{"title":"在在线新闻门户网站上建立付费疫苗接种政策的宣传现实","authors":"Yona Voria Janesia","doi":"10.51544/jlmk.v6i1.2431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the framing of the news regarding the paid vaccination policy or “Vaksin Gotong Royong (VRG)” in Republika Online and Tempo.co. This research is a qualitative research with a constructionist paradigm. The research method used is framing analysis by Robert N. Entman. The framing of Republika Online and Tempo.co news is analyzed through four framing elements, which are problem definition, determining the cause of the problem, making moral decisions, and emphasizing problem solving. The result shows that Republika Online and Tempo.co construct the issue of paid vaccination policy with different framing. Republika Online constructed a paid vaccination policy as a strategic and rational effort to deal with Covid-19. Meanwhile, Tempo.co framed the issue of the paid vaccination policy as a polemic that drew a lot of criticism and rejection. The discourse strategies used by the two media can be observed through the way journalists choose diction, writing headlines, selecting sources, and the body of the news as a whole.","PeriodicalId":112384,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LENSA MUTIARA KOMUNIKASI","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Konstruksi Realitas Pemberitaan Kebijakan Vaksinasi Berbayar Di Portal Berita Online\",\"authors\":\"Yona Voria Janesia\",\"doi\":\"10.51544/jlmk.v6i1.2431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the framing of the news regarding the paid vaccination policy or “Vaksin Gotong Royong (VRG)” in Republika Online and Tempo.co. This research is a qualitative research with a constructionist paradigm. The research method used is framing analysis by Robert N. Entman. The framing of Republika Online and Tempo.co news is analyzed through four framing elements, which are problem definition, determining the cause of the problem, making moral decisions, and emphasizing problem solving. The result shows that Republika Online and Tempo.co construct the issue of paid vaccination policy with different framing. Republika Online constructed a paid vaccination policy as a strategic and rational effort to deal with Covid-19. Meanwhile, Tempo.co framed the issue of the paid vaccination policy as a polemic that drew a lot of criticism and rejection. The discourse strategies used by the two media can be observed through the way journalists choose diction, writing headlines, selecting sources, and the body of the news as a whole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL LENSA MUTIARA KOMUNIKASI\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL LENSA MUTIARA KOMUNIKASI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51544/jlmk.v6i1.2431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL LENSA MUTIARA KOMUNIKASI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51544/jlmk.v6i1.2431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究旨在确定共和国在线和Tempo.co中关于付费疫苗接种政策或“Vaksin Gotong Royong (VRG)”的新闻框架。本研究是一种建构主义范式的质性研究。采用的研究方法是Robert N. Entman的框架分析。《共和国在线》和《节奏》的框架。本文通过问题定义、确定问题原因、做出道德决策和强调解决问题四个框架要素来分析新闻。结果表明，《共和在线》和《节奏》。共同构建不同框架下的付费接种政策问题。共和国在线构建了付费疫苗接种政策，作为应对Covid-19的战略性和理性努力。与此同时,节奏。Co将付费疫苗接种政策的问题描述为一场引发了大量批评和拒绝的论战。两种媒体使用的话语策略可以通过记者选择措辞、撰写标题、选择来源和整个新闻主体的方式来观察。
Konstruksi Realitas Pemberitaan Kebijakan Vaksinasi Berbayar Di Portal Berita Online
This study aims to determine the framing of the news regarding the paid vaccination policy or “Vaksin Gotong Royong (VRG)” in Republika Online and Tempo.co. This research is a qualitative research with a constructionist paradigm. The research method used is framing analysis by Robert N. Entman. The framing of Republika Online and Tempo.co news is analyzed through four framing elements, which are problem definition, determining the cause of the problem, making moral decisions, and emphasizing problem solving. The result shows that Republika Online and Tempo.co construct the issue of paid vaccination policy with different framing. Republika Online constructed a paid vaccination policy as a strategic and rational effort to deal with Covid-19. Meanwhile, Tempo.co framed the issue of the paid vaccination policy as a polemic that drew a lot of criticism and rejection. The discourse strategies used by the two media can be observed through the way journalists choose diction, writing headlines, selecting sources, and the body of the news as a whole.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
