大规模敏捷开发中的实践社区:系统的文献映射

Iury Monte, Lucas Lins, M. Marinho
{"title":"大规模敏捷开发中的实践社区:系统的文献映射","authors":"Iury Monte, Lucas Lins, M. Marinho","doi":"10.1109/CLEI56649.2022.9959929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agile software development has become an attractive option for companies trying to improve their performance, even though its methods were originally designed for small, individual teams. Current literature does not provide a cohesive picture of how agile methods scale into account, like large and often distributed software development projects. Some studies claim that Communities of Practice (CoPs) can be essential to successfully adopting agile practices, especially in large organizations. CoPs are groups of experts who share a common interest or topic and collectively wish to deepen their knowledge. This study highlights how CoPs are applied and used to promote and scale agile methods in large projects. To answer the research question, “How have Communities of Practice been used to support large-scale agile development teams?” we conducted a Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM) in the context of “Largescale Agile Methods” and “Communities of Practice”. Thus, from twenty-one studies, it was possible to synthesize three different themes and 13 categories that promote good practices in the adoption of CoPs to scale agile methods, including “coordination between teams”, “knowledge sharing”, and “open community”.","PeriodicalId":156073,"journal":{"name":"2022 XVLIII Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communities of Practice in Large-Scale Agile Development: A Systematic Literature Mapping\",\"authors\":\"Iury Monte, Lucas Lins, M. Marinho\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CLEI56649.2022.9959929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Agile software development has become an attractive option for companies trying to improve their performance, even though its methods were originally designed for small, individual teams. Current literature does not provide a cohesive picture of how agile methods scale into account, like large and often distributed software development projects. Some studies claim that Communities of Practice (CoPs) can be essential to successfully adopting agile practices, especially in large organizations. CoPs are groups of experts who share a common interest or topic and collectively wish to deepen their knowledge. This study highlights how CoPs are applied and used to promote and scale agile methods in large projects. To answer the research question, “How have Communities of Practice been used to support large-scale agile development teams?” we conducted a Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM) in the context of “Largescale Agile Methods” and “Communities of Practice”. Thus, from twenty-one studies, it was possible to synthesize three different themes and 13 categories that promote good practices in the adoption of CoPs to scale agile methods, including “coordination between teams”, “knowledge sharing”, and “open community”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 XVLIII Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 XVLIII Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI56649.2022.9959929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 XVLIII Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI56649.2022.9959929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

敏捷软件开发已经成为试图提高绩效的公司的一个有吸引力的选择,尽管它的方法最初是为小型的、独立的团队设计的。当前的文献并没有提供一个关于敏捷方法如何被考虑的有凝聚力的图片,比如大型的和经常分布的软件开发项目。一些研究声称,实践社区(cop)对于成功采用敏捷实践至关重要,尤其是在大型组织中。cop是具有共同兴趣或主题并集体希望加深其知识的专家小组。这项研究强调了在大型项目中如何应用和使用cop来促进和扩展敏捷方法。为了回答这个研究问题,“实践社区是如何被用来支持大型敏捷开发团队的?”我们在“大规模敏捷方法”和“实践社区”的背景下进行了系统文献映射(SLM)。因此,从21项研究中,有可能综合三个不同的主题和13个类别,以促进采用cop来扩展敏捷方法的良好实践,包括“团队之间的协调”、“知识共享”和“开放社区”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communities of Practice in Large-Scale Agile Development: A Systematic Literature Mapping
Agile software development has become an attractive option for companies trying to improve their performance, even though its methods were originally designed for small, individual teams. Current literature does not provide a cohesive picture of how agile methods scale into account, like large and often distributed software development projects. Some studies claim that Communities of Practice (CoPs) can be essential to successfully adopting agile practices, especially in large organizations. CoPs are groups of experts who share a common interest or topic and collectively wish to deepen their knowledge. This study highlights how CoPs are applied and used to promote and scale agile methods in large projects. To answer the research question, “How have Communities of Practice been used to support large-scale agile development teams?” we conducted a Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM) in the context of “Largescale Agile Methods” and “Communities of Practice”. Thus, from twenty-one studies, it was possible to synthesize three different themes and 13 categories that promote good practices in the adoption of CoPs to scale agile methods, including “coordination between teams”, “knowledge sharing”, and “open community”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信