两相同轴旋流射流湍流模型的比较研究

A. Choudhary, V. Narasimhamurthy
{"title":"两相同轴旋流射流湍流模型的比较研究","authors":"A. Choudhary, V. Narasimhamurthy","doi":"10.1109/HIPCW.2018.8634062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assesses different turbulence modeling approaches for simulation of two-phase coaxial annular swirling jet flows. The problem selected from literature involves an analytical inlet profile for an annular liquid sheet sandwiched between two coaxial annular gaseous jets. The liquid-gas interface is resolved using the volume-of-fluid (VOF) model with continuum surface force approximation. 3D unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes simulations using up to 8.4 million grid cells and 64 HPC cores are conducted using the Fluent 17.2 software to obtain transient multiphase CFD data for this problem. Different turbulence models explored include the k-epsilon RNG with swirl modification, the Reynolds stress model (RSM), and RSM with scale adaptive simulations (RSM-SAS). Comparisons with the direct numerical results from literature suggest that the scale-adaptive simulation using RSM-SAS approach better predicts the onset of instability, liquid jet column collapse, jet mixing, vortex breakup, and the overall characteristics of this flow.","PeriodicalId":401060,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on High Performance Computing Workshops (HiPCW)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Turbulence Models for Two-Phase Coaxial Swirling Jet Flows\",\"authors\":\"A. Choudhary, V. Narasimhamurthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HIPCW.2018.8634062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study assesses different turbulence modeling approaches for simulation of two-phase coaxial annular swirling jet flows. The problem selected from literature involves an analytical inlet profile for an annular liquid sheet sandwiched between two coaxial annular gaseous jets. The liquid-gas interface is resolved using the volume-of-fluid (VOF) model with continuum surface force approximation. 3D unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes simulations using up to 8.4 million grid cells and 64 HPC cores are conducted using the Fluent 17.2 software to obtain transient multiphase CFD data for this problem. Different turbulence models explored include the k-epsilon RNG with swirl modification, the Reynolds stress model (RSM), and RSM with scale adaptive simulations (RSM-SAS). Comparisons with the direct numerical results from literature suggest that the scale-adaptive simulation using RSM-SAS approach better predicts the onset of instability, liquid jet column collapse, jet mixing, vortex breakup, and the overall characteristics of this flow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":401060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on High Performance Computing Workshops (HiPCW)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on High Performance Computing Workshops (HiPCW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIPCW.2018.8634062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on High Performance Computing Workshops (HiPCW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIPCW.2018.8634062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了两相同轴环形旋流射流的不同湍流建模方法。从文献中选择的问题涉及到夹在两个同轴环形气体射流之间的环形液体片的分析入口剖面。采用连续表面力近似的流体体积(VOF)模型求解液气界面。利用Fluent 17.2软件对840万个网格单元和64个高性能计算核心进行了三维非定常Reynolds平均Navier-Stokes模拟,获得了该问题的瞬态多相CFD数据。研究的不同湍流模型包括带有旋流修正的k-epsilon RNG模型、雷诺兹应力模型(RSM)和带有尺度自适应模拟的RSM模型(RSM- sas)。与文献中直接数值结果的比较表明,采用RSM-SAS方法的尺度自适应模拟能更好地预测不稳定的开始、射流柱坍塌、射流混合、涡破碎以及该流动的整体特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Turbulence Models for Two-Phase Coaxial Swirling Jet Flows
This study assesses different turbulence modeling approaches for simulation of two-phase coaxial annular swirling jet flows. The problem selected from literature involves an analytical inlet profile for an annular liquid sheet sandwiched between two coaxial annular gaseous jets. The liquid-gas interface is resolved using the volume-of-fluid (VOF) model with continuum surface force approximation. 3D unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes simulations using up to 8.4 million grid cells and 64 HPC cores are conducted using the Fluent 17.2 software to obtain transient multiphase CFD data for this problem. Different turbulence models explored include the k-epsilon RNG with swirl modification, the Reynolds stress model (RSM), and RSM with scale adaptive simulations (RSM-SAS). Comparisons with the direct numerical results from literature suggest that the scale-adaptive simulation using RSM-SAS approach better predicts the onset of instability, liquid jet column collapse, jet mixing, vortex breakup, and the overall characteristics of this flow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信