{"title":"微机Prolog实现的性能特点","authors":"H. Berghel, G. Stubbendieck, Eric Traudt","doi":"10.1145/317559.322749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we present the results of several different categories of benchmarks performed on microcomputer PROLOG interpreters and compilers. These tests were found useful in our lab in determining optimal environments for research in several different categories of non-numerical applications. The PROLOG clause sets, as well as the benchmark results, are provided.","PeriodicalId":154705,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1986 ACM SIGSMALL/PC symposium on Small systems","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance characteristics of microcomputer Prolog implementations\",\"authors\":\"H. Berghel, G. Stubbendieck, Eric Traudt\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/317559.322749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we present the results of several different categories of benchmarks performed on microcomputer PROLOG interpreters and compilers. These tests were found useful in our lab in determining optimal environments for research in several different categories of non-numerical applications. The PROLOG clause sets, as well as the benchmark results, are provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1986 ACM SIGSMALL/PC symposium on Small systems\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1986 ACM SIGSMALL/PC symposium on Small systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/317559.322749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1986 ACM SIGSMALL/PC symposium on Small systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/317559.322749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance characteristics of microcomputer Prolog implementations
In this paper we present the results of several different categories of benchmarks performed on microcomputer PROLOG interpreters and compilers. These tests were found useful in our lab in determining optimal environments for research in several different categories of non-numerical applications. The PROLOG clause sets, as well as the benchmark results, are provided.