跨宗教教育的视角

{"title":"跨宗教教育的视角","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110762877-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of the empirical material revealed different areas of tension in two different settings: the school and the university. Three areas of conflict could be identified and examined in detail in both settings. The first area of conflict in the school setting, referred to as ‘(religious) group dynamics’, covers the tense implications of asymmetric initial conditions, religious boundaries, and the formation of interor intrareligious subgroups. The second area of tension ‘themes and didactics’, focuses on the question of the themes to be dealt with and their preparation and reflects challenges and difficulties in the area of didactics and methodology. It also looks at what is possible in settings of interreligious teaching and learning. At the heart of the third area of conflict in the school setting is the theme of ‘identity and confessionality’. Among other things, the boundaries of interreligious collaboration in educational contexts are negotiated, and the extent to which encounters with the religious other are considered appropriate or counterproductive for the pupils’ identity formation is explored. The university setting revealed three areas of tension as well. The first source of conflict – ‘planning, approaches, and expectations’ – focuses on the conceptualisation and objectives of the university course and reveals different and sometimes contradictory expectations and desires in an interreligious setting. The second area of conflict concerns the ‘process, communication, and group dynamics’ and shows explicit tensions between course teachers as well as between course teachers and students, which were ignited by communication dynamics, competences and responsibilities, or by leadership issues. The third area of conflict focuses on the ‘conflict about “ideal” religious education and recognition’. Here, discrepancies and divergences between the participants were expressed regarding the questions of what constitutes successful religious education, what tasks a religion teacher has to fulfil, and which expectations of the school community need to be met. In the overview of the empirical data, themes that contain conflict potential emerge. They overlap to some extent in the settings, taking up aspects of the sources of conflict and bringing them to an abstract, general level. For the following analysis, seven complex themes were selected: – interaction in interreligious settings – teaching interreligious processes – didactic and methodological approaches – finding and developing themes – interreligious learning in a confessional context","PeriodicalId":123668,"journal":{"name":"Conflicts in Interreligious Education","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"6 Perspectives for Interreligious Education\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110762877-008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evaluation of the empirical material revealed different areas of tension in two different settings: the school and the university. Three areas of conflict could be identified and examined in detail in both settings. The first area of conflict in the school setting, referred to as ‘(religious) group dynamics’, covers the tense implications of asymmetric initial conditions, religious boundaries, and the formation of interor intrareligious subgroups. The second area of tension ‘themes and didactics’, focuses on the question of the themes to be dealt with and their preparation and reflects challenges and difficulties in the area of didactics and methodology. It also looks at what is possible in settings of interreligious teaching and learning. At the heart of the third area of conflict in the school setting is the theme of ‘identity and confessionality’. Among other things, the boundaries of interreligious collaboration in educational contexts are negotiated, and the extent to which encounters with the religious other are considered appropriate or counterproductive for the pupils’ identity formation is explored. The university setting revealed three areas of tension as well. The first source of conflict – ‘planning, approaches, and expectations’ – focuses on the conceptualisation and objectives of the university course and reveals different and sometimes contradictory expectations and desires in an interreligious setting. The second area of conflict concerns the ‘process, communication, and group dynamics’ and shows explicit tensions between course teachers as well as between course teachers and students, which were ignited by communication dynamics, competences and responsibilities, or by leadership issues. The third area of conflict focuses on the ‘conflict about “ideal” religious education and recognition’. Here, discrepancies and divergences between the participants were expressed regarding the questions of what constitutes successful religious education, what tasks a religion teacher has to fulfil, and which expectations of the school community need to be met. In the overview of the empirical data, themes that contain conflict potential emerge. They overlap to some extent in the settings, taking up aspects of the sources of conflict and bringing them to an abstract, general level. For the following analysis, seven complex themes were selected: – interaction in interreligious settings – teaching interreligious processes – didactic and methodological approaches – finding and developing themes – interreligious learning in a confessional context\",\"PeriodicalId\":123668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conflicts in Interreligious Education\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conflicts in Interreligious Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110762877-008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflicts in Interreligious Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110762877-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对经验材料的评估揭示了两种不同环境下的不同紧张领域:学校和大学。在这两种情况下,可以确定和详细审查三个冲突领域。学校环境中的第一个冲突领域,被称为“(宗教)群体动力学”,涵盖了不对称初始条件、宗教边界和宗教内部或宗教内部子群体形成的紧张含义。第二个紧张的领域“主题和教学”,集中在主题的问题要处理和他们的准备,并反映在教学和方法论领域的挑战和困难。它还着眼于在宗教间教学和学习的环境中可能发生的事情。学校环境中第三个冲突领域的核心是“身份和忏悔”的主题。除其他事项外,还讨论了教育背景下宗教间合作的界限,并探讨了与宗教他人的接触在多大程度上被认为是适当的,或者对学生的身份形成起反作用。大学环境也揭示了三个紧张的领域。冲突的第一个来源——“计划、方法和期望”——集中在大学课程的概念化和目标上,揭示了不同的、有时是相互矛盾的期望和愿望。冲突的第二个领域涉及“过程、沟通和群体动力”,并表现出课程教师之间以及课程教师与学生之间的明显紧张关系,这种紧张关系是由沟通动力、能力和责任或领导问题引发的。冲突的第三个领域集中在“关于理想的”宗教教育和认可的冲突”。在这里,与会者之间的差异和分歧是关于什么是成功的宗教教育,宗教教师必须完成什么任务,以及学校社区的期望需要满足的问题。在对实证数据的概述中,出现了包含潜在冲突的主题。它们在某种程度上在背景上重叠,涉及冲突根源的各个方面,并将它们带到抽象的一般水平。为了进行以下分析,选择了七个复杂的主题:-宗教间环境中的相互作用-宗教间过程的教学-教学和方法方法-发现和发展主题-忏悔背景下的宗教间学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
6 Perspectives for Interreligious Education
The evaluation of the empirical material revealed different areas of tension in two different settings: the school and the university. Three areas of conflict could be identified and examined in detail in both settings. The first area of conflict in the school setting, referred to as ‘(religious) group dynamics’, covers the tense implications of asymmetric initial conditions, religious boundaries, and the formation of interor intrareligious subgroups. The second area of tension ‘themes and didactics’, focuses on the question of the themes to be dealt with and their preparation and reflects challenges and difficulties in the area of didactics and methodology. It also looks at what is possible in settings of interreligious teaching and learning. At the heart of the third area of conflict in the school setting is the theme of ‘identity and confessionality’. Among other things, the boundaries of interreligious collaboration in educational contexts are negotiated, and the extent to which encounters with the religious other are considered appropriate or counterproductive for the pupils’ identity formation is explored. The university setting revealed three areas of tension as well. The first source of conflict – ‘planning, approaches, and expectations’ – focuses on the conceptualisation and objectives of the university course and reveals different and sometimes contradictory expectations and desires in an interreligious setting. The second area of conflict concerns the ‘process, communication, and group dynamics’ and shows explicit tensions between course teachers as well as between course teachers and students, which were ignited by communication dynamics, competences and responsibilities, or by leadership issues. The third area of conflict focuses on the ‘conflict about “ideal” religious education and recognition’. Here, discrepancies and divergences between the participants were expressed regarding the questions of what constitutes successful religious education, what tasks a religion teacher has to fulfil, and which expectations of the school community need to be met. In the overview of the empirical data, themes that contain conflict potential emerge. They overlap to some extent in the settings, taking up aspects of the sources of conflict and bringing them to an abstract, general level. For the following analysis, seven complex themes were selected: – interaction in interreligious settings – teaching interreligious processes – didactic and methodological approaches – finding and developing themes – interreligious learning in a confessional context
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信