A. Pandey, Shibani Shetty, B JayalakshmiK, PrasannalathaNadig, I. Sujatha, Deena Elizabeth
{"title":"两种不同的脱敏剂对两种新引入的全蚀刻策略粘结剂剪切强度的影响:一项体外研究","authors":"A. Pandey, Shibani Shetty, B JayalakshmiK, PrasannalathaNadig, I. Sujatha, Deena Elizabeth","doi":"10.26715/rjds.12_1_5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Evaluate the shear bond strengths of two different dentin bonding agents following the pretreatment of dentine with two different desensitizing agents. Materials and methods: 60 premolar samples were grounded to expose the dentine. The teeth were categorized into three major groups. Each major group was subdivided into 2 subgroups of 10 samples each. Groups 1&2 involved no pretreatment with desensitizer prior to the bonding agents application. Groups 3&4 were pretreated with Gluma desensitizing agent prior to the use of All bond Universal as self-etching modality in group 3 and One Coat 7.0 in group 4. Groups 5&6 involved pretreatment with MS Coat One desensitizer and use of All bond Universal and One Coat7.0 bonding agents respectively. Shear bond testing of the samples were then evaluated by the universal testing machine. Analysis of the data was done using One-way ANOVA and pair-wise comparison was performed using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Results: Control groups in which no pretreatment was done with any desensitizing agent had the highest bond strength when compared to the experimental groups. Among the desensitizers, significantly higher bond strength was shown by Gluma than MS Coat One. Conclusion: Gluma with One Coat 7.0 can be used to decrease the post-operative sensitivity without compromising bond strength.","PeriodicalId":155332,"journal":{"name":"RGUHS Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"26 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of two different desensitizers on the shear bond strength of two newly introduced bonding agents following the total etch strategy: an in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"A. Pandey, Shibani Shetty, B JayalakshmiK, PrasannalathaNadig, I. Sujatha, Deena Elizabeth\",\"doi\":\"10.26715/rjds.12_1_5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Evaluate the shear bond strengths of two different dentin bonding agents following the pretreatment of dentine with two different desensitizing agents. Materials and methods: 60 premolar samples were grounded to expose the dentine. The teeth were categorized into three major groups. Each major group was subdivided into 2 subgroups of 10 samples each. Groups 1&2 involved no pretreatment with desensitizer prior to the bonding agents application. Groups 3&4 were pretreated with Gluma desensitizing agent prior to the use of All bond Universal as self-etching modality in group 3 and One Coat 7.0 in group 4. Groups 5&6 involved pretreatment with MS Coat One desensitizer and use of All bond Universal and One Coat7.0 bonding agents respectively. Shear bond testing of the samples were then evaluated by the universal testing machine. Analysis of the data was done using One-way ANOVA and pair-wise comparison was performed using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Results: Control groups in which no pretreatment was done with any desensitizing agent had the highest bond strength when compared to the experimental groups. Among the desensitizers, significantly higher bond strength was shown by Gluma than MS Coat One. Conclusion: Gluma with One Coat 7.0 can be used to decrease the post-operative sensitivity without compromising bond strength.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RGUHS Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"26 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RGUHS Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26715/rjds.12_1_5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGUHS Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26715/rjds.12_1_5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价两种不同脱敏剂预处理牙本质后牙本质黏结剂的剪切强度。材料与方法:将60个前磨牙磨碎暴露牙本质。这些牙齿被分为三大类。每个主要组再分为2个亚组,每个亚组10个样本。第1组和第2组在使用粘接剂之前没有使用脱敏剂进行预处理。第3组和第4组用Gluma脱敏剂预处理,第3组用All bond Universal作为自蚀刻方式,第4组用One Coat 7.0作为自蚀刻方式。第5组和第6组分别使用MS Coat One脱敏剂和All bond Universal和One Coat7.0粘结剂进行预处理。然后用万能试验机对试样进行剪切粘结试验。数据分析采用单因素方差分析,两两比较采用Tukey多重比较检验。结果:与实验组相比,未预处理任何脱敏剂的对照组的粘结强度最高。在脱敏剂中,Gluma的结合强度明显高于MS Coat 1。结论:Gluma with One Coat 7.0可以在不影响粘接强度的情况下降低术后敏感性。
Influence of two different desensitizers on the shear bond strength of two newly introduced bonding agents following the total etch strategy: an in vitro study
Objective: Evaluate the shear bond strengths of two different dentin bonding agents following the pretreatment of dentine with two different desensitizing agents. Materials and methods: 60 premolar samples were grounded to expose the dentine. The teeth were categorized into three major groups. Each major group was subdivided into 2 subgroups of 10 samples each. Groups 1&2 involved no pretreatment with desensitizer prior to the bonding agents application. Groups 3&4 were pretreated with Gluma desensitizing agent prior to the use of All bond Universal as self-etching modality in group 3 and One Coat 7.0 in group 4. Groups 5&6 involved pretreatment with MS Coat One desensitizer and use of All bond Universal and One Coat7.0 bonding agents respectively. Shear bond testing of the samples were then evaluated by the universal testing machine. Analysis of the data was done using One-way ANOVA and pair-wise comparison was performed using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Results: Control groups in which no pretreatment was done with any desensitizing agent had the highest bond strength when compared to the experimental groups. Among the desensitizers, significantly higher bond strength was shown by Gluma than MS Coat One. Conclusion: Gluma with One Coat 7.0 can be used to decrease the post-operative sensitivity without compromising bond strength.