Hana Porkertová
{"title":"Studia postižení","authors":"Hana Porkertová","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.m210-9910-2021-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The second chapter talks about the development of disability studies and its key points such as the intersection of activism and academia, the social model of disability, or interconnection of various disciplines. The ways of thinking about ability, disability, normal and abnormal bodies and people, are highly formed by the society – by education, media, expert and lay discourses ranging from medicine to social policy – and influence how cities, streets and houses are designed. Therefore, the aim of disability studies is to change the discourses and modes of behavior so that they are more inclusive. The chapter discusses beginnings of this field at the interconnections of activism and academia, and its difficult position in the Czech Republic, where it is not an established major at any university. Here, especially the public discourse revolves around the medical model of disability that sees the core of the problem in one’s impairment, instead of focusing on disabling processes leading to discrimination, which the social model of disability, pivotal for disability studies, does. However, the chapter also discusses various critiques of the social model. It tends to unify disability and thus overlooks individual differences, as well as differences between diverse regions. As a reaction to these critiques, critical disability studies were established at the beginning of 21st century. They raise questions about relevance of some older concepts and premises of disability studies in the postmodern world and late capitalism. Critical disability studies challenge the very differentiation between normality and abnormality and at the related binaries on which disability is built. Departing from the humanist perspective of the social model, CDS adopt a posthumanist perspective abandoning the notion of an independent, autonomous, Subject. They focus on interconnectivity of the social and the material, the human and the nonhuman, the organic and the inorganic. Instead of the “capability and usability of the body,” critical disability studies ask about the meanings of “ability and disability.”","PeriodicalId":267154,"journal":{"name":"Geografie bariér","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geografie bariér","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.m210-9910-2021-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第二章论述了残疾研究的发展及其重点,如行动主义与学术界的交叉、残疾的社会模式、各学科的相互联系等。对能力、残疾、正常和不正常的身体和人的思考方式在很大程度上是由社会形成的——通过教育、媒体、从医学到社会政策的专家和非专业话语——并影响城市、街道和房屋的设计。因此,残疾研究的目的是改变话语和行为模式,使其更具包容性。这一章讨论了这个领域的开端,在行动主义和学术界的相互联系,以及它在捷克共和国的困难处境,在那里,它不是任何大学的既定专业。在这里,特别是公共话语围绕着残疾的医学模式,它看到了问题的核心在于一个人的缺陷,而不是关注导致歧视的残疾过程,而残疾的社会模式,对残疾研究至关重要。然而,这一章也讨论了对社会模式的各种批评。它倾向于将残疾统一起来,从而忽略了个体差异,以及不同地区之间的差异。作为对这些批评的回应,批判性残疾研究在21世纪初建立起来。他们提出了关于后现代世界和晚期资本主义中残疾研究的一些旧概念和前提的相关性的问题。关键的残疾研究挑战了正常和异常之间的区别,以及残疾建立在相关的二元基础上。从社会模式的人文主义视角出发,CDS采用了一种后人文主义视角,抛弃了独立、自主、主体的概念。他们关注社会和物质、人类和非人类、有机和无机的相互联系。批判性的残疾研究询问的不是“身体的能力和可用性”,而是“能力和残疾”的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Studia postižení
The second chapter talks about the development of disability studies and its key points such as the intersection of activism and academia, the social model of disability, or interconnection of various disciplines. The ways of thinking about ability, disability, normal and abnormal bodies and people, are highly formed by the society – by education, media, expert and lay discourses ranging from medicine to social policy – and influence how cities, streets and houses are designed. Therefore, the aim of disability studies is to change the discourses and modes of behavior so that they are more inclusive. The chapter discusses beginnings of this field at the interconnections of activism and academia, and its difficult position in the Czech Republic, where it is not an established major at any university. Here, especially the public discourse revolves around the medical model of disability that sees the core of the problem in one’s impairment, instead of focusing on disabling processes leading to discrimination, which the social model of disability, pivotal for disability studies, does. However, the chapter also discusses various critiques of the social model. It tends to unify disability and thus overlooks individual differences, as well as differences between diverse regions. As a reaction to these critiques, critical disability studies were established at the beginning of 21st century. They raise questions about relevance of some older concepts and premises of disability studies in the postmodern world and late capitalism. Critical disability studies challenge the very differentiation between normality and abnormality and at the related binaries on which disability is built. Departing from the humanist perspective of the social model, CDS adopt a posthumanist perspective abandoning the notion of an independent, autonomous, Subject. They focus on interconnectivity of the social and the material, the human and the nonhuman, the organic and the inorganic. Instead of the “capability and usability of the body,” critical disability studies ask about the meanings of “ability and disability.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信