买家是否应该通过非市场(集体)行动来塑造IT市场?网络效应交易成本理论的前因

K. Reimers, Mingzhi Li
{"title":"买家是否应该通过非市场(集体)行动来塑造IT市场?网络效应交易成本理论的前因","authors":"K. Reimers, Mingzhi Li","doi":"10.4018/jitsr.2005010103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops a transaction cost theoretic model of network effects and applies it to assessing the chances of users to influence the range of technological choices available on IT markets through collective action. The theoretical basis of the model is formulated by a number of empirically refutable propositions which overcome a number of conceptual and empirical difficulties encountered by the traditional interpretation of network effects as (positive) network externalities. The main difference between our model and modeling network effects as network externalities is that network effects are seen as caused by the costs of purchasing/marketing new technology, that is, transaction costs, rather than by the benefits of using new technology. A preliminary application of the model suggests that users can significantly improve the chances of replacing an established technology by a new, potentially superior one if they set up an organizational structure that serves as a conduit of information exchange and knowledge sharing. This, however, would call for a rather different type of collective user action than exists today in the form of user groups.","PeriodicalId":169063,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should Buyers Try to Shape IT Markets Through Non-Market (Collective) Action? Antecedents of a Transaction Cost Theory of Network Effects\",\"authors\":\"K. Reimers, Mingzhi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/jitsr.2005010103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper develops a transaction cost theoretic model of network effects and applies it to assessing the chances of users to influence the range of technological choices available on IT markets through collective action. The theoretical basis of the model is formulated by a number of empirically refutable propositions which overcome a number of conceptual and empirical difficulties encountered by the traditional interpretation of network effects as (positive) network externalities. The main difference between our model and modeling network effects as network externalities is that network effects are seen as caused by the costs of purchasing/marketing new technology, that is, transaction costs, rather than by the benefits of using new technology. A preliminary application of the model suggests that users can significantly improve the chances of replacing an established technology by a new, potentially superior one if they set up an organizational structure that serves as a conduit of information exchange and knowledge sharing. This, however, would call for a rather different type of collective user action than exists today in the form of user groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/jitsr.2005010103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jitsr.2005010103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文建立了网络效应的交易成本理论模型,并将其应用于评估用户通过集体行动影响it市场上可用技术选择范围的机会。该模型的理论基础是由一些经验上可反驳的命题构成的,这些命题克服了传统的将网络效应解释为(积极的)网络外部性所遇到的一些概念和经验上的困难。我们的模型和将网络效应建模为网络外部性之间的主要区别在于,网络效应被视为由购买/营销新技术的成本(即交易成本)引起的,而不是由使用新技术的收益引起的。对该模型的初步应用表明,如果用户建立起一个作为信息交换和知识共享渠道的组织结构,他们可以显著提高用一种新的、可能更优的技术取代现有技术的机会。然而,这将需要一种与目前以用户组形式存在的集体用户行动截然不同的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should Buyers Try to Shape IT Markets Through Non-Market (Collective) Action? Antecedents of a Transaction Cost Theory of Network Effects
This paper develops a transaction cost theoretic model of network effects and applies it to assessing the chances of users to influence the range of technological choices available on IT markets through collective action. The theoretical basis of the model is formulated by a number of empirically refutable propositions which overcome a number of conceptual and empirical difficulties encountered by the traditional interpretation of network effects as (positive) network externalities. The main difference between our model and modeling network effects as network externalities is that network effects are seen as caused by the costs of purchasing/marketing new technology, that is, transaction costs, rather than by the benefits of using new technology. A preliminary application of the model suggests that users can significantly improve the chances of replacing an established technology by a new, potentially superior one if they set up an organizational structure that serves as a conduit of information exchange and knowledge sharing. This, however, would call for a rather different type of collective user action than exists today in the form of user groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信