巴纳特国家博物馆两幅双语铭文题记(IDR III/ 1170和178)

Amy Hendricks, Rebecca Moorman, N. Greene, R. J. Pruett, J. Hutton
{"title":"巴纳特国家博物馆两幅双语铭文题记(IDR III/ 1170和178)","authors":"Amy Hendricks, Rebecca Moorman, N. Greene, R. J. Pruett, J. Hutton","doi":"10.55201/owiq7272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ere have been six inscriptions exhibiting Palmyrene Aramaic script discovered in Romania (Roman Dacia). is article surveys all six, focusing on two fragments of bilingual inscriptions that were unearthed at the Romanperiod site of Tibiscum (IDR III/1 170 and 178). is article provides a line-by-line analysis of both texts, offering a detailed analysis of the scripts of both and offering a new reconstruction of IDR III/1 170. We argue that the revised reading of Aramaic line 1 as br tym[Ҵ] (“son of Taym[ēގ (“[requires a reevaluation of the Latin portion of individuals named in the inscription. e deceased individual remains unnamed, but his father was named Taymēގ(according to the Aramaic portion). is was not, however, the same $emhes who dedicated the inscription (according to Latin line 3މ (and was the brother of the deceased. Our detailed analysis of both epigraphs’ scripts demonstrates that they belonged to two different inscriptions.","PeriodicalId":117073,"journal":{"name":"Analele Banatului XXVII 2019","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epigraphic Notes on two Bilingual Inscriptions in the National Museum of Banat (IDR III/1 170 and 178)\",\"authors\":\"Amy Hendricks, Rebecca Moorman, N. Greene, R. J. Pruett, J. Hutton\",\"doi\":\"10.55201/owiq7272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ere have been six inscriptions exhibiting Palmyrene Aramaic script discovered in Romania (Roman Dacia). is article surveys all six, focusing on two fragments of bilingual inscriptions that were unearthed at the Romanperiod site of Tibiscum (IDR III/1 170 and 178). is article provides a line-by-line analysis of both texts, offering a detailed analysis of the scripts of both and offering a new reconstruction of IDR III/1 170. We argue that the revised reading of Aramaic line 1 as br tym[Ҵ] (“son of Taym[ēގ (“[requires a reevaluation of the Latin portion of individuals named in the inscription. e deceased individual remains unnamed, but his father was named Taymēގ(according to the Aramaic portion). is was not, however, the same $emhes who dedicated the inscription (according to Latin line 3މ (and was the brother of the deceased. Our detailed analysis of both epigraphs’ scripts demonstrates that they belonged to two different inscriptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analele Banatului XXVII 2019\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analele Banatului XXVII 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55201/owiq7272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Banatului XXVII 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55201/owiq7272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在罗马尼亚(罗马达契亚)发现了6个显示Palmyrene阿拉姆文字的铭文。这篇文章调查了所有六个,重点是在罗马时期蒂布拉夫姆遗址出土的两个双语铭文碎片(IDR III/ 1170和178)。本文逐行分析了这两个文本,详细分析了这两个文本的文字,并对IDR III/ 1170进行了新的重建。我们认为,将阿拉姆语第一行修改为br tym[Ҵ](“Taym[æގ]的儿子”)需要重新评估铭文中提到的个人的拉丁语部分。死者的名字没有透露,但他的父亲被命名为taymæގ(根据阿拉姆语部分)。然而,他并不是那个为碑文(根据拉丁文第3行)题词的$emhes,而且他是死者的兄弟。我们对两个铭文的详细分析表明,它们属于两个不同的铭文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epigraphic Notes on two Bilingual Inscriptions in the National Museum of Banat (IDR III/1 170 and 178)
ere have been six inscriptions exhibiting Palmyrene Aramaic script discovered in Romania (Roman Dacia). is article surveys all six, focusing on two fragments of bilingual inscriptions that were unearthed at the Romanperiod site of Tibiscum (IDR III/1 170 and 178). is article provides a line-by-line analysis of both texts, offering a detailed analysis of the scripts of both and offering a new reconstruction of IDR III/1 170. We argue that the revised reading of Aramaic line 1 as br tym[Ҵ] (“son of Taym[ēގ (“[requires a reevaluation of the Latin portion of individuals named in the inscription. e deceased individual remains unnamed, but his father was named Taymēގ(according to the Aramaic portion). is was not, however, the same $emhes who dedicated the inscription (according to Latin line 3މ (and was the brother of the deceased. Our detailed analysis of both epigraphs’ scripts demonstrates that they belonged to two different inscriptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信