{"title":"英国经济政策的理念与利益","authors":"A. Gamble","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529217049.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the interaction between ideas and interests in understanding the Keynesian and Thatcher eras. It uses three accounts of what is most important in shaping public policy; general doctrines about the nature of society and the role of government, such as Dicey’s contrast between individualism and collectivism; economic interests; and historical and institutional contexts. The role of thinktanks, expertise, and the competitive democratic process in developing the role of general doctrines and the climate of ideas are discussed, and are contrasted with interest accounts which rely on theoretical insights into the structure of classes or the structure of collective action or the structure of public choice. Both approaches are vulnerable to a critique employing historical methods to reconstruct the actual contexts in which public policy is made.","PeriodicalId":393570,"journal":{"name":"The Western Ideology and Other Essays","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideas and Interests in British Economic Policy1\",\"authors\":\"A. Gamble\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/policypress/9781529217049.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay explores the interaction between ideas and interests in understanding the Keynesian and Thatcher eras. It uses three accounts of what is most important in shaping public policy; general doctrines about the nature of society and the role of government, such as Dicey’s contrast between individualism and collectivism; economic interests; and historical and institutional contexts. The role of thinktanks, expertise, and the competitive democratic process in developing the role of general doctrines and the climate of ideas are discussed, and are contrasted with interest accounts which rely on theoretical insights into the structure of classes or the structure of collective action or the structure of public choice. Both approaches are vulnerable to a critique employing historical methods to reconstruct the actual contexts in which public policy is made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Western Ideology and Other Essays\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Western Ideology and Other Essays\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529217049.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Western Ideology and Other Essays","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529217049.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay explores the interaction between ideas and interests in understanding the Keynesian and Thatcher eras. It uses three accounts of what is most important in shaping public policy; general doctrines about the nature of society and the role of government, such as Dicey’s contrast between individualism and collectivism; economic interests; and historical and institutional contexts. The role of thinktanks, expertise, and the competitive democratic process in developing the role of general doctrines and the climate of ideas are discussed, and are contrasted with interest accounts which rely on theoretical insights into the structure of classes or the structure of collective action or the structure of public choice. Both approaches are vulnerable to a critique employing historical methods to reconstruct the actual contexts in which public policy is made.