英国房地产公司可持续发展报告分析的启示

Henry Squier, C. Booth
{"title":"英国房地产公司可持续发展报告分析的启示","authors":"Henry Squier, C. Booth","doi":"10.20900/jsr20230005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organisational sustainability reporting can act as a mechanism for the United Nations to track the progress of the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) and concomitantly provide clarity of business activities and performance to a range of stakeholders. This study aims to assess the reporting of sustainability-related matters, and notably the incorporation and prioritisation of the SDGs, across the real estate market of the UK by interrogating both sustainability and annual reports. Content analysis was utilised to consider the qualitative aspects of the text itself, subsequently a scoring process was employed to uncover a quantitative view. Results demonstrate that, although there is acknowledgement of the sustainability agenda among these companies, there is a focal cluster of SDGs that explicitly apply to the property sector (namely SDGs 11,12,13) and a leastimportant group of goals (namely SDGs 1,2,6,9,10,14,15,16), which do not relate-well with real estate activities. Based upon the calculated average quality scoring (2.19 out of 5), findings reveal firms generally convey their sustainability activities in a qualitative manner with minimal incorporation of quantitative key performance indicators. Moreover, SDG 13 achieves one of the highest scores (2.99) and this suggests the greatest focus of company intentions are directed towards climate action. However, it is important to also note that very few companies discuss specific SDG targets in their reports. Based on this evidence, it is proposed that if the companies employed goal-specific targets it would allow for a greater overview of sector performance on the goals, year-on-year, and also counter-balance concerns that firms are green-washing (or rainbowwashing) their communications and the emergence of a disconnect between proclaimed intentions and genuine measurable actions.","PeriodicalId":275909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainability Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights from the Analysis of Sustainability Reporting Across UK Real Estate Companies\",\"authors\":\"Henry Squier, C. Booth\",\"doi\":\"10.20900/jsr20230005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organisational sustainability reporting can act as a mechanism for the United Nations to track the progress of the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) and concomitantly provide clarity of business activities and performance to a range of stakeholders. This study aims to assess the reporting of sustainability-related matters, and notably the incorporation and prioritisation of the SDGs, across the real estate market of the UK by interrogating both sustainability and annual reports. Content analysis was utilised to consider the qualitative aspects of the text itself, subsequently a scoring process was employed to uncover a quantitative view. Results demonstrate that, although there is acknowledgement of the sustainability agenda among these companies, there is a focal cluster of SDGs that explicitly apply to the property sector (namely SDGs 11,12,13) and a leastimportant group of goals (namely SDGs 1,2,6,9,10,14,15,16), which do not relate-well with real estate activities. Based upon the calculated average quality scoring (2.19 out of 5), findings reveal firms generally convey their sustainability activities in a qualitative manner with minimal incorporation of quantitative key performance indicators. Moreover, SDG 13 achieves one of the highest scores (2.99) and this suggests the greatest focus of company intentions are directed towards climate action. However, it is important to also note that very few companies discuss specific SDG targets in their reports. Based on this evidence, it is proposed that if the companies employed goal-specific targets it would allow for a greater overview of sector performance on the goals, year-on-year, and also counter-balance concerns that firms are green-washing (or rainbowwashing) their communications and the emergence of a disconnect between proclaimed intentions and genuine measurable actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainability Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20230005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20230005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织可持续发展报告可以作为联合国跟踪可持续发展目标(sdg)进展的机制,同时为一系列利益相关者提供业务活动和绩效的清晰度。本研究旨在通过询问可持续性和年度报告,评估英国房地产市场中与可持续性相关的事项的报告,特别是可持续发展目标的合并和优先级。内容分析用于考虑文本本身的定性方面,随后采用评分过程来揭示定量观点。结果表明,尽管这些公司都承认可持续发展议程,但有一组重点可持续发展目标明确适用于房地产行业(即可持续发展目标11、12、13),还有一组最不重要的目标(即可持续发展目标1、2、6、9、10、14、15、16),这些目标与房地产活动的关系并不好。根据计算的平均质量得分(2.19分,满分5分),调查结果显示,公司通常以定性的方式传达其可持续发展活动,并尽量少地纳入定量关键绩效指标。此外,可持续发展目标13得分最高(2.99分),这表明公司的意图主要集中在气候行动上。然而,值得注意的是,很少有公司在其报告中讨论具体的可持续发展目标。基于这一证据,有人建议,如果公司采用特定目标,就可以更全面地了解部门在目标方面的表现,与去年相比,也可以抵消公司正在绿色洗涤(或彩虹洗涤)他们的沟通以及在宣布的意图和真正可衡量的行动之间出现脱节的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights from the Analysis of Sustainability Reporting Across UK Real Estate Companies
Organisational sustainability reporting can act as a mechanism for the United Nations to track the progress of the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) and concomitantly provide clarity of business activities and performance to a range of stakeholders. This study aims to assess the reporting of sustainability-related matters, and notably the incorporation and prioritisation of the SDGs, across the real estate market of the UK by interrogating both sustainability and annual reports. Content analysis was utilised to consider the qualitative aspects of the text itself, subsequently a scoring process was employed to uncover a quantitative view. Results demonstrate that, although there is acknowledgement of the sustainability agenda among these companies, there is a focal cluster of SDGs that explicitly apply to the property sector (namely SDGs 11,12,13) and a leastimportant group of goals (namely SDGs 1,2,6,9,10,14,15,16), which do not relate-well with real estate activities. Based upon the calculated average quality scoring (2.19 out of 5), findings reveal firms generally convey their sustainability activities in a qualitative manner with minimal incorporation of quantitative key performance indicators. Moreover, SDG 13 achieves one of the highest scores (2.99) and this suggests the greatest focus of company intentions are directed towards climate action. However, it is important to also note that very few companies discuss specific SDG targets in their reports. Based on this evidence, it is proposed that if the companies employed goal-specific targets it would allow for a greater overview of sector performance on the goals, year-on-year, and also counter-balance concerns that firms are green-washing (or rainbowwashing) their communications and the emergence of a disconnect between proclaimed intentions and genuine measurable actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信