W. Włodarczyk
{"title":"Uwagi o pandemii COVID-19 w Polsce. Perspektywa polityki zdrowotnej","authors":"W. Włodarczyk","doi":"10.4467/20842627OZ.20.013.12766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remarks on COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland. A Health Policy Perspective Occurrence of the COVID-19 Pandemic was totally unexpected, and governments of all countries were surprised. Pandemics always raises the feel­ing of fear and health policy is interested in such phenomena. In this specific case it was fully justified as COVID-19 was new and unknown. Every­where the populations found themselves in psychological position presented years ago by Ulrich Beck in book Risk Society. Influencing and shaping society’s emotions – both feelings of safety and feelings of fear had a fundamental importance for social behaviour. In time when first information about COVID-19 came from China and Poland was still free from any infection, the government’s representatives tried to play down the seriousness of the virus and equated the COVID-19 to a seasonal flu. At that time, it could have been justified as an attempt to avoid panic. But with the first episodes of infections the tone of messages essentially changed, and the virus was presented as a lethal danger. Such a con­text was applied as a direct rationalization of general lockdown and a broad catalogue of restrictions in social contacts. However, when The Presidential Election was approaching (with the act of balloting demanding presence of people in a polling station), the content of messages presented to the public changed again. In the new version the virus itself was shown as rather innocent and the pandemic was contained and under control. In this way all voters, including elderly people, were encouraged to take part in the election. If lessons are to be drawn from the past, we might conclude that in time of a pandemic, the instrumental management of social emotions and feel­ings is not always the best way of communicating with the general public.","PeriodicalId":139863,"journal":{"name":"Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20842627OZ.20.013.12766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

就波兰新冠肺炎疫情发表讲话。COVID-19大流行的发生完全出乎意料,各国政府都感到惊讶。流行病总是让人感到恐惧,卫生政策对这种现象很感兴趣。在这个具体案例中,这是完全合理的,因为COVID-19是新的和未知的。各地的人们都发现自己处于多年前乌尔里希·贝克(Ulrich Beck)在《风险社会》(Risk Society)一书中提出的心理状态。影响和塑造社会情绪——安全感和恐惧感对社会行为具有根本的重要性。当有关COVID-19的第一个信息来自中国,波兰仍然没有任何感染时,政府代表试图淡化病毒的严重性,并将COVID-19等同于季节性流感。在当时,此举可能被认为是为了避免恐慌。但随着感染的第一次发作,信息的基调基本上改变了,病毒被认为是致命的危险。这一背景是对全面封锁和广泛的社会接触限制目录的直接合理化。但是,随着总统选举的临近(要求到投票站投票的行为),向国民传达的信息内容又发生了变化。在新版本中,病毒本身表现得相当无害,大流行得到了遏制和控制。通过这种方式,包括老年人在内的所有选民都被鼓励参加选举。如果要从过去吸取教训,我们可以得出结论,在大流行时期,对社会情绪和感情的工具性管理并不总是与公众沟通的最佳方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uwagi o pandemii COVID-19 w Polsce. Perspektywa polityki zdrowotnej
Remarks on COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland. A Health Policy Perspective Occurrence of the COVID-19 Pandemic was totally unexpected, and governments of all countries were surprised. Pandemics always raises the feel­ing of fear and health policy is interested in such phenomena. In this specific case it was fully justified as COVID-19 was new and unknown. Every­where the populations found themselves in psychological position presented years ago by Ulrich Beck in book Risk Society. Influencing and shaping society’s emotions – both feelings of safety and feelings of fear had a fundamental importance for social behaviour. In time when first information about COVID-19 came from China and Poland was still free from any infection, the government’s representatives tried to play down the seriousness of the virus and equated the COVID-19 to a seasonal flu. At that time, it could have been justified as an attempt to avoid panic. But with the first episodes of infections the tone of messages essentially changed, and the virus was presented as a lethal danger. Such a con­text was applied as a direct rationalization of general lockdown and a broad catalogue of restrictions in social contacts. However, when The Presidential Election was approaching (with the act of balloting demanding presence of people in a polling station), the content of messages presented to the public changed again. In the new version the virus itself was shown as rather innocent and the pandemic was contained and under control. In this way all voters, including elderly people, were encouraged to take part in the election. If lessons are to be drawn from the past, we might conclude that in time of a pandemic, the instrumental management of social emotions and feel­ings is not always the best way of communicating with the general public.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信