国际法的主权和管辖权:纳图纳群岛水问题

Emiliano Octo Joaquim Beli Quintao
{"title":"国际法的主权和管辖权:纳图纳群岛水问题","authors":"Emiliano Octo Joaquim Beli Quintao","doi":"10.24123/argu.v8i2.5570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \n  \nAccording to the Greek philosopher Aristotle, humans are social creatures (Zoon Politicon) which means society, that humans need each other, therefore law exists for public order. ? As in the writing of this scientific paper, it is aimed to find out the basis of international law for measuring the territorial borders of a country, in this case the dispute over the dispute over the Natuna territory in the South China Sea. Whereas in writing this scientific paper, normative juridical research methods are used, namely data collection techniques using reference books from competent legal experts and the basics of international law through International Organizational Instruments. From the legal facts found in the historical perspective and international law that the dispute in the waters of the Natuna Islands is a legitimate sovereign territory belonging to the Republic of Indonesia, the People's Republic of China only claims unilaterally without a valid international legal basis.","PeriodicalId":321458,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KEDAULATAN DAN YURIDIKSI NEGARA DALAM PRESPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL: SENGKETA PERAIRAN KEPULAUAN NATUNA\",\"authors\":\"Emiliano Octo Joaquim Beli Quintao\",\"doi\":\"10.24123/argu.v8i2.5570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT \\n  \\nAccording to the Greek philosopher Aristotle, humans are social creatures (Zoon Politicon) which means society, that humans need each other, therefore law exists for public order. ? As in the writing of this scientific paper, it is aimed to find out the basis of international law for measuring the territorial borders of a country, in this case the dispute over the dispute over the Natuna territory in the South China Sea. Whereas in writing this scientific paper, normative juridical research methods are used, namely data collection techniques using reference books from competent legal experts and the basics of international law through International Organizational Instruments. From the legal facts found in the historical perspective and international law that the dispute in the waters of the Natuna Islands is a legitimate sovereign territory belonging to the Republic of Indonesia, the People's Republic of China only claims unilaterally without a valid international legal basis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v8i2.5570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v8i2.5570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据希腊哲学家亚里士多德的观点,人是社会性生物(Zoon Politicon),意思是社会,人类彼此需要,因此法律是为了公共秩序而存在的。? 在这篇科学论文的写作中,它的目的是找出衡量一个国家领土边界的国际法依据,在这种情况下,在南中国海的纳土纳群岛领土争端。而在撰写这篇科学论文时,使用了规范的法律研究方法,即使用有能力的法律专家的参考书和通过国际组织文书的国际法基础知识收集数据的技术。从历史和国际法所认定的法律事实来看,纳土纳群岛海域争端是属于印度尼西亚共和国的合法主权领土,中华人民共和国只是在没有有效国际法律依据的情况下单方面提出主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KEDAULATAN DAN YURIDIKSI NEGARA DALAM PRESPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL: SENGKETA PERAIRAN KEPULAUAN NATUNA
ABSTRACT   According to the Greek philosopher Aristotle, humans are social creatures (Zoon Politicon) which means society, that humans need each other, therefore law exists for public order. ? As in the writing of this scientific paper, it is aimed to find out the basis of international law for measuring the territorial borders of a country, in this case the dispute over the dispute over the Natuna territory in the South China Sea. Whereas in writing this scientific paper, normative juridical research methods are used, namely data collection techniques using reference books from competent legal experts and the basics of international law through International Organizational Instruments. From the legal facts found in the historical perspective and international law that the dispute in the waters of the Natuna Islands is a legitimate sovereign territory belonging to the Republic of Indonesia, the People's Republic of China only claims unilaterally without a valid international legal basis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信