{"title":"关键系统的弹性硬件设计","authors":"M. Farias, N. Nedjah, P. V. Carvalho","doi":"10.1109/LASCAS.2019.8667549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the constant breakthroughs in technology components, there has been an increase in the capacity and performance of FPGA. Nevertheless, new methods to keep fault tolerance at an appropriate level for critical applications in hardware must be considered, particularly due to the transient nature of some radiation-induced faults. The most commonly used methods to mitigate these faults involve redundancy, such as the Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) with the 2 out of 3 voter solution (2oo3), the most common passive method, in addition to active methods, such as the replacement of resources allocated a priori or dynamic recovery. The objective of this study is to propose a hardware architecture that increases the reliability in the use of circuits implemented in FPGAs, in addition to the one found in circuits with TMR, but without significant increase the area required by the redundant solution. The proposed solution uses comparators, a state machine-based controller and a multiplexer module to operate an architecture with three redundant modules and a spare one. The analysis shows that the proposed architecture is more reliable and keeps this reliability for longer periods of time than redundant solutions that use more area, such as the 3 out of 5 configuration (3oo5).","PeriodicalId":142430,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 10th Latin American Symposium on Circuits & Systems (LASCAS)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilient Hardware Design for Critical Systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Farias, N. Nedjah, P. V. Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LASCAS.2019.8667549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the constant breakthroughs in technology components, there has been an increase in the capacity and performance of FPGA. Nevertheless, new methods to keep fault tolerance at an appropriate level for critical applications in hardware must be considered, particularly due to the transient nature of some radiation-induced faults. The most commonly used methods to mitigate these faults involve redundancy, such as the Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) with the 2 out of 3 voter solution (2oo3), the most common passive method, in addition to active methods, such as the replacement of resources allocated a priori or dynamic recovery. The objective of this study is to propose a hardware architecture that increases the reliability in the use of circuits implemented in FPGAs, in addition to the one found in circuits with TMR, but without significant increase the area required by the redundant solution. The proposed solution uses comparators, a state machine-based controller and a multiplexer module to operate an architecture with three redundant modules and a spare one. The analysis shows that the proposed architecture is more reliable and keeps this reliability for longer periods of time than redundant solutions that use more area, such as the 3 out of 5 configuration (3oo5).\",\"PeriodicalId\":142430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 10th Latin American Symposium on Circuits & Systems (LASCAS)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 10th Latin American Symposium on Circuits & Systems (LASCAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LASCAS.2019.8667549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 10th Latin American Symposium on Circuits & Systems (LASCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LASCAS.2019.8667549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
随着技术组件的不断突破,FPGA的容量和性能不断提高。然而,对于硬件中的关键应用,必须考虑将容错保持在适当水平的新方法,特别是由于某些辐射诱发故障的瞬态性质。缓解这些故障的最常用方法涉及冗余,例如三模冗余(Triple Modular redundancy, TMR)和2 / 3投票人解决方案(2003),这是最常见的被动方法,此外还有主动方法,例如替换先验分配的资源或动态恢复。本研究的目的是提出一种硬件架构,除了在TMR电路中发现的硬件架构外,还可以提高fpga中实现电路使用的可靠性,但不会显着增加冗余解决方案所需的面积。提出的解决方案使用比较器、基于状态机的控制器和多路复用器模块来运行具有三个冗余模块和一个备用模块的体系结构。分析表明,与使用更多区域的冗余解决方案(例如3 out of 5配置(3oo5))相比,所建议的体系结构更可靠,并且在更长的时间内保持这种可靠性。
With the constant breakthroughs in technology components, there has been an increase in the capacity and performance of FPGA. Nevertheless, new methods to keep fault tolerance at an appropriate level for critical applications in hardware must be considered, particularly due to the transient nature of some radiation-induced faults. The most commonly used methods to mitigate these faults involve redundancy, such as the Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) with the 2 out of 3 voter solution (2oo3), the most common passive method, in addition to active methods, such as the replacement of resources allocated a priori or dynamic recovery. The objective of this study is to propose a hardware architecture that increases the reliability in the use of circuits implemented in FPGAs, in addition to the one found in circuits with TMR, but without significant increase the area required by the redundant solution. The proposed solution uses comparators, a state machine-based controller and a multiplexer module to operate an architecture with three redundant modules and a spare one. The analysis shows that the proposed architecture is more reliable and keeps this reliability for longer periods of time than redundant solutions that use more area, such as the 3 out of 5 configuration (3oo5).