{"title":"华盛顿州立大学的电磁学教授","authors":"R. Olsen","doi":"10.1109/MAP.1989.6102062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A question arises: Should the Given updating be written i OCCAM, to get an even faster code? A simple estimate shows that in he test program, about 40 million floating-point operations were performed in 58 sec on a single transputer. This is approximately 46% of the theoretical speed. In the case of the conjugate gradient method [8], 39% of the theoretical speed has been reached with OCCAM. This, and a comparison with the test of the floating-point operations (Table l), indicates that one will probably not get a faster code with OCCAM in our case.","PeriodicalId":377321,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electromagnetics at Washington State University\",\"authors\":\"R. Olsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MAP.1989.6102062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A question arises: Should the Given updating be written i OCCAM, to get an even faster code? A simple estimate shows that in he test program, about 40 million floating-point operations were performed in 58 sec on a single transputer. This is approximately 46% of the theoretical speed. In the case of the conjugate gradient method [8], 39% of the theoretical speed has been reached with OCCAM. This, and a comparison with the test of the floating-point operations (Table l), indicates that one will probably not get a faster code with OCCAM in our case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.1989.6102062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.1989.6102062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A question arises: Should the Given updating be written i OCCAM, to get an even faster code? A simple estimate shows that in he test program, about 40 million floating-point operations were performed in 58 sec on a single transputer. This is approximately 46% of the theoretical speed. In the case of the conjugate gradient method [8], 39% of the theoretical speed has been reached with OCCAM. This, and a comparison with the test of the floating-point operations (Table l), indicates that one will probably not get a faster code with OCCAM in our case.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
