宽恕虐待——道德批判

P. Horsfield
{"title":"宽恕虐待——道德批判","authors":"P. Horsfield","doi":"10.1300/J154V04N04_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that most Christian understandings and practices of forgiveness have lost the ethical framework that gives forgiveness meaning and makes forgiveness effective as a means of resolving the effects of abuse on individuals, communities and the abuser. From the context of a number of practical cases, it explores common Christian misconceptions about forgiveness, deconstructs common Christian practices, and offers a number of conditions that need to be present if forgiveness is to be recovered as an ethical action. The traditional Samoan practice of Ifonga is explored as an example of a communal and ethical means of redressing wrong within which forgiveness is embodied.","PeriodicalId":165629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Abuse","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forgiving abuse - An ethical critique\",\"authors\":\"P. Horsfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J154V04N04_05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that most Christian understandings and practices of forgiveness have lost the ethical framework that gives forgiveness meaning and makes forgiveness effective as a means of resolving the effects of abuse on individuals, communities and the abuser. From the context of a number of practical cases, it explores common Christian misconceptions about forgiveness, deconstructs common Christian practices, and offers a number of conditions that need to be present if forgiveness is to be recovered as an ethical action. The traditional Samoan practice of Ifonga is explored as an example of a communal and ethical means of redressing wrong within which forgiveness is embodied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Religion & Abuse\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Religion & Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J154V04N04_05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J154V04N04_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文认为,大多数基督徒对宽恕的理解和实践已经失去了赋予宽恕意义的伦理框架,并使宽恕成为解决虐待对个人、社区和施虐者影响的有效手段。从许多实际案例的背景下,它探讨了基督教对宽恕的常见误解,解构了常见的基督教实践,并提供了一些需要存在的条件,如果宽恕被恢复为一种道德行为。萨摩亚传统的Ifonga习俗作为一种体现宽恕的公共和道德的纠正错误方法的例子进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forgiving abuse - An ethical critique
This article argues that most Christian understandings and practices of forgiveness have lost the ethical framework that gives forgiveness meaning and makes forgiveness effective as a means of resolving the effects of abuse on individuals, communities and the abuser. From the context of a number of practical cases, it explores common Christian misconceptions about forgiveness, deconstructs common Christian practices, and offers a number of conditions that need to be present if forgiveness is to be recovered as an ethical action. The traditional Samoan practice of Ifonga is explored as an example of a communal and ethical means of redressing wrong within which forgiveness is embodied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信