Hartmann结肠造口术患者的结肠镜检查结果

K. Kim
{"title":"Hartmann结肠造口术患者的结肠镜检查结果","authors":"K. Kim","doi":"10.31031/gmr.2020.04.000597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Colonoscopy in patients with colostomy after Hartmann’s procedure could be a quite challenging or special situation. This study aimed to analyze the Colonoscopic results in patients with Hartmann’s colostomy. Methods: Total 79 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy before reversal of Hartmann’s operation were retrospectively reviewed. The procedure was performed first through the anus for evaluation of distal colonic/rectal stump, and then through the colostomy to the cecum or terminal ileum for proximal colon evaluation. Results: Cecal insertion was possible in 72 patients; the success rate was 91.1%. The causes of failure were poor or inadequate bowel preparation in 4 patients, colostomy stricture, colonic stenosis, and angulation in 1 patient, respectively. Completeness of the bowel preparation was poor in 21 patients and inadequate in 6 patients, showing bad preparation in 33.3%. Mean Cecal insertion time from colostomy was 5.1 minute. The Colonoscopic finding of proximal part to colostomy was nonspecific in 38 patients, polyp(s) detection in 15 patients, and diverticulosis in 15 patients. In the examination of distal stump, mean length was 18.4cm, two patients couldn’t evaluate the full length of distal stump, and 11 patients showed abnormal findings including polyps, diverticular, and inflammation. Conclusion: These results suggest that most patients with colostomy can evaluate the remained colon or rectum without technical difficulty. However bowel preparation is the most important point to complete the evaluation of the colon in patients with colostomy.","PeriodicalId":130011,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology: Medicine & Research","volume":"100 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colonoscopic Results in Patients with Hartmann’s Colostomy\",\"authors\":\"K. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.31031/gmr.2020.04.000597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Colonoscopy in patients with colostomy after Hartmann’s procedure could be a quite challenging or special situation. This study aimed to analyze the Colonoscopic results in patients with Hartmann’s colostomy. Methods: Total 79 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy before reversal of Hartmann’s operation were retrospectively reviewed. The procedure was performed first through the anus for evaluation of distal colonic/rectal stump, and then through the colostomy to the cecum or terminal ileum for proximal colon evaluation. Results: Cecal insertion was possible in 72 patients; the success rate was 91.1%. The causes of failure were poor or inadequate bowel preparation in 4 patients, colostomy stricture, colonic stenosis, and angulation in 1 patient, respectively. Completeness of the bowel preparation was poor in 21 patients and inadequate in 6 patients, showing bad preparation in 33.3%. Mean Cecal insertion time from colostomy was 5.1 minute. The Colonoscopic finding of proximal part to colostomy was nonspecific in 38 patients, polyp(s) detection in 15 patients, and diverticulosis in 15 patients. In the examination of distal stump, mean length was 18.4cm, two patients couldn’t evaluate the full length of distal stump, and 11 patients showed abnormal findings including polyps, diverticular, and inflammation. Conclusion: These results suggest that most patients with colostomy can evaluate the remained colon or rectum without technical difficulty. However bowel preparation is the most important point to complete the evaluation of the colon in patients with colostomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology: Medicine & Research\",\"volume\":\"100 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology: Medicine & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31031/gmr.2020.04.000597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology: Medicine & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/gmr.2020.04.000597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:哈特曼手术后结肠造口患者的结肠镜检查可能是一个相当具有挑战性或特殊的情况。本研究旨在分析Hartmann结肠造口术患者的结肠镜检查结果。方法:回顾性分析79例哈特曼手术逆转前连续行结肠镜检查的患者。首先通过肛门进行远端结肠/直肠残端评估,然后通过结肠造口到盲肠或回肠末端进行近端结肠评估。结果:盲肠插入72例;成功率为91.1%。失败的原因有4例为肠道准备不良或不充分,1例为结肠造口狭窄,1例为结肠狭窄,1例为成角。21例患者肠准备完全性差,6例患者肠准备不充分,33.3%患者肠准备不良。结肠造口后平均盲肠插入时间为5.1分钟。38例患者结肠镜检查发现结肠造口近端无特异性,15例发现息肉,15例发现憩室病。残端检查平均长度为18.4cm, 2例患者无法评估残端全长,11例患者出现息肉、憩室、炎症等异常。结论:绝大多数结肠造口术患者均能对剩余结肠或直肠进行评估,没有技术上的困难。然而,肠准备是结肠造口患者完成结肠评估的最重要的一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colonoscopic Results in Patients with Hartmann’s Colostomy
Purpose: Colonoscopy in patients with colostomy after Hartmann’s procedure could be a quite challenging or special situation. This study aimed to analyze the Colonoscopic results in patients with Hartmann’s colostomy. Methods: Total 79 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy before reversal of Hartmann’s operation were retrospectively reviewed. The procedure was performed first through the anus for evaluation of distal colonic/rectal stump, and then through the colostomy to the cecum or terminal ileum for proximal colon evaluation. Results: Cecal insertion was possible in 72 patients; the success rate was 91.1%. The causes of failure were poor or inadequate bowel preparation in 4 patients, colostomy stricture, colonic stenosis, and angulation in 1 patient, respectively. Completeness of the bowel preparation was poor in 21 patients and inadequate in 6 patients, showing bad preparation in 33.3%. Mean Cecal insertion time from colostomy was 5.1 minute. The Colonoscopic finding of proximal part to colostomy was nonspecific in 38 patients, polyp(s) detection in 15 patients, and diverticulosis in 15 patients. In the examination of distal stump, mean length was 18.4cm, two patients couldn’t evaluate the full length of distal stump, and 11 patients showed abnormal findings including polyps, diverticular, and inflammation. Conclusion: These results suggest that most patients with colostomy can evaluate the remained colon or rectum without technical difficulty. However bowel preparation is the most important point to complete the evaluation of the colon in patients with colostomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信