从David Kolb的学习风格看解决文字问题的批判性思维能力

Nur Juhainah Ulfa, Dian Permatasari, Article Info
{"title":"从David Kolb的学习风格看解决文字问题的批判性思维能力","authors":"Nur Juhainah Ulfa, Dian Permatasari, Article Info","doi":"10.58421/gehu.v2i4.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe students' critical thinking skills in solving word problems based on David Kolb's learning style. The type of research is descriptive qualitative research conducted at MAN in Bantul using purposive sampling. The data collection techniques in this study were critical thinking skills tests, learning style questionnaires, and interviews. The data analysis used is condensation, data presentation, and conclusion Drawing. The results show that students' three learning styles are diverger, assimilator, and converger. Students' critical thinking skills in divergent learning styles are medium and low. The diverger student can master the average indicators of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation but cannot meet the self-regulation indicators. The student's critical thinking skills with assimilator learning style are high, medium, and low. Students with high and moderate can master all critical thinking indicators, but low assimilator students can master the indicators of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation. The student's critical thinking ability with a converger learning style is medium and low. Medium converger students can master all critical thinking indicators. Low converger students can master the indicators of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation but are less able to meet the self-regulation indicators.","PeriodicalId":201363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Education and Humanities","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Thinking Ability in Solving Word Problems Based on David Kolb's Learning Style\",\"authors\":\"Nur Juhainah Ulfa, Dian Permatasari, Article Info\",\"doi\":\"10.58421/gehu.v2i4.70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to describe students' critical thinking skills in solving word problems based on David Kolb's learning style. The type of research is descriptive qualitative research conducted at MAN in Bantul using purposive sampling. The data collection techniques in this study were critical thinking skills tests, learning style questionnaires, and interviews. The data analysis used is condensation, data presentation, and conclusion Drawing. The results show that students' three learning styles are diverger, assimilator, and converger. Students' critical thinking skills in divergent learning styles are medium and low. The diverger student can master the average indicators of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation but cannot meet the self-regulation indicators. The student's critical thinking skills with assimilator learning style are high, medium, and low. Students with high and moderate can master all critical thinking indicators, but low assimilator students can master the indicators of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation. The student's critical thinking ability with a converger learning style is medium and low. Medium converger students can master all critical thinking indicators. Low converger students can master the indicators of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation but are less able to meet the self-regulation indicators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Education and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Education and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v2i4.70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Education and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v2i4.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在以David Kolb的学习风格为基础,描述学生在解决文字问题时的批判性思维能力。研究类型是描述性质的研究在曼在班图尔使用有目的的抽样进行。本研究的数据收集技术为批判性思维技能测试、学习风格问卷和访谈。使用的数据分析是浓缩、数据展示和结论绘制。结果表明,学生的三种学习风格表现为发散型、同化型和收敛型。发散式学习方式下学生的批判性思维能力有中低之分。发散型学生能够掌握解释、分析、评价、推理、解释的平均指标,但不能达到自我调节指标。同化式学习方式学生的批判性思维能力分为高、中、低三种。高同化和中等同化的学生可以掌握所有的批判性思维指标,而低同化的学生可以掌握解释、分析、评价、推理和解释的指标。融合式学习方式学生的批判性思维能力分为中低两种。中等收敛型学生能够掌握所有的批判性思维指标。低收敛性学生能够掌握解释、分析、评价、推理、解释等指标,但自我调节指标的满足能力较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical Thinking Ability in Solving Word Problems Based on David Kolb's Learning Style
This study aims to describe students' critical thinking skills in solving word problems based on David Kolb's learning style. The type of research is descriptive qualitative research conducted at MAN in Bantul using purposive sampling. The data collection techniques in this study were critical thinking skills tests, learning style questionnaires, and interviews. The data analysis used is condensation, data presentation, and conclusion Drawing. The results show that students' three learning styles are diverger, assimilator, and converger. Students' critical thinking skills in divergent learning styles are medium and low. The diverger student can master the average indicators of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation but cannot meet the self-regulation indicators. The student's critical thinking skills with assimilator learning style are high, medium, and low. Students with high and moderate can master all critical thinking indicators, but low assimilator students can master the indicators of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation. The student's critical thinking ability with a converger learning style is medium and low. Medium converger students can master all critical thinking indicators. Low converger students can master the indicators of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation but are less able to meet the self-regulation indicators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信