乌克兰初步侦查制度改革背景下刑事犯罪研究所的启动

V. Cherniei, S. Cherniavskyi
{"title":"乌克兰初步侦查制度改革背景下刑事犯罪研究所的启动","authors":"V. Cherniei, S. Cherniavskyi","doi":"10.33270/01191123.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the basis of the analysis of the legislation development, law enforcement practice, doctrinal approaches and foreign experience, the perspectives of introduction of simplified procedure of pre-trial investigation in Ukraine were expressed. The purpose of the article is to elucidate the historical background and to analyze the foreign experience of the simplified criminal procedure. It is noted that simplified criminal proceedings have been known since Roman times, where the offenses were divided into crimes, torts and misdemeanors. Subsequently, under the influence of Roman law, the institute was enshrined in the legal systems of most countries, including the Romano-German legal family. In the USSR, the differentiation of the criminal procedural form was reduced to protocol proceedings for certain non-serious crimes. Simplified proceedings, in varying legal interpretations, are now being successfully applied in criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Germany, the Czech Republic and other countries. By The Law of Ukraine «On Amending Certain Legislative Acts Concerning Simplification of Pre-Trial Investigation of Certain Categories of Criminal Offences» (No. 2617-VIII of November 22, 2018) the Institute of Criminal Offenses in the domestic legal field was introduced.  This Law clearly delineated the categories of criminal offenses, agreed on terms of trial for criminal offenses; determined the status of subjects authorized to conduct pre-trial investigation in the form of inquiry; specified list of procedural means of evidence collection and procedure for applying convictions of offenders, etc. The scientific novelty of the article is the problematic issues of introduction of the Institute of Criminal Offenses in Ukraine which is highlighted and separate steps that are proposed to solve them. At the same time, many legal provisions (at the level of the Draft Law) have been «an Apple of Discord» for a large number of specialists. For example the definition of the basic concept of criminal misconduct and procedural regulation of pre-trial investigation in the form of inquiries to purely practical issues, in particular the development of algorithms for actions of investigative bodies in connection with the transfer of criminal investigations that have already been started, as well as the role of prosecutors and judges during the preparation, transfer and adoption of indictments. The opponents of the Law also believe that for a simplified investigation procedure it will now be sufficient to admit guilt to a person who has not even been provided with qualified legal assistance. According to the results of the study, conclusions are made. Thus, an important step towards the entry into force of the Law is to prepare and adopt so-called «point-by-point» changes to almost a hundred other Laws and by-laws, not just procedural ones. Therefore, solving the problems of introducing a simplified procedure for pre-trial investigation in Ukraine requires in-depth scientific analysis, based on the combined efforts of scientists, practitioners and representatives of public authorities. \nKeywords: criminal offense; inquiry; pre-trial investigation; law enforcement agencies; National Police; police training system.","PeriodicalId":111799,"journal":{"name":"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initiation of the Institute of Criminal Offenses in the Context of Reforming the Preliminary Investigation System in Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"V. Cherniei, S. Cherniavskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.33270/01191123.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the basis of the analysis of the legislation development, law enforcement practice, doctrinal approaches and foreign experience, the perspectives of introduction of simplified procedure of pre-trial investigation in Ukraine were expressed. The purpose of the article is to elucidate the historical background and to analyze the foreign experience of the simplified criminal procedure. It is noted that simplified criminal proceedings have been known since Roman times, where the offenses were divided into crimes, torts and misdemeanors. Subsequently, under the influence of Roman law, the institute was enshrined in the legal systems of most countries, including the Romano-German legal family. In the USSR, the differentiation of the criminal procedural form was reduced to protocol proceedings for certain non-serious crimes. Simplified proceedings, in varying legal interpretations, are now being successfully applied in criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Germany, the Czech Republic and other countries. By The Law of Ukraine «On Amending Certain Legislative Acts Concerning Simplification of Pre-Trial Investigation of Certain Categories of Criminal Offences» (No. 2617-VIII of November 22, 2018) the Institute of Criminal Offenses in the domestic legal field was introduced.  This Law clearly delineated the categories of criminal offenses, agreed on terms of trial for criminal offenses; determined the status of subjects authorized to conduct pre-trial investigation in the form of inquiry; specified list of procedural means of evidence collection and procedure for applying convictions of offenders, etc. The scientific novelty of the article is the problematic issues of introduction of the Institute of Criminal Offenses in Ukraine which is highlighted and separate steps that are proposed to solve them. At the same time, many legal provisions (at the level of the Draft Law) have been «an Apple of Discord» for a large number of specialists. For example the definition of the basic concept of criminal misconduct and procedural regulation of pre-trial investigation in the form of inquiries to purely practical issues, in particular the development of algorithms for actions of investigative bodies in connection with the transfer of criminal investigations that have already been started, as well as the role of prosecutors and judges during the preparation, transfer and adoption of indictments. The opponents of the Law also believe that for a simplified investigation procedure it will now be sufficient to admit guilt to a person who has not even been provided with qualified legal assistance. According to the results of the study, conclusions are made. Thus, an important step towards the entry into force of the Law is to prepare and adopt so-called «point-by-point» changes to almost a hundred other Laws and by-laws, not just procedural ones. Therefore, solving the problems of introducing a simplified procedure for pre-trial investigation in Ukraine requires in-depth scientific analysis, based on the combined efforts of scientists, practitioners and representatives of public authorities. \\nKeywords: criminal offense; inquiry; pre-trial investigation; law enforcement agencies; National Police; police training system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33270/01191123.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33270/01191123.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在分析乌克兰的立法发展、执法实践、理论途径和国外经验的基础上,对乌克兰引入审前调查简化程序提出了展望。本文旨在阐明我国刑事程序简化的历史背景,分析国外刑事程序简化的经验。值得注意的是,自罗马时代以来,简化了刑事诉讼程序,将犯罪分为犯罪、侵权和轻罪。随后,在罗马法的影响下,该研究所被载入大多数国家的法律体系,包括罗马-德国法系。在苏联,刑事诉讼形式的区分被简化为针对某些非严重罪行的议定书诉讼。在不同的法律解释下,简化程序目前正成功地适用于联合王国、美国、法国、德国、捷克共和国和其他国家的刑事诉讼。根据乌克兰“关于修改简化某些类型刑事犯罪审前调查的某些立法行为”的法律(2018年11月22日第2617-VIII号),在国内法律领域引入了刑事犯罪研究所。本法明确界定了刑事犯罪的种类,约定了刑事犯罪的审判条件;确定被授权以询问形式进行审前调查的对象的地位;明确的证据收集程序和对违法者定罪的适用程序等。文章的科学新颖性在于突出了乌克兰刑事犯罪研究所的引入问题,并提出了解决这些问题的单独步骤。与此同时,许多法律条款(在法律草案层面)已经成为大量专家的“不和之源”。例如,对犯罪行为的基本概念的定义和对审判前调查的程序性规定,其形式是对纯实际问题进行调查,特别是为调查机构在移交已经开始的刑事调查时所采取的行动拟订算法,以及检察官和法官在准备、移交和通过起诉书期间的作用。该法律的反对者还认为,为了简化调查程序,现在只要向一个甚至没有得到合格法律援助的人承认有罪就足够了。根据研究结果,得出结论。因此,使该法生效的一个重要步骤是准备和通过所谓的“逐点”修改近100项其他法律和附则,而不仅仅是程序性的修改。因此,解决在乌克兰实行简化的审前调查程序的问题需要在科学家、从业人员和公共当局代表共同努力的基础上进行深入的科学分析。关键词:刑事犯罪;调查;审前调查;执法机构;国家警察;警察培训体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initiation of the Institute of Criminal Offenses in the Context of Reforming the Preliminary Investigation System in Ukraine
On the basis of the analysis of the legislation development, law enforcement practice, doctrinal approaches and foreign experience, the perspectives of introduction of simplified procedure of pre-trial investigation in Ukraine were expressed. The purpose of the article is to elucidate the historical background and to analyze the foreign experience of the simplified criminal procedure. It is noted that simplified criminal proceedings have been known since Roman times, where the offenses were divided into crimes, torts and misdemeanors. Subsequently, under the influence of Roman law, the institute was enshrined in the legal systems of most countries, including the Romano-German legal family. In the USSR, the differentiation of the criminal procedural form was reduced to protocol proceedings for certain non-serious crimes. Simplified proceedings, in varying legal interpretations, are now being successfully applied in criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Germany, the Czech Republic and other countries. By The Law of Ukraine «On Amending Certain Legislative Acts Concerning Simplification of Pre-Trial Investigation of Certain Categories of Criminal Offences» (No. 2617-VIII of November 22, 2018) the Institute of Criminal Offenses in the domestic legal field was introduced.  This Law clearly delineated the categories of criminal offenses, agreed on terms of trial for criminal offenses; determined the status of subjects authorized to conduct pre-trial investigation in the form of inquiry; specified list of procedural means of evidence collection and procedure for applying convictions of offenders, etc. The scientific novelty of the article is the problematic issues of introduction of the Institute of Criminal Offenses in Ukraine which is highlighted and separate steps that are proposed to solve them. At the same time, many legal provisions (at the level of the Draft Law) have been «an Apple of Discord» for a large number of specialists. For example the definition of the basic concept of criminal misconduct and procedural regulation of pre-trial investigation in the form of inquiries to purely practical issues, in particular the development of algorithms for actions of investigative bodies in connection with the transfer of criminal investigations that have already been started, as well as the role of prosecutors and judges during the preparation, transfer and adoption of indictments. The opponents of the Law also believe that for a simplified investigation procedure it will now be sufficient to admit guilt to a person who has not even been provided with qualified legal assistance. According to the results of the study, conclusions are made. Thus, an important step towards the entry into force of the Law is to prepare and adopt so-called «point-by-point» changes to almost a hundred other Laws and by-laws, not just procedural ones. Therefore, solving the problems of introducing a simplified procedure for pre-trial investigation in Ukraine requires in-depth scientific analysis, based on the combined efforts of scientists, practitioners and representatives of public authorities. Keywords: criminal offense; inquiry; pre-trial investigation; law enforcement agencies; National Police; police training system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信