软系统特刊编辑

Ann B. Toomey, Elaine Igoe, Amy Winters, Sara Robertson, Elif Ozden-Yenigun
{"title":"软系统特刊编辑","authors":"Ann B. Toomey, Elaine Igoe, Amy Winters, Sara Robertson, Elif Ozden-Yenigun","doi":"10.1080/20511787.2021.1936953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue probes the practice of textiles and material-led researchers from both methodological and applied definitions of “soft systems.” In organisational management, “soft systems methodology” (SSM) has been used for over thirty years in the analysis of complex situations where diverse viewpoints are held across a diverse group of stakeholders and the “problem” is undefined (Checkland 2000). SSM recognises flux as the only state of being and cautions against the solidification of elements of that flux as “situations, problems or issues.” Rather it suggests that social reality is continuously, socially constructed and that individuals can hold and express differing perceptions of that ever-changing social reality at any one time. The focus on ambivalent individuality and subjectivity within a flux or “liquid” paradigm of modernity (Bauman 2000) invites questions surrounding the role of materials in lived experience that are key to theories of New Materialism and Posthumanism. Concurrent explorations and integrations of technological, scientific, design and craft processes within textile and material-led systems avoid ontological permanence and move away from any preconceived understandings of textiles, fabric or cloth to examples of radical “textilic” practice (Igoe 2021). Diverse and interdisciplinary practices that are characterised by non-linear dynamics and “simplexity” (Kluger 2007) expose our relationally networked and liquid state and transcend the boundaries of material outcomes. Jo ur na lo f Te xt ile D es ig n R es ea rc h an d P ra ct ic e","PeriodicalId":275893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soft Systems Special Issue Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Ann B. Toomey, Elaine Igoe, Amy Winters, Sara Robertson, Elif Ozden-Yenigun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20511787.2021.1936953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue probes the practice of textiles and material-led researchers from both methodological and applied definitions of “soft systems.” In organisational management, “soft systems methodology” (SSM) has been used for over thirty years in the analysis of complex situations where diverse viewpoints are held across a diverse group of stakeholders and the “problem” is undefined (Checkland 2000). SSM recognises flux as the only state of being and cautions against the solidification of elements of that flux as “situations, problems or issues.” Rather it suggests that social reality is continuously, socially constructed and that individuals can hold and express differing perceptions of that ever-changing social reality at any one time. The focus on ambivalent individuality and subjectivity within a flux or “liquid” paradigm of modernity (Bauman 2000) invites questions surrounding the role of materials in lived experience that are key to theories of New Materialism and Posthumanism. Concurrent explorations and integrations of technological, scientific, design and craft processes within textile and material-led systems avoid ontological permanence and move away from any preconceived understandings of textiles, fabric or cloth to examples of radical “textilic” practice (Igoe 2021). Diverse and interdisciplinary practices that are characterised by non-linear dynamics and “simplexity” (Kluger 2007) expose our relationally networked and liquid state and transcend the boundaries of material outcomes. Jo ur na lo f Te xt ile D es ig n R es ea rc h an d P ra ct ic e\",\"PeriodicalId\":275893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2021.1936953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2021.1936953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期特刊从“软系统”的方法论和应用定义两方面探讨了纺织品和材料主导的研究人员的实践。在组织管理中,“软系统方法论”(SSM)已经使用了30多年,用于分析复杂的情况,在这些情况下,不同的利益相关者群体持有不同的观点,“问题”是未定义的(Checkland 2000)。SSM认为流动是唯一的存在状态,并告诫人们不要将流动元素固化为“情境、问题或问题”。相反,它表明社会现实是持续的,社会建构的,个人可以在任何时候持有和表达对不断变化的社会现实的不同看法。在现代性的流动或“流动”范式中,对矛盾的个性和主体性的关注(鲍曼2000)引发了围绕物质在生活经验中的作用的问题,这是新唯物主义和后人类主义理论的关键。在纺织和材料主导的系统中,同时探索和整合技术、科学、设计和工艺过程,避免了本体论的永久性,并摆脱了对纺织品、织物或布料的任何先入为主的理解,转向激进的“纺织”实践(Igoe 2021)。以非线性动力学和“简单性”为特征的多样化和跨学科实践(Kluger 2007)揭示了我们的关系网络化和液态,并超越了物质结果的界限。你看,下一篇文章的标题是“我的朋友”,标题是“我的朋友”,标题是“我的朋友”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soft Systems Special Issue Editorial
This special issue probes the practice of textiles and material-led researchers from both methodological and applied definitions of “soft systems.” In organisational management, “soft systems methodology” (SSM) has been used for over thirty years in the analysis of complex situations where diverse viewpoints are held across a diverse group of stakeholders and the “problem” is undefined (Checkland 2000). SSM recognises flux as the only state of being and cautions against the solidification of elements of that flux as “situations, problems or issues.” Rather it suggests that social reality is continuously, socially constructed and that individuals can hold and express differing perceptions of that ever-changing social reality at any one time. The focus on ambivalent individuality and subjectivity within a flux or “liquid” paradigm of modernity (Bauman 2000) invites questions surrounding the role of materials in lived experience that are key to theories of New Materialism and Posthumanism. Concurrent explorations and integrations of technological, scientific, design and craft processes within textile and material-led systems avoid ontological permanence and move away from any preconceived understandings of textiles, fabric or cloth to examples of radical “textilic” practice (Igoe 2021). Diverse and interdisciplinary practices that are characterised by non-linear dynamics and “simplexity” (Kluger 2007) expose our relationally networked and liquid state and transcend the boundaries of material outcomes. Jo ur na lo f Te xt ile D es ig n R es ea rc h an d P ra ct ic e
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信