书评:多萝西·理查森的记忆艺术:空间、身份、文本

P. Shurmer-smith
{"title":"书评:多萝西·理查森的记忆艺术:空间、身份、文本","authors":"P. Shurmer-smith","doi":"10.1177/096746080000700414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are insufficient superlatives to do justice to this book, which should either stimulate cultural geographers to emulate Bronfen’s immaculate scholarship or to give up the unequal struggle. Its subject is the use of space in Richardson’s four-volume opus Pilgrimage, set and written between the two world wars. The term ‘stream of consciousness’ was first coined in relation to Richardson’s work, though she was to receive less acclaim and to slip from fashion sooner than other ‘stream of consciousness’ writers such as Joyce. Richardson’s minor status is perhaps because Miriam, the ‘dull’ spinster protagonist of her novel cycle, was to become such an unappealing stereotype in the 1940s and 1950s, when feminism was eclipsed by a supposedly patriotic new femininity. Bronfen’s work impels one back to Richardson and to marvel at her project, which was to explore the developing awareness of a feminine self through a sequencing in space rather than time. Few cultural geographers today would accept Richardson’s view that the world and its people have essential and eternal characteristics which can be revealed by trying to strip away the notion of becoming, inherent in the conventional, time-sequenced narrative. However, the view that one achieves from this extraordinary position is breathtaking. In Richardson we find the precursor of Cixous’s écriture féminine, the desire to write the emotions without content and to find the person without structure. Indeed many of the devices we so readily associate with Cixous, such as the preoccupation with walls, with light, with the movement through and identification with space, are consciously employed by Richardson. Bronfen does not attempt to summarize the novels or deal with them consecutively, for Richardson herself claims that the whole work can be begun at any point and read in any order, in the same way as a person talking about herself draws upon incidents from different times. However, we must distinguish between Richardson and Bronfen. Bronfen’s work is far from being unstructured, self-centred or essentialist. It is academic in the best sense of the word, drawing upon a wealth of European philosophy and literary theory to amplify Richardson’s position. The book moves from a material to an increasingly abstracted conception of space. Part I is concerned with Richardson’s use of descriptions of place to represent episodes in the life of Miriam and demonstrates the ways in which, throughout the novel cycle. Richardson returns to particular places with a slightly altered perception of space to represent changes of mood or circumstance. So material places are symbols which shift. In Part II, which deals with Book reviews 489","PeriodicalId":104830,"journal":{"name":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Dorothy Richardson’s art of memory: space, identity, text\",\"authors\":\"P. Shurmer-smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/096746080000700414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are insufficient superlatives to do justice to this book, which should either stimulate cultural geographers to emulate Bronfen’s immaculate scholarship or to give up the unequal struggle. Its subject is the use of space in Richardson’s four-volume opus Pilgrimage, set and written between the two world wars. The term ‘stream of consciousness’ was first coined in relation to Richardson’s work, though she was to receive less acclaim and to slip from fashion sooner than other ‘stream of consciousness’ writers such as Joyce. Richardson’s minor status is perhaps because Miriam, the ‘dull’ spinster protagonist of her novel cycle, was to become such an unappealing stereotype in the 1940s and 1950s, when feminism was eclipsed by a supposedly patriotic new femininity. Bronfen’s work impels one back to Richardson and to marvel at her project, which was to explore the developing awareness of a feminine self through a sequencing in space rather than time. Few cultural geographers today would accept Richardson’s view that the world and its people have essential and eternal characteristics which can be revealed by trying to strip away the notion of becoming, inherent in the conventional, time-sequenced narrative. However, the view that one achieves from this extraordinary position is breathtaking. In Richardson we find the precursor of Cixous’s écriture féminine, the desire to write the emotions without content and to find the person without structure. Indeed many of the devices we so readily associate with Cixous, such as the preoccupation with walls, with light, with the movement through and identification with space, are consciously employed by Richardson. Bronfen does not attempt to summarize the novels or deal with them consecutively, for Richardson herself claims that the whole work can be begun at any point and read in any order, in the same way as a person talking about herself draws upon incidents from different times. However, we must distinguish between Richardson and Bronfen. Bronfen’s work is far from being unstructured, self-centred or essentialist. It is academic in the best sense of the word, drawing upon a wealth of European philosophy and literary theory to amplify Richardson’s position. The book moves from a material to an increasingly abstracted conception of space. Part I is concerned with Richardson’s use of descriptions of place to represent episodes in the life of Miriam and demonstrates the ways in which, throughout the novel cycle. Richardson returns to particular places with a slightly altered perception of space to represent changes of mood or circumstance. So material places are symbols which shift. In Part II, which deals with Book reviews 489\",\"PeriodicalId\":104830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080000700414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080000700414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

没有足够的最高级来评价这本书,它应该激励文化地理学家效仿布朗芬的完美学术,或者放弃不平等的斗争。它的主题是理查森的四卷本作品《朝圣》中的空间运用,这本书的背景和写作都发生在两次世界大战之间。“意识流”这个词最初是和理查森的作品联系在一起的,尽管她得到的赞誉较少,而且比其他“意识流”作家(如乔伊斯)更早淡出时尚。理查森的次要地位可能是因为她小说中“沉闷”的老处女主人公米里亚姆在20世纪40年代和50年代成为了一个没有吸引力的刻板印象,当时女权主义被一种所谓的爱国主义新女性气质所掩盖。布朗芬的作品将人们带回到理查森,并对她的项目感到惊叹,她的项目是通过空间而不是时间的顺序来探索女性自我意识的发展。今天很少有文化地理学家会接受理查森的观点,即世界及其人民具有本质和永恒的特征,这些特征可以通过试图剥离传统的、按时间顺序排列的叙事中固有的“成为”的概念来揭示。然而,一个人从这个非凡的位置所获得的观点是令人惊叹的。在理查森身上,我们发现了西克修斯的“ ”的先驱,他渴望写出没有内容的情感,寻找没有结构的人。的确,理查森有意识地运用了许多我们很容易联想到Cixous的手法,比如对墙壁、光线、穿过空间的运动和对空间的认同的关注。布朗芬并没有试图总结这些小说,也没有连续地处理它们,因为理查森自己声称,整部作品可以在任何时候开始,以任何顺序阅读,就像一个人谈论自己会从不同时期的事件中吸取经验一样。然而,我们必须区分理查森和布朗芬。布朗芬的作品远非无结构、自我中心或本质主义。它是最好意义上的学术,借鉴了丰富的欧洲哲学和文学理论,以扩大理查森的立场。这本书从一种物质转向了一种越来越抽象的空间概念。第一部分关注的是理查森对地点的描述来表现米里亚姆生活中的情节并展示了贯穿整个小说循环的方式。理查森回到特定的地方,对空间的感知略有改变,以表现情绪或环境的变化。所以物质的地方是会变化的符号。第二部分是关于书评的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Dorothy Richardson’s art of memory: space, identity, text
There are insufficient superlatives to do justice to this book, which should either stimulate cultural geographers to emulate Bronfen’s immaculate scholarship or to give up the unequal struggle. Its subject is the use of space in Richardson’s four-volume opus Pilgrimage, set and written between the two world wars. The term ‘stream of consciousness’ was first coined in relation to Richardson’s work, though she was to receive less acclaim and to slip from fashion sooner than other ‘stream of consciousness’ writers such as Joyce. Richardson’s minor status is perhaps because Miriam, the ‘dull’ spinster protagonist of her novel cycle, was to become such an unappealing stereotype in the 1940s and 1950s, when feminism was eclipsed by a supposedly patriotic new femininity. Bronfen’s work impels one back to Richardson and to marvel at her project, which was to explore the developing awareness of a feminine self through a sequencing in space rather than time. Few cultural geographers today would accept Richardson’s view that the world and its people have essential and eternal characteristics which can be revealed by trying to strip away the notion of becoming, inherent in the conventional, time-sequenced narrative. However, the view that one achieves from this extraordinary position is breathtaking. In Richardson we find the precursor of Cixous’s écriture féminine, the desire to write the emotions without content and to find the person without structure. Indeed many of the devices we so readily associate with Cixous, such as the preoccupation with walls, with light, with the movement through and identification with space, are consciously employed by Richardson. Bronfen does not attempt to summarize the novels or deal with them consecutively, for Richardson herself claims that the whole work can be begun at any point and read in any order, in the same way as a person talking about herself draws upon incidents from different times. However, we must distinguish between Richardson and Bronfen. Bronfen’s work is far from being unstructured, self-centred or essentialist. It is academic in the best sense of the word, drawing upon a wealth of European philosophy and literary theory to amplify Richardson’s position. The book moves from a material to an increasingly abstracted conception of space. Part I is concerned with Richardson’s use of descriptions of place to represent episodes in the life of Miriam and demonstrates the ways in which, throughout the novel cycle. Richardson returns to particular places with a slightly altered perception of space to represent changes of mood or circumstance. So material places are symbols which shift. In Part II, which deals with Book reviews 489
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信