含不同填充量的吸入性类固醇和长效受体激动剂的干粉吸入器的配方及评价

A. Jadhav, Y. Sharma, Maheshanand Giri, S. Aglawe, A. Gayke, R. Kalkotwar
{"title":"含不同填充量的吸入性类固醇和长效受体激动剂的干粉吸入器的配方及评价","authors":"A. Jadhav, Y. Sharma, Maheshanand Giri, S. Aglawe, A. Gayke, R. Kalkotwar","doi":"10.46624/ajphr.2018.v6.i9.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overall objective of this research project was to study the in DPI formulations containing ICH and LABA to achieve efficient drug deposition goals. Hence, this project focused on the formulation development of DPIs and impact of different fill weight or fill volume in performance as well as other physicochemical parameter. The performance mainly APSD of dry powder inhalers containing LABA & ICS was found to be optimum when it is formulated with 30% of fine grade lactose monohydrate. The APSD evaluation was concluded that the deposition of particle of (F8) 12.5 mg is better than (F4) 25 mg. It’s may due to more void space in the 12.5 mg capsule formulation than 25 mg capsule formulation. Due to this good turbulence occurs and separation drug particle form carrier surface is more and give better deposition compared to 25 mg fill weight formulation per capsule. The overall project concluded the 12.5mg formulation (F8) is good. These formulations are advantages over 25 mg formulation such as less carrier residue, cost effective, good therapeutic result.","PeriodicalId":233230,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmacy And Health Research","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formulation and Evaluation of Dry Powder Inhaler Containing Inhaled Carticosteroids and Long Acting Beta Agonist of Different Fill Weight\",\"authors\":\"A. Jadhav, Y. Sharma, Maheshanand Giri, S. Aglawe, A. Gayke, R. Kalkotwar\",\"doi\":\"10.46624/ajphr.2018.v6.i9.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The overall objective of this research project was to study the in DPI formulations containing ICH and LABA to achieve efficient drug deposition goals. Hence, this project focused on the formulation development of DPIs and impact of different fill weight or fill volume in performance as well as other physicochemical parameter. The performance mainly APSD of dry powder inhalers containing LABA & ICS was found to be optimum when it is formulated with 30% of fine grade lactose monohydrate. The APSD evaluation was concluded that the deposition of particle of (F8) 12.5 mg is better than (F4) 25 mg. It’s may due to more void space in the 12.5 mg capsule formulation than 25 mg capsule formulation. Due to this good turbulence occurs and separation drug particle form carrier surface is more and give better deposition compared to 25 mg fill weight formulation per capsule. The overall project concluded the 12.5mg formulation (F8) is good. These formulations are advantages over 25 mg formulation such as less carrier residue, cost effective, good therapeutic result.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmacy And Health Research\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmacy And Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46624/ajphr.2018.v6.i9.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmacy And Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46624/ajphr.2018.v6.i9.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究项目的总体目标是研究含有ICH和LABA的DPI制剂,以达到有效的药物沉积目标。因此,本项目重点研究了dpi的配方开发,以及不同填充量或填充量对性能的影响以及其他理化参数。当添加30%的优质一水乳糖时,含有LABA和ICS的干粉吸入器的APSD性能最佳。APSD评价结果表明(F8) 12.5 mg颗粒沉积效果优于(F4) 25 mg颗粒沉积效果。这可能是由于12.5毫克胶囊配方比25毫克胶囊配方有更多的空隙。由于这种良好的湍流发生和分离,药物颗粒从载体表面更多,并且与每粒胶囊25毫克填充重量的配方相比,有更好的沉积。整体项目得出12.5mg配方(F8)是良好的。这些制剂比25mg制剂具有载体残留少、成本有效、治疗效果好等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formulation and Evaluation of Dry Powder Inhaler Containing Inhaled Carticosteroids and Long Acting Beta Agonist of Different Fill Weight
The overall objective of this research project was to study the in DPI formulations containing ICH and LABA to achieve efficient drug deposition goals. Hence, this project focused on the formulation development of DPIs and impact of different fill weight or fill volume in performance as well as other physicochemical parameter. The performance mainly APSD of dry powder inhalers containing LABA & ICS was found to be optimum when it is formulated with 30% of fine grade lactose monohydrate. The APSD evaluation was concluded that the deposition of particle of (F8) 12.5 mg is better than (F4) 25 mg. It’s may due to more void space in the 12.5 mg capsule formulation than 25 mg capsule formulation. Due to this good turbulence occurs and separation drug particle form carrier surface is more and give better deposition compared to 25 mg fill weight formulation per capsule. The overall project concluded the 12.5mg formulation (F8) is good. These formulations are advantages over 25 mg formulation such as less carrier residue, cost effective, good therapeutic result.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信