类风湿关节炎健康状况测量的社会维度。

R Fitzpatrick, S Ziebland, C Jenkinson, A Mowat, A Mowat
{"title":"类风湿关节炎健康状况测量的社会维度。","authors":"R Fitzpatrick,&nbsp;S Ziebland,&nbsp;C Jenkinson,&nbsp;A Mowat,&nbsp;A Mowat","doi":"10.3109/03790799109166680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fifty-six patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were assessed on two occasions three months apart. They completed two health status instruments--the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)--and the Beck Depression Inventory. In addition, clinical and serological data were gathered in order to calculate severity of disease according to the Mallya and Mace index. Health status instruments and the severity of disease index showed agreement in the assessment of mobility; similar agreement was found for different assessments of emotions. However, the two instruments provided social interaction scores with little agreement either cross-sectionally or in terms of change over time. It is argued that the generic NHP may be a valid instrument as an outcome measure in RA but the NHP and AIMS assess different aspects of social interaction. Care is needed in the selection of outcome measures to evaluate interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":77547,"journal":{"name":"International disability studies","volume":"13 2","pages":"34-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790799109166680","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The social dimension of health status measures in rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"R Fitzpatrick,&nbsp;S Ziebland,&nbsp;C Jenkinson,&nbsp;A Mowat,&nbsp;A Mowat\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/03790799109166680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fifty-six patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were assessed on two occasions three months apart. They completed two health status instruments--the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)--and the Beck Depression Inventory. In addition, clinical and serological data were gathered in order to calculate severity of disease according to the Mallya and Mace index. Health status instruments and the severity of disease index showed agreement in the assessment of mobility; similar agreement was found for different assessments of emotions. However, the two instruments provided social interaction scores with little agreement either cross-sectionally or in terms of change over time. It is argued that the generic NHP may be a valid instrument as an outcome measure in RA but the NHP and AIMS assess different aspects of social interaction. Care is needed in the selection of outcome measures to evaluate interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International disability studies\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"34-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790799109166680\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International disability studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International disability studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

56例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者进行了两次评估,间隔三个月。他们完成了两项健康状况工具——关节炎影响测量量表(AIMS)和诺丁汉健康概况(NHP)——以及贝克抑郁量表。此外,收集临床和血清学数据,根据malya和Mace指数计算疾病的严重程度。健康状况工具和疾病严重程度指数在评估流动性方面显示一致;在不同的情绪评估中也发现了类似的共识。然而,这两种工具提供的社会互动得分无论在横截面上还是在随时间变化方面都不太一致。有人认为,一般的NHP可能是一种有效的工具,作为RA的结果测量,但NHP和AIMS评估的是社会互动的不同方面。在选择评价干预措施的结果指标时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The social dimension of health status measures in rheumatoid arthritis.

Fifty-six patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were assessed on two occasions three months apart. They completed two health status instruments--the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)--and the Beck Depression Inventory. In addition, clinical and serological data were gathered in order to calculate severity of disease according to the Mallya and Mace index. Health status instruments and the severity of disease index showed agreement in the assessment of mobility; similar agreement was found for different assessments of emotions. However, the two instruments provided social interaction scores with little agreement either cross-sectionally or in terms of change over time. It is argued that the generic NHP may be a valid instrument as an outcome measure in RA but the NHP and AIMS assess different aspects of social interaction. Care is needed in the selection of outcome measures to evaluate interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信