usage of Exogenous corticosteroids creates insulin deficiency\\n which leads to hyperglycemia and the risk of developing coma. Purpose of the study:\\n сompare the effectiveness and safety of using corticosteroids in patients with Covid-19\\n and diabetes prescribed \\\"by standards\\\" and \\\"method of\\n calculation\\\". Method: Diabetic Patients with novel coronavirus infection were\\n screened (n = 107).All patients were divided into 3 groups.In group 1(n=35) patients\\n received dexamethasone at a dosage of 0.1 mg/kg once a day in the morning intravenously;\\n in group 2(n = 38), patients received dexamethasone 20 mg twice daily intravenously in\\n the morning and evening (more than 0.2 mg/kg/day) and in group 3(n = 34) patients\\n received dexamethasone 0.1 mg /kg once a day in the morning intramuscularly. Comparative\\n analysis were carried out according to the criteria: the period of intoxication,\\n glycemic variability, CRP, leukocyte counts, D-dimer, and transaminases. For analysis\\n STATISTIC 10,0 computer program was used (Matematica®, Matlab®, HarvardGraphics®)\\n StatSoft). Results: In all the groups after therapy it was noted redistributive\\n leukocytosis.In patients receiving high therapeutic dose (group 2) initially suppressed\\n production of leukocytes is activated and reaches the normative indicator\\n (p<0.001) and the indicators are comparable to the data of group\\n 3(p<0.001)in which patients received glucocorticoids at a lower dose (0.1\\n mg/kg/day) intramuscularly. The most significant decrease in D-dimer levels was in\\n patients with a dosage of dexamethasone at the rate of 0.1 units/kg once a day\\n intravenously by 80.9%(P <0.0001);intramuscularly by\\n 73.2%(P<0.00001)and with intravenously at a dose of more than 0.2 units/kg\\n there was a decrease in the level of D-dimer by 67.9% (P <0.00001). Decrease\\n in CRP (cytokine storm relief rate) did not differ significantly between the groups,\\n which eliminates the role of inexpedient usage of dexamethasone in dosages of more than\\n 0.2 units/kg/day.Fasting blood glucose in patients in group 3 increased by 22%\\n (P<0.0002); in group 1 only by 12% (P <0.05)and in group 2 by 32%\\n (P <0.0001). In all the groups, an increase was observed in postprandial\\n glucose, and in group 2 to the level of developing ketoacidosis and required emergency\\n intervention by increasing the dose of insulin. Conclusion: For patients without\\n diabetes, the dose of dexamethasone is prescribed in accordance with standards (average\\n dose) regardless of body weight and concomitant diseases. In patients with diabetes are\\n required to determine the dose of dexamethasone individually at the rate of 0.1 mg /kg\\n body weight per day. This method reduces the risk of adverse outcomes and ensures the\\n achievement of positive dynamics of clinical and laboratory parameters which ultimately\\n reduces mortality and shortens the recovery time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET-AI 2023): Artificial\\n Intelligence and Future Applications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET-AI 2023): Artificial\\n Intelligence and Future Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET-AI 2023): Artificial\n Intelligence and Future Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:比较分析法是科学研究中最常用的一种方法,在科学研究中需要做出最优选择。尽管该方法是经验性的,但在Covid-19等流行病的情况下,它是评估治疗效果最实惠的方法之一。感染冠状病毒的糖尿病患者属于需要类固醇治疗的危险群体。在糖尿病患者中,过量使用外源性皮质类固醇会导致胰岛素缺乏,从而导致高血糖和发生昏迷的风险。研究目的:比较“按标准”处方和“计算方法”处方在Covid-19和糖尿病患者中使用皮质类固醇的有效性和安全性。方法:筛选合并新型冠状病毒感染的糖尿病患者107例。所有患者分为3组。第1组(n=35)患者给予地塞米松,剂量为0.1 mg/kg,每天早晨静脉注射1次;2组(n = 38)患者每天早晚静脉给予地塞米松20 mg(大于0.2 mg/kg/天),3组(n = 34)患者每天早晨肌肉注射地塞米松0.1 mg/kg,每天1次。根据中毒时间、血糖变异性、CRP、白细胞计数、d -二聚体、转氨酶进行比较分析。统计分析采用统计软件(Matematica®,Matlab®,HarvardGraphics®)StatSoft)。结果:治疗后各组均出现白细胞再分配性增多。在接受高治疗剂量(2组)的患者中,最初抑制的白细胞产生被激活并达到规范指标(p<0.001),这些指标与接受较低剂量(0.1 mg/kg/天)肌内糖皮质激素的3组(p<0.001)的数据相当。d -二聚体水平下降最显著的是,地塞米松剂量为0.1单位/kg,每天1次,静脉注射,降幅为80.9%(P <0.0001);肌肉注射,降幅为73.2%(P<0.00001);静脉注射剂量大于0.2单位/kg, d -二聚体水平下降67.9% (P<0.00001)。CRP(细胞因子风暴缓解率)的降低在两组之间没有显着差异,这消除了使用剂量超过0.2单位/kg/天的地塞米松不适当的作用。3组患者空腹血糖升高22% (P<0.0002);第1组仅减少12% (P <0.05),第2组减少32% (P <0.0001)。在所有组中,均观察到餐后血糖升高,在第2组中,出现酮症酸中毒,需要通过增加胰岛素剂量进行紧急干预。结论:对于非糖尿病患者,不论体重和是否伴有疾病,均按标准(平均剂量)给药。糖尿病患者需要以每天0.1 mg /kg体重的速率单独确定地塞米松的剂量。这种方法降低了不良结果的风险,并确保实现临床和实验室参数的积极动态,从而最终降低死亡率并缩短恢复时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis Methods in Optimizing Corticosteroid Therapy in Patients with Covid-19 and Diabetes Mellitus
Background: The method of comparative analysis is one of the most common in science where optimal choices are required. Despite the fact the method is empirical, under the conditions of epidemics such as Covid-19, it is one of the most affordable in assessing the effectiveness of the therapy. Patients with diabetes having coronavirus infection are included in the risk group which required steroid therapy. In patients with diabetes, excessive usage of Exogenous corticosteroids creates insulin deficiency which leads to hyperglycemia and the risk of developing coma. Purpose of the study: сompare the effectiveness and safety of using corticosteroids in patients with Covid-19 and diabetes prescribed "by standards" and "method of calculation". Method: Diabetic Patients with novel coronavirus infection were screened (n = 107).All patients were divided into 3 groups.In group 1(n=35) patients received dexamethasone at a dosage of 0.1 mg/kg once a day in the morning intravenously; in group 2(n = 38), patients received dexamethasone 20 mg twice daily intravenously in the morning and evening (more than 0.2 mg/kg/day) and in group 3(n = 34) patients received dexamethasone 0.1 mg /kg once a day in the morning intramuscularly. Comparative analysis were carried out according to the criteria: the period of intoxication, glycemic variability, CRP, leukocyte counts, D-dimer, and transaminases. For analysis STATISTIC 10,0 computer program was used (Matematica®, Matlab®, HarvardGraphics®) StatSoft). Results: In all the groups after therapy it was noted redistributive leukocytosis.In patients receiving high therapeutic dose (group 2) initially suppressed production of leukocytes is activated and reaches the normative indicator (p<0.001) and the indicators are comparable to the data of group 3(p<0.001)in which patients received glucocorticoids at a lower dose (0.1 mg/kg/day) intramuscularly. The most significant decrease in D-dimer levels was in patients with a dosage of dexamethasone at the rate of 0.1 units/kg once a day intravenously by 80.9%(P <0.0001);intramuscularly by 73.2%(P<0.00001)and with intravenously at a dose of more than 0.2 units/kg there was a decrease in the level of D-dimer by 67.9% (P <0.00001). Decrease in CRP (cytokine storm relief rate) did not differ significantly between the groups, which eliminates the role of inexpedient usage of dexamethasone in dosages of more than 0.2 units/kg/day.Fasting blood glucose in patients in group 3 increased by 22% (P<0.0002); in group 1 only by 12% (P <0.05)and in group 2 by 32% (P <0.0001). In all the groups, an increase was observed in postprandial glucose, and in group 2 to the level of developing ketoacidosis and required emergency intervention by increasing the dose of insulin. Conclusion: For patients without diabetes, the dose of dexamethasone is prescribed in accordance with standards (average dose) regardless of body weight and concomitant diseases. In patients with diabetes are required to determine the dose of dexamethasone individually at the rate of 0.1 mg /kg body weight per day. This method reduces the risk of adverse outcomes and ensures the achievement of positive dynamics of clinical and laboratory parameters which ultimately reduces mortality and shortens the recovery time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信