探索马来西亚医学院讲师教师发展计划的领域:一项定性研究

M. Z. Mat Nor, Rusnani Ab Latif
{"title":"探索马来西亚医学院讲师教师发展计划的领域:一项定性研究","authors":"M. Z. Mat Nor, Rusnani Ab Latif","doi":"10.21315/eimj2022.14.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faculty development programmes (FDPs) are recognised to be effective mechanisms by which to enhance medical education. They cover various domains of both the clinical and non-clinical environments; however, the available data on these programmes are insufficient. The aim of this study was to explore the domains covered in FDPs conducted in Malaysian public medical schools. A qualitative approach was used for this study, which involved 30 participants from five Malaysian medical schools in 2019. The inclusion criteria for the study were (a) participants were lecturers who had served at least five years, (b) participants had experience with FDPs, and (c) participants were medical doctors. Trainee lectures were excluded from the study. Document analysis and focus group discussions were utilised for the collection of data. The data were analysed using the ATLAS.ti software and the inductive thematic analysis approach. The data analysis indicated three themes (personal attributes, professional attributes and curriculum management); six categories (communication skills, teaching and learning methods, e-learning, student management, assessment and research methodology) and 13 sub-categories namely, interpersonal communication, intrapersonal communication, adult learning, instructional models, problem-based learning (PBL), clinical-based learning (CBL), team-based learning (TBL), multiple-choice question (MCQ), single best answer (SBA), objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), standard setting, qualitative research and quantitative research. This study demonstrates the significant role played by FDPs in Malaysian public medical schools. Medical faculties are advised to incorporate all these domains into their development programmes.","PeriodicalId":130340,"journal":{"name":"Education in Medicine Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Domains of Faculty Development Programmes for Malaysian Medical School Lecturers: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"M. Z. Mat Nor, Rusnani Ab Latif\",\"doi\":\"10.21315/eimj2022.14.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Faculty development programmes (FDPs) are recognised to be effective mechanisms by which to enhance medical education. They cover various domains of both the clinical and non-clinical environments; however, the available data on these programmes are insufficient. The aim of this study was to explore the domains covered in FDPs conducted in Malaysian public medical schools. A qualitative approach was used for this study, which involved 30 participants from five Malaysian medical schools in 2019. The inclusion criteria for the study were (a) participants were lecturers who had served at least five years, (b) participants had experience with FDPs, and (c) participants were medical doctors. Trainee lectures were excluded from the study. Document analysis and focus group discussions were utilised for the collection of data. The data were analysed using the ATLAS.ti software and the inductive thematic analysis approach. The data analysis indicated three themes (personal attributes, professional attributes and curriculum management); six categories (communication skills, teaching and learning methods, e-learning, student management, assessment and research methodology) and 13 sub-categories namely, interpersonal communication, intrapersonal communication, adult learning, instructional models, problem-based learning (PBL), clinical-based learning (CBL), team-based learning (TBL), multiple-choice question (MCQ), single best answer (SBA), objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), standard setting, qualitative research and quantitative research. This study demonstrates the significant role played by FDPs in Malaysian public medical schools. Medical faculties are advised to incorporate all these domains into their development programmes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education in Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education in Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2022.14.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2022.14.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

教师发展计划被认为是加强医学教育的有效机制。它们涵盖了临床和非临床环境的各个领域;但是,关于这些方案的现有数据是不足的。本研究的目的是探讨在马来西亚公立医学院进行的fdp所涵盖的领域。该研究采用了定性方法,于2019年对来自马来西亚五所医学院的30名参与者进行了研究。该研究的纳入标准是(a)参与者是服务至少五年的讲师,(b)参与者有与fdp合作的经验,以及(c)参与者是医生。实习讲师被排除在研究之外。利用文件分析和焦点小组讨论收集数据。使用ATLAS对数据进行分析。Ti软件和归纳主题分析法。数据分析显示三个主题(个人属性、专业属性和课程管理);六个类别(沟通技巧、教学方法、电子学习、学生管理、评估和研究方法)和13个子类别,即人际沟通、人际沟通、成人学习、教学模式、基于问题的学习(PBL)、基于临床的学习(CBL)、基于团队的学习(TBL)、选择题(MCQ)、单一最佳答案(SBA)、客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)、标准制定、定性研究和定量研究。这项研究表明,fdp在马来西亚公立医学院发挥了重要作用。建议医学院将所有这些领域纳入其发展方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Domains of Faculty Development Programmes for Malaysian Medical School Lecturers: A Qualitative Study
Faculty development programmes (FDPs) are recognised to be effective mechanisms by which to enhance medical education. They cover various domains of both the clinical and non-clinical environments; however, the available data on these programmes are insufficient. The aim of this study was to explore the domains covered in FDPs conducted in Malaysian public medical schools. A qualitative approach was used for this study, which involved 30 participants from five Malaysian medical schools in 2019. The inclusion criteria for the study were (a) participants were lecturers who had served at least five years, (b) participants had experience with FDPs, and (c) participants were medical doctors. Trainee lectures were excluded from the study. Document analysis and focus group discussions were utilised for the collection of data. The data were analysed using the ATLAS.ti software and the inductive thematic analysis approach. The data analysis indicated three themes (personal attributes, professional attributes and curriculum management); six categories (communication skills, teaching and learning methods, e-learning, student management, assessment and research methodology) and 13 sub-categories namely, interpersonal communication, intrapersonal communication, adult learning, instructional models, problem-based learning (PBL), clinical-based learning (CBL), team-based learning (TBL), multiple-choice question (MCQ), single best answer (SBA), objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), standard setting, qualitative research and quantitative research. This study demonstrates the significant role played by FDPs in Malaysian public medical schools. Medical faculties are advised to incorporate all these domains into their development programmes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信