Ugih Sugiarto, T. Karyani, Dini Rochdiani
{"title":"PANGSA PENGELUARAN PANGAN RUMAH TANGGA PETANI PADI-TERPADU DI KECAMATAN PANGKALAN KABUPATEN KARAWANG","authors":"Ugih Sugiarto, T. Karyani, Dini Rochdiani","doi":"10.33512/JAT.V12I1.5532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify the status of food security of paddy farmer households between monoculture and integrated farmers in Pangkalan District, Karawang Regency. The research was conducted from June to September 2018. This research is quantitative research with survey techniques. The sampling technique in this study was carried out by stratified random sampling . By identifying areas and farmers have potential in rice farming and cattle breeding then selected Tamanmekar village, Tamansari village, and Medalsari village in the Pangkalan district base has the highest number of integrated farming according to data from the initial survey prior to the study. The total number of samples obtained was 107 samples of monoculture farmers and integrated respondents. The number of samples is further divided into the number of respondents of monocultural rice farmers (61 respondents) and integrated farmers (46 respondents). Data analysis uses an analysis of the share of food expenditure and t test to determine the impact of integrated agriculture on household food security. Overall the number of farmer household respondents with the category of food expenditure share <60% or food resistance as many as 69 respondents (64.49%), while the number of households with a share of expenditure ≥ 60% or food insecurity was 38 respondents (35.51%) . The test results of different test using t test showed p-value obtained at 0, 344. When compared with the significant level of 5%, the p-value is greater so it is concluded that it is not there is a difference between the share of agricultural expenditure in the group of monoculture farmers and integrated farmers. It means that integrated farming doesn’t have an impact on food security.","PeriodicalId":352524,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL AGRIBISNIS TERPADU","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL AGRIBISNIS TERPADU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33512/JAT.V12I1.5532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解卡拉旺县邦卡兰区单一种植与综合种植稻田农户的粮食安全状况。该研究于2018年6月至9月进行。本研究采用调查方法进行定量研究。本研究的抽样方法采用分层随机抽样。通过确定在水稻种植和养牛方面具有潜力的地区和农民,根据研究前初步调查的数据,选择Pangkalan地区基地的Tamanmekar村、Tamansari村和Medalsari村的综合农业数量最多。获得的样本总数为107个样本,其中包括单作农户和综合调查对象。样本数量进一步分为单一种植稻农(61名受访者)和综合种植稻农(46名受访者)的受访者数量。数据分析采用粮食支出份额分析和t检验来确定综合农业对家庭粮食安全的影响。总体而言,粮食支出份额<60%或食物抵抗的农户多达69户(64.49%),而支出份额≥60%或粮食不安全的农户有38户(35.51%)。采用t检验不同检验的检验结果显示p值为0,344。与5%的显著水平相比,p值更大,因此可以得出结论,在单一种植户和综合种植户群体中,农业支出份额之间不存在差异。这意味着综合农业对粮食安全没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PANGSA PENGELUARAN PANGAN RUMAH TANGGA PETANI PADI-TERPADU DI KECAMATAN PANGKALAN KABUPATEN KARAWANG
This study aims to identify the status of food security of paddy farmer households between monoculture and integrated farmers in Pangkalan District, Karawang Regency. The research was conducted from June to September 2018. This research is quantitative research with survey techniques. The sampling technique in this study was carried out by stratified random sampling . By identifying areas and farmers have potential in rice farming and cattle breeding then selected Tamanmekar village, Tamansari village, and Medalsari village in the Pangkalan district base has the highest number of integrated farming according to data from the initial survey prior to the study. The total number of samples obtained was 107 samples of monoculture farmers and integrated respondents. The number of samples is further divided into the number of respondents of monocultural rice farmers (61 respondents) and integrated farmers (46 respondents). Data analysis uses an analysis of the share of food expenditure and t test to determine the impact of integrated agriculture on household food security. Overall the number of farmer household respondents with the category of food expenditure share <60% or food resistance as many as 69 respondents (64.49%), while the number of households with a share of expenditure ≥ 60% or food insecurity was 38 respondents (35.51%) . The test results of different test using t test showed p-value obtained at 0, 344. When compared with the significant level of 5%, the p-value is greater so it is concluded that it is not there is a difference between the share of agricultural expenditure in the group of monoculture farmers and integrated farmers. It means that integrated farming doesn’t have an impact on food security.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信