操之过急:过去题的相关性论文

Friday Joseph Umuerhi, Lucky Oghenetega Urhiewhu
{"title":"操之过急:过去题的相关性论文","authors":"Friday Joseph Umuerhi, Lucky Oghenetega Urhiewhu","doi":"10.48165/bpas.2023.43.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the use of past examination question papers (PEQPs) among students and their overall recall  rate during examinations. It employed the descriptive survey research design and used all the 255 undergraduate  students who visit the library in Private Universities such as Novena University Library Ogume, Western Delta  University, Oghara, Michael and Cecilia Ibru University, Library, Agbrha -Otor James Hope University, Edwin  Clak University Library, Kaigbodo; Sports University , Library Idumuje, Ugboko, Margaret Lawrence University,  Umunede Library, and Admirality University of Nigeria, Library Ibusa Ugwashi-Uku for PEQPs. Data for the  study were collected in two phases over a period of two academic semesters with the first phase focusing on respondents’ collection of PEQPs, and the second phase requiring them to complete a questionnaire designed to elicit  information on why they use PEQPs, what they gain and the overall outcome of their reliance on same. The study  found that fresher rely more on (PEQPs), and most students use PEQPs as study guides as against pretesting  themselves before an examination, the respondents do not see reliance on PEQPs as a major factor leading to  improved academic performance of undergraduate students and this affects their perception of the effect PEQPs on  their overall academic outcome. The study therefore concludes that as important as PEQPs usage seems to be,  improper usage of same could be detrimental to the undergraduate users. ","PeriodicalId":155183,"journal":{"name":"Library Progress (International)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jumping the Gun: Relevance of Past Questions Paper\",\"authors\":\"Friday Joseph Umuerhi, Lucky Oghenetega Urhiewhu\",\"doi\":\"10.48165/bpas.2023.43.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the use of past examination question papers (PEQPs) among students and their overall recall  rate during examinations. It employed the descriptive survey research design and used all the 255 undergraduate  students who visit the library in Private Universities such as Novena University Library Ogume, Western Delta  University, Oghara, Michael and Cecilia Ibru University, Library, Agbrha -Otor James Hope University, Edwin  Clak University Library, Kaigbodo; Sports University , Library Idumuje, Ugboko, Margaret Lawrence University,  Umunede Library, and Admirality University of Nigeria, Library Ibusa Ugwashi-Uku for PEQPs. Data for the  study were collected in two phases over a period of two academic semesters with the first phase focusing on respondents’ collection of PEQPs, and the second phase requiring them to complete a questionnaire designed to elicit  information on why they use PEQPs, what they gain and the overall outcome of their reliance on same. The study  found that fresher rely more on (PEQPs), and most students use PEQPs as study guides as against pretesting  themselves before an examination, the respondents do not see reliance on PEQPs as a major factor leading to  improved academic performance of undergraduate students and this affects their perception of the effect PEQPs on  their overall academic outcome. The study therefore concludes that as important as PEQPs usage seems to be,  improper usage of same could be detrimental to the undergraduate users. \",\"PeriodicalId\":155183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Library Progress (International)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Library Progress (International)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48165/bpas.2023.43.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Progress (International)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48165/bpas.2023.43.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了学生在考试过程中对过去考试试题(peqp)的使用情况及其总体回忆率。本研究采用描述性调查研究设计,使用了访问私立大学图书馆的255名本科生,如Novena大学图书馆奥格姆、西三角洲大学奥格哈拉、Michael and Cecilia Ibru大学图书馆、Agbrha -Otor James Hope大学、Edwin Clak大学图书馆、Kaigbodo;体育大学,图书馆Idumuje, Ugboko,玛格丽特劳伦斯大学,Umunede图书馆和尼日利亚海军大学,图书馆Ibusa Ugwashi-Uku的peqp。该研究的数据是在两个学期的时间里分两个阶段收集的,第一阶段侧重于受访者对peqp的收集,第二阶段要求他们完成一份问卷,旨在了解他们为什么使用peqp,他们获得了什么以及他们依赖peqp的总体结果。研究发现,新生更多地依赖于PEQPs,大多数学生使用PEQPs作为学习指南,而不是在考试前进行预考,受访者不认为依赖PEQPs是导致本科学生学习成绩提高的主要因素,这影响了他们对PEQPs对整体学业成绩的影响的看法。因此,该研究得出结论,尽管PEQPs的使用似乎很重要,但不当使用可能对大学生用户有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jumping the Gun: Relevance of Past Questions Paper
This study examined the use of past examination question papers (PEQPs) among students and their overall recall  rate during examinations. It employed the descriptive survey research design and used all the 255 undergraduate  students who visit the library in Private Universities such as Novena University Library Ogume, Western Delta  University, Oghara, Michael and Cecilia Ibru University, Library, Agbrha -Otor James Hope University, Edwin  Clak University Library, Kaigbodo; Sports University , Library Idumuje, Ugboko, Margaret Lawrence University,  Umunede Library, and Admirality University of Nigeria, Library Ibusa Ugwashi-Uku for PEQPs. Data for the  study were collected in two phases over a period of two academic semesters with the first phase focusing on respondents’ collection of PEQPs, and the second phase requiring them to complete a questionnaire designed to elicit  information on why they use PEQPs, what they gain and the overall outcome of their reliance on same. The study  found that fresher rely more on (PEQPs), and most students use PEQPs as study guides as against pretesting  themselves before an examination, the respondents do not see reliance on PEQPs as a major factor leading to  improved academic performance of undergraduate students and this affects their perception of the effect PEQPs on  their overall academic outcome. The study therefore concludes that as important as PEQPs usage seems to be,  improper usage of same could be detrimental to the undergraduate users. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信