How Many *-s Suffixes in Old Chinese? (古汉语有多少个 -s 后缀?)

Bulletin of Chinese linguistics Pub Date : 2016-06-22 DOI:10.1163/2405478X-00902014

Guillaume Jacques

{"title":"How Many *-s Suffixes in Old Chinese? (古汉语有多少个 -s 后缀?)","authors":"Guillaume Jacques","doi":"10.1163/2405478X-00902014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents potential cognates of the qusheng derivations in more conservative languages of the Trans-Himalayan family, in particular Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. It is suggested in particular that the valency-increasing uses of the qusheng could be related to the applicative -t suffix and that its valency-decreasing uses may be a trace of the reflexive -si suffix.本文將去聲構擬為*-s或*-t，並提出去聲別義可能與漢藏語系存古語言中的不同後綴同源，去聲的使動和應動的用法可能對應基蘭梯語的應動-t後綴，而被動和反被動的功能則可能是反身後綴-si的痕跡。(This article is in English.)","PeriodicalId":132217,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Many *-s Suffixes in Old Chinese? (古漢語有多少個 -s 後綴?)\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Jacques\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/2405478X-00902014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents potential cognates of the qusheng derivations in more conservative languages of the Trans-Himalayan family, in particular Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. It is suggested in particular that the valency-increasing uses of the qusheng could be related to the applicative -t suffix and that its valency-decreasing uses may be a trace of the reflexive -si suffix.本文將去聲構擬為*-s或*-t，並提出去聲別義可能與漢藏語系存古語言中的不同後綴同源，去聲的使動和應動的用法可能對應基蘭梯語的應動-t後綴，而被動和反被動的功能則可能是反身後綴-si的痕跡。(This article is in English.)\",\"PeriodicalId\":132217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-00902014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-00902014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

This paper presents potential cognates of the qusheng derivations in more conservative languages of the Trans-Himalayan family, in particular Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. It is suggested in particular that the valency-increasing uses of the qusheng could be related to the applicative -t suffix and that its valency-decreasing uses may be a trace of the reflexive -si suffix.本文将去声构拟为*-s或*-t，并提出去声别义可能与汉藏语系存古语言中的不同后缀同源，去声的使动和应动的用法可能对应基兰梯语的应动-t后缀，而被动和反被动的功能则可能是反身后缀-si的痕迹。(This article is in English.)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How Many *-s Suffixes in Old Chinese? (古漢語有多少個 -s 後綴?)

This paper presents potential cognates of the qusheng derivations in more conservative languages of the Trans-Himalayan family, in particular Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. It is suggested in particular that the valency-increasing uses of the qusheng could be related to the applicative -t suffix and that its valency-decreasing uses may be a trace of the reflexive -si suffix.本文將去聲構擬為*-s或*-t，並提出去聲別義可能與漢藏語系存古語言中的不同後綴同源，去聲的使動和應動的用法可能對應基蘭梯語的應動-t後綴，而被動和反被動的功能則可能是反身後綴-si的痕跡。(This article is in English.)

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Bulletin of Chinese linguistics

自引率

0.00%

发文量