作为公共资源的传统农业知识

V. Reyes‐García, Petra Benyei, Laura Calvet-Mir
{"title":"作为公共资源的传统农业知识","authors":"V. Reyes‐García, Petra Benyei, Laura Calvet-Mir","doi":"10.4324/9781315161495-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter we explore the governance of traditional agricultural knowledge (TAK) under the commons framework, or the idea that knowledge can be governed as a commons, i.e., as a resource used by a group of people who have self-developed a set of rules to manage the social dilemmas derived from the resource collective use. To illustrate the governance of TAK under the commons framework, we present two case studies in which TAK is shared by communities of users who operate at different scales. The first case illustrates the local governance of TAK as commons by a close community with tight social bonds; the second case provides an example of how digitalized TAK could be governed by a peer-to-peer governance system and become part of the global digital commons. We conclude by exploring the degree to which a commons-based governance can be considered a contestation to commodification and enclosure movements that threaten th ability to sustain environmentally and culturally adapted food systems.","PeriodicalId":344826,"journal":{"name":"Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traditional agricultural knowledge as a commons\",\"authors\":\"V. Reyes‐García, Petra Benyei, Laura Calvet-Mir\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315161495-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this chapter we explore the governance of traditional agricultural knowledge (TAK) under the commons framework, or the idea that knowledge can be governed as a commons, i.e., as a resource used by a group of people who have self-developed a set of rules to manage the social dilemmas derived from the resource collective use. To illustrate the governance of TAK under the commons framework, we present two case studies in which TAK is shared by communities of users who operate at different scales. The first case illustrates the local governance of TAK as commons by a close community with tight social bonds; the second case provides an example of how digitalized TAK could be governed by a peer-to-peer governance system and become part of the global digital commons. We conclude by exploring the degree to which a commons-based governance can be considered a contestation to commodification and enclosure movements that threaten th ability to sustain environmentally and culturally adapted food systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161495-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161495-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

在本章中,我们探讨了在公地框架下对传统农业知识(TAK)的治理,或者说知识可以作为一种公地来治理,即作为一群人使用的资源,这些人自己制定了一套规则来管理资源集体使用所产生的社会困境。为了说明在公地框架下的TAK治理,我们提出了两个案例研究,其中TAK由不同规模的用户社区共享。第一个案例说明了TAK的地方治理是由一个紧密的社会联系紧密的社区共同完成的;第二个案例提供了一个例子,说明数字化的TAK如何通过点对点治理系统进行管理,并成为全球数字公地的一部分。最后,我们探讨了在何种程度上,以公共为基础的治理可以被视为对商品化和圈地运动的竞争,这些运动威胁着维持环境和文化适应的粮食系统的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Traditional agricultural knowledge as a commons
In this chapter we explore the governance of traditional agricultural knowledge (TAK) under the commons framework, or the idea that knowledge can be governed as a commons, i.e., as a resource used by a group of people who have self-developed a set of rules to manage the social dilemmas derived from the resource collective use. To illustrate the governance of TAK under the commons framework, we present two case studies in which TAK is shared by communities of users who operate at different scales. The first case illustrates the local governance of TAK as commons by a close community with tight social bonds; the second case provides an example of how digitalized TAK could be governed by a peer-to-peer governance system and become part of the global digital commons. We conclude by exploring the degree to which a commons-based governance can be considered a contestation to commodification and enclosure movements that threaten th ability to sustain environmentally and culturally adapted food systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信