悖论概念在权衡难题框架中的应用及案例研究

Q. Lu, Shuang Chen, Z. Li, Hong Yin
{"title":"悖论概念在权衡难题框架中的应用及案例研究","authors":"Q. Lu, Shuang Chen, Z. Li, Hong Yin","doi":"10.1109/ICIII.2008.242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The flexibility trade-off is one of the most enduring operations management puzzles. This paper applies a theoretical framework of paradox to a trade-off puzzle. A case study method is adopted, and the employment of Causal Loop Diagramming method for qualitative modeling of the paradox and trade-off under investigation and a greater appreciation of the dynamics and subtle ties of the systems and the multitudinous feedback cycles. The results revealed that the interaction of paradoxical elements is the underlying drive of the trade-off, demonstrating different formats at different organizational levels and recursive layers. A brief introduction to the concept of Tai-chi in Taoism also highlights the possible philosophical root. As for managers, a key implication is that both elements in the concern of trade-off and paradox have always co-exist, taking on important and complementary role; Separation of them allows specialization to occur, and co-evolution cultivates synergy to develop, new balance to reach at all organizational levels and forms of recursion.","PeriodicalId":185591,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying the Concept of Paradox to a Trade-off Puzzle Framework and Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Q. Lu, Shuang Chen, Z. Li, Hong Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIII.2008.242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The flexibility trade-off is one of the most enduring operations management puzzles. This paper applies a theoretical framework of paradox to a trade-off puzzle. A case study method is adopted, and the employment of Causal Loop Diagramming method for qualitative modeling of the paradox and trade-off under investigation and a greater appreciation of the dynamics and subtle ties of the systems and the multitudinous feedback cycles. The results revealed that the interaction of paradoxical elements is the underlying drive of the trade-off, demonstrating different formats at different organizational levels and recursive layers. A brief introduction to the concept of Tai-chi in Taoism also highlights the possible philosophical root. As for managers, a key implication is that both elements in the concern of trade-off and paradox have always co-exist, taking on important and complementary role; Separation of them allows specialization to occur, and co-evolution cultivates synergy to develop, new balance to reach at all organizational levels and forms of recursion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIII.2008.242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIII.2008.242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

灵活性权衡是最持久的运营管理难题之一。本文将悖论的理论框架应用于一个权衡问题。采用案例研究的方法,并采用因果循环图的方法定性建模的悖论和权衡的调查和更多的动态和微妙的联系系统和众多的反馈周期的欣赏。结果表明,矛盾要素的相互作用是权衡的潜在驱动力,在不同的组织层次和递归层表现出不同的形式。对道教中太极概念的简要介绍也突出了可能的哲学根源。对于管理者来说,一个关键的启示是权衡和悖论的两个要素总是共存的,起着重要的互补作用;它们的分离允许专业化发生,共同进化培养协同发展,在所有组织级别和递归形式中达到新的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying the Concept of Paradox to a Trade-off Puzzle Framework and Case Study
The flexibility trade-off is one of the most enduring operations management puzzles. This paper applies a theoretical framework of paradox to a trade-off puzzle. A case study method is adopted, and the employment of Causal Loop Diagramming method for qualitative modeling of the paradox and trade-off under investigation and a greater appreciation of the dynamics and subtle ties of the systems and the multitudinous feedback cycles. The results revealed that the interaction of paradoxical elements is the underlying drive of the trade-off, demonstrating different formats at different organizational levels and recursive layers. A brief introduction to the concept of Tai-chi in Taoism also highlights the possible philosophical root. As for managers, a key implication is that both elements in the concern of trade-off and paradox have always co-exist, taking on important and complementary role; Separation of them allows specialization to occur, and co-evolution cultivates synergy to develop, new balance to reach at all organizational levels and forms of recursion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信