北方山齿鹑易位后的高度变化的秋季呼唤率

J. Palarski, Shelby R. Simons, Bradley W Kubečka, Theron M. Terhune, Gregory M. Hagan
{"title":"北方山齿鹑易位后的高度变化的秋季呼唤率","authors":"J. Palarski, Shelby R. Simons, Bradley W Kubečka, Theron M. Terhune, Gregory M. Hagan","doi":"10.7290/nqsp09pds4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fall covey counts are a popular index for monitoring population trends of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus; hereafter, bobwhite), but their utility is tenuous under different scenarios. Detecting an individual covey is the product of the probability that the covey’s activity center is located within the sampling frame, the probability the covey is located within the sampling frame during the sampling periods, the probability of the covey vocalizing, and the probability an observer will detect a calling covey. Researchers attempt to maximize detection or account for these potential sources of error using standardized protocol of limiting counts to certain weather conditions, replication, and distance sampling. Variation in calling rates across a range of bobwhite densities could lead to tenuous inference of population abundance from fall covey counts, particularly at low densities. Our objectives were to assess fall calling rates at 2 sites with low bobwhite density during population restoration. Our study sites were located in Erath County, Texas, USA and Leon County, Florida, USA and received translocated bobwhite during 2019 and 2020. We hypothesized calling rates would be influenced by the number of adjacent coveys that called, and thus, would be low for our sites. Although we did not estimate bobwhite density on our study sites, we surmised that their respective populations were <1 bird/3 ha. Calling rate at the Erath County site was 0 in 2019 (n = 10 counts) and increased to 0.79 (standard error [SE] = 0.07, n = 34 counts) in 2020. Calling rate was assessed only in 2020 at the Leon County site and averaged 0.13 (SE = 0.07, n = 23 counts). Detection rate at count stations was 0 in 2019 and 0.78 (SE = 0.08, n = 27 calling coveys) in 2020 at the Erath County site. In 2020, detection rate at count stations was 0 (n = 3 calling coveys) at the Leon County site. We documented high annual variation in calling rates among low-abundance sites, suggesting researchers should seek to empirically estimate this parameter rather than applying arbitrary correction factors based on previous literature. Low and variable calling rates limit detection and can bias inference. Citation: Palarski, J., S. Simons, B. W. Kubečka, T. M. Terhune II, and G. Hagan. 2022. Highly variable autumn calling rates of northern bobwhite following translocation. National Quail Symposium Proceedings 9:130–135. https://doi.org/10.7290/ nqsp09PDs4","PeriodicalId":205881,"journal":{"name":"National Quail Symposium Proceedings","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Highly Variable Autumn Calling Rates of Northern Bobwhite Following Translocation\",\"authors\":\"J. Palarski, Shelby R. Simons, Bradley W Kubečka, Theron M. Terhune, Gregory M. Hagan\",\"doi\":\"10.7290/nqsp09pds4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fall covey counts are a popular index for monitoring population trends of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus; hereafter, bobwhite), but their utility is tenuous under different scenarios. Detecting an individual covey is the product of the probability that the covey’s activity center is located within the sampling frame, the probability the covey is located within the sampling frame during the sampling periods, the probability of the covey vocalizing, and the probability an observer will detect a calling covey. Researchers attempt to maximize detection or account for these potential sources of error using standardized protocol of limiting counts to certain weather conditions, replication, and distance sampling. Variation in calling rates across a range of bobwhite densities could lead to tenuous inference of population abundance from fall covey counts, particularly at low densities. Our objectives were to assess fall calling rates at 2 sites with low bobwhite density during population restoration. Our study sites were located in Erath County, Texas, USA and Leon County, Florida, USA and received translocated bobwhite during 2019 and 2020. We hypothesized calling rates would be influenced by the number of adjacent coveys that called, and thus, would be low for our sites. Although we did not estimate bobwhite density on our study sites, we surmised that their respective populations were <1 bird/3 ha. Calling rate at the Erath County site was 0 in 2019 (n = 10 counts) and increased to 0.79 (standard error [SE] = 0.07, n = 34 counts) in 2020. Calling rate was assessed only in 2020 at the Leon County site and averaged 0.13 (SE = 0.07, n = 23 counts). Detection rate at count stations was 0 in 2019 and 0.78 (SE = 0.08, n = 27 calling coveys) in 2020 at the Erath County site. In 2020, detection rate at count stations was 0 (n = 3 calling coveys) at the Leon County site. We documented high annual variation in calling rates among low-abundance sites, suggesting researchers should seek to empirically estimate this parameter rather than applying arbitrary correction factors based on previous literature. Low and variable calling rates limit detection and can bias inference. Citation: Palarski, J., S. Simons, B. W. Kubečka, T. M. Terhune II, and G. Hagan. 2022. Highly variable autumn calling rates of northern bobwhite following translocation. National Quail Symposium Proceedings 9:130–135. https://doi.org/10.7290/ nqsp09PDs4\",\"PeriodicalId\":205881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Quail Symposium Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Quail Symposium Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7290/nqsp09pds4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Quail Symposium Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7290/nqsp09pds4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

秋季种群数量是监测北山齿鹑(Colinus virginianus;但在不同的情况下,它们的效用是脆弱的。检测单个covey是该covey的活动中心位于采样帧内的概率、该covey在采样期间位于采样帧内的概率、该covey发声的概率以及观察者将检测到呼叫covey的概率的乘积。研究人员试图最大限度地检测或解释这些潜在的错误来源,使用标准化的协议,将计数限制在特定的天气条件下,复制和距离采样。在不同的山齿鹑密度范围内,鸣叫率的变化可能会导致从秋季小鹰数量中得出的种群丰度的微弱推断,特别是在低密度的情况下。我们的目的是评估2个低山齿鹑密度地点在种群恢复期间的秋季呼唤率。我们的研究地点位于美国德克萨斯州的伊拉斯县和美国佛罗里达州的莱昂县,并在2019年和2020年期间接收了易位的山齿鹑。我们假设呼叫率会受到相邻的鸦的数量的影响,因此,对于我们的站点来说,呼叫率会很低。虽然我们没有估计研究地点的山齿鹑密度,但我们推测它们各自的种群数量<1只/3公顷。2019年Erath县站点的呼叫率为0 (n = 10个计数),到2020年增加到0.79(标准误差[SE] = 0.07, n = 34个计数)。仅在2020年评估了Leon县站点的呼叫率,平均为0.13 (SE = 0.07, n = 23个计数)。在Erath县站点,2019年检出率为0,2020年检出率为0.78 (SE = 0.08, n = 27只)。2020年,利昂县监测站的检出率为0 (n = 3只呼叫鸟)。我们记录了低丰度地点呼唤率的高年变化,建议研究人员应该寻求经验估计这个参数,而不是基于先前的文献应用任意的校正因子。低和可变的调用率限制了检测和可能的偏差推理。引文:Palarski, J., S. Simons, B. W. kube ka, T. M. Terhune II和G. Hagan, 2022。北方山齿鹑在迁移后的秋季呼唤率变化很大。全国鹌鹑研讨会论文集9:130-135。https://doi.org/10.7290/ nqsp09PDs4
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Highly Variable Autumn Calling Rates of Northern Bobwhite Following Translocation
Fall covey counts are a popular index for monitoring population trends of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus; hereafter, bobwhite), but their utility is tenuous under different scenarios. Detecting an individual covey is the product of the probability that the covey’s activity center is located within the sampling frame, the probability the covey is located within the sampling frame during the sampling periods, the probability of the covey vocalizing, and the probability an observer will detect a calling covey. Researchers attempt to maximize detection or account for these potential sources of error using standardized protocol of limiting counts to certain weather conditions, replication, and distance sampling. Variation in calling rates across a range of bobwhite densities could lead to tenuous inference of population abundance from fall covey counts, particularly at low densities. Our objectives were to assess fall calling rates at 2 sites with low bobwhite density during population restoration. Our study sites were located in Erath County, Texas, USA and Leon County, Florida, USA and received translocated bobwhite during 2019 and 2020. We hypothesized calling rates would be influenced by the number of adjacent coveys that called, and thus, would be low for our sites. Although we did not estimate bobwhite density on our study sites, we surmised that their respective populations were <1 bird/3 ha. Calling rate at the Erath County site was 0 in 2019 (n = 10 counts) and increased to 0.79 (standard error [SE] = 0.07, n = 34 counts) in 2020. Calling rate was assessed only in 2020 at the Leon County site and averaged 0.13 (SE = 0.07, n = 23 counts). Detection rate at count stations was 0 in 2019 and 0.78 (SE = 0.08, n = 27 calling coveys) in 2020 at the Erath County site. In 2020, detection rate at count stations was 0 (n = 3 calling coveys) at the Leon County site. We documented high annual variation in calling rates among low-abundance sites, suggesting researchers should seek to empirically estimate this parameter rather than applying arbitrary correction factors based on previous literature. Low and variable calling rates limit detection and can bias inference. Citation: Palarski, J., S. Simons, B. W. Kubečka, T. M. Terhune II, and G. Hagan. 2022. Highly variable autumn calling rates of northern bobwhite following translocation. National Quail Symposium Proceedings 9:130–135. https://doi.org/10.7290/ nqsp09PDs4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信