Prima Mitha Puspitasari Setyaningrum, Murni Ramli, Yudi Rinanto
{"title":"检测高中生对病毒材料的错误概念的质量分析","authors":"Prima Mitha Puspitasari Setyaningrum, Murni Ramli, Yudi Rinanto","doi":"10.26555/bioedukatika.v6i2.10925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluasi merupakan kegiatan, untuk melihat sejauh mana keberhasilan pembelajaran telah dilaksanakan. Kegiatan evaluasi memerlukan alat sebagai pengumpul data yang disebut instrumen. Sebuah instrumen dikatakan baik apabila memenuhi beberapa kriteria. Salah satunyadengan melakukan analisis butir soal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya pembeda soal pada insrumen diagnostic materi virus. Responden penelitian berjumlah 346 siswa kelas X, XI, dan XII SMA Negeri dan Swasta di Kota Magelang. Instrumen yang diberikan berupa Assessment Diagnostic pada materi virus, yang terdiri dari soal Kolom Bukti Fakta (KBF), essay, dan Structure Communication Grid (SCG). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif untuk mengetahui kualitas instrumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan persentase validitas soal KBF dan SCG 63,2% , soal essay 100%, semua soal reliabel, tingkat kesukaran soal mudah KBF dan SCG 38,6%, soal sedang 37,1%, dan 24,3% soal sukar. Sedangkan kesukaran soal essay 20% pada kategori mudah dan 80% pada kategori sedang. Daya pembeda soal KBF dan SCG sebesar 62,2% kategori jelek, 31,5% kategori cukup, 6,3% kategori baik. Daya pembeda soal essay 60% soal pada kategori cukup dan 40% soal kategori baik. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, dilakukan perbaikan butir soal. Instrumen pada materi virus yang sedang dikembangkan, merupakan yang pertama di Indonesia. Quality analysis of item in the Assessment Diagnostic instrumen to detect misconceptions in high school students on virus material. Evaluation is an activity to see the extent to which the success of learning has been carried out. Evaluation activities require tools as data collectors called instrumens. An instrumenis good, if it meets several criteria. One of them is by analyzing questions’ item. This study was aimed to determine the validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and differentiation of problems in the diagnostic instrumens of virus material. Respondents in this study are 346 students of class X, XI, XII of public and private High Schools in Magelang City. The instrumen provided is in the form of a Diagnostic Assessment on virus material, which consists of the Facts Proof Column (KBF), essay and Structure Communication Grid (SCG). This research is a quantitative studywhich determine the quality of the instrumen. The results showed the percentageof the validity of KBF and SCG questions was 63,2%, essay questionswere 100%, all questions are reliable, the level of difficulty of easy questions of KBF and SCG is 38,6%, moderate questions are 37,1%, and 24,3% are difficult questions. While the difficulty of the essay is 20% in the easy category and 80% in the medium category.The differentiation of the KBF and SCG questions is 62,2% in the bad category, 31,5% in the sufficient category, 6,3% in the good category. The differentiation of essay questions 60% in adequate category and 40% in good categories. Based on the analysis, further improvements were made to the items. Instrumens in the virus material which are being developed are the first in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":391106,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis kualitas butir soal instrumen assessment diagnostic untuk mendeteksi miskonsepsi siswa SMA pada materi virus\",\"authors\":\"Prima Mitha Puspitasari Setyaningrum, Murni Ramli, Yudi Rinanto\",\"doi\":\"10.26555/bioedukatika.v6i2.10925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evaluasi merupakan kegiatan, untuk melihat sejauh mana keberhasilan pembelajaran telah dilaksanakan. Kegiatan evaluasi memerlukan alat sebagai pengumpul data yang disebut instrumen. Sebuah instrumen dikatakan baik apabila memenuhi beberapa kriteria. Salah satunyadengan melakukan analisis butir soal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya pembeda soal pada insrumen diagnostic materi virus. Responden penelitian berjumlah 346 siswa kelas X, XI, dan XII SMA Negeri dan Swasta di Kota Magelang. Instrumen yang diberikan berupa Assessment Diagnostic pada materi virus, yang terdiri dari soal Kolom Bukti Fakta (KBF), essay, dan Structure Communication Grid (SCG). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif untuk mengetahui kualitas instrumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan persentase validitas soal KBF dan SCG 63,2% , soal essay 100%, semua soal reliabel, tingkat kesukaran soal mudah KBF dan SCG 38,6%, soal sedang 37,1%, dan 24,3% soal sukar. Sedangkan kesukaran soal essay 20% pada kategori mudah dan 80% pada kategori sedang. Daya pembeda soal KBF dan SCG sebesar 62,2% kategori jelek, 31,5% kategori cukup, 6,3% kategori baik. Daya pembeda soal essay 60% soal pada kategori cukup dan 40% soal kategori baik. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, dilakukan perbaikan butir soal. Instrumen pada materi virus yang sedang dikembangkan, merupakan yang pertama di Indonesia. Quality analysis of item in the Assessment Diagnostic instrumen to detect misconceptions in high school students on virus material. Evaluation is an activity to see the extent to which the success of learning has been carried out. Evaluation activities require tools as data collectors called instrumens. An instrumenis good, if it meets several criteria. One of them is by analyzing questions’ item. This study was aimed to determine the validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and differentiation of problems in the diagnostic instrumens of virus material. Respondents in this study are 346 students of class X, XI, XII of public and private High Schools in Magelang City. The instrumen provided is in the form of a Diagnostic Assessment on virus material, which consists of the Facts Proof Column (KBF), essay and Structure Communication Grid (SCG). This research is a quantitative studywhich determine the quality of the instrumen. The results showed the percentageof the validity of KBF and SCG questions was 63,2%, essay questionswere 100%, all questions are reliable, the level of difficulty of easy questions of KBF and SCG is 38,6%, moderate questions are 37,1%, and 24,3% are difficult questions. While the difficulty of the essay is 20% in the easy category and 80% in the medium category.The differentiation of the KBF and SCG questions is 62,2% in the bad category, 31,5% in the sufficient category, 6,3% in the good category. The differentiation of essay questions 60% in adequate category and 40% in good categories. Based on the analysis, further improvements were made to the items. Instrumens in the virus material which are being developed are the first in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v6i2.10925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v6i2.10925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
评估是一种活动,看看学习成功在多大程度上得到了成功。评估活动需要工具作为数据收集器称为工具。乐器最好符合几个标准。一个是对谷物进行分析。本研究旨在确定病毒材料诊断的有效性、可靠性、困难程度和公分性。接受调查的人包括马格朗市X、11和12年级的高中生346名。病毒物质的评估诊断工具包括事实证据专栏(KBF)、论文和Structure Communication Grid (SCG)。这项研究是确定仪器质量的定量研究。研究表明,KBF和SCG 63.2%、100%的论文、所有的可靠性、KBF和SCG 38.6%的可行性、37.1%和24.3%的硬度。而论文困难的20%在容易的类别和80%在适度的类别。KBF和SCG的公差等级是62.2%,35%是合理的,6.3%是好的。论文的公差为60%的类别足够,40%的类别良好。根据分析结果,进行了谷物方面的改进。目前正在研制的病毒材料中的仪器是印尼第一个。高学生对高病毒材料中缺陷检测仪器的质量分析。评估是一种行为,看到学习成功的结果被考虑。对美国工具收集数据集合进行评估。很好的乐器,如果它很好吃的话。其中一个是分析问题的项目。这项研究可以确定物质病毒诊断工具中的有效性、可靠性、困难程度以及问题的不同。这项研究的回答是马格朗市10年级、11年级和私人高中的346名学生。该仪器提供的是一种对物质病毒的诊断评估形式,其包括事实证明(KBF)、文章和信息通信网格(SCG)。这项研究是衡量仪器质量的量研究。结果表明,KBF和SCG问题的有效性为63.2%,问题100%是可信的,而KBF和SCG的问题是38.6%,中度问题是37.1%,24.3%是困难问题。虽然论文的困难是容易选择的20%,而媒体的困难是80%。KBF和SCG问题的不同之处在于坏人的态度是62.2%,营养不足的比例是31.5%,良好饮食的比例是6.3%。论文的不同之处是60%在试验中提出问题,40%在好类别中提出问题。基于分析,进一步的改进正在进行中。被开发的病毒材料的工具是印尼第一个。
Analisis kualitas butir soal instrumen assessment diagnostic untuk mendeteksi miskonsepsi siswa SMA pada materi virus
Evaluasi merupakan kegiatan, untuk melihat sejauh mana keberhasilan pembelajaran telah dilaksanakan. Kegiatan evaluasi memerlukan alat sebagai pengumpul data yang disebut instrumen. Sebuah instrumen dikatakan baik apabila memenuhi beberapa kriteria. Salah satunyadengan melakukan analisis butir soal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya pembeda soal pada insrumen diagnostic materi virus. Responden penelitian berjumlah 346 siswa kelas X, XI, dan XII SMA Negeri dan Swasta di Kota Magelang. Instrumen yang diberikan berupa Assessment Diagnostic pada materi virus, yang terdiri dari soal Kolom Bukti Fakta (KBF), essay, dan Structure Communication Grid (SCG). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif untuk mengetahui kualitas instrumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan persentase validitas soal KBF dan SCG 63,2% , soal essay 100%, semua soal reliabel, tingkat kesukaran soal mudah KBF dan SCG 38,6%, soal sedang 37,1%, dan 24,3% soal sukar. Sedangkan kesukaran soal essay 20% pada kategori mudah dan 80% pada kategori sedang. Daya pembeda soal KBF dan SCG sebesar 62,2% kategori jelek, 31,5% kategori cukup, 6,3% kategori baik. Daya pembeda soal essay 60% soal pada kategori cukup dan 40% soal kategori baik. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, dilakukan perbaikan butir soal. Instrumen pada materi virus yang sedang dikembangkan, merupakan yang pertama di Indonesia. Quality analysis of item in the Assessment Diagnostic instrumen to detect misconceptions in high school students on virus material. Evaluation is an activity to see the extent to which the success of learning has been carried out. Evaluation activities require tools as data collectors called instrumens. An instrumenis good, if it meets several criteria. One of them is by analyzing questions’ item. This study was aimed to determine the validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and differentiation of problems in the diagnostic instrumens of virus material. Respondents in this study are 346 students of class X, XI, XII of public and private High Schools in Magelang City. The instrumen provided is in the form of a Diagnostic Assessment on virus material, which consists of the Facts Proof Column (KBF), essay and Structure Communication Grid (SCG). This research is a quantitative studywhich determine the quality of the instrumen. The results showed the percentageof the validity of KBF and SCG questions was 63,2%, essay questionswere 100%, all questions are reliable, the level of difficulty of easy questions of KBF and SCG is 38,6%, moderate questions are 37,1%, and 24,3% are difficult questions. While the difficulty of the essay is 20% in the easy category and 80% in the medium category.The differentiation of the KBF and SCG questions is 62,2% in the bad category, 31,5% in the sufficient category, 6,3% in the good category. The differentiation of essay questions 60% in adequate category and 40% in good categories. Based on the analysis, further improvements were made to the items. Instrumens in the virus material which are being developed are the first in Indonesia.