{"title":"一项准实验性试点研究,旨在评估压力管理干预措施对泰米尔纳德邦dindigul医院重症监护病房工作人员护士工作压力和应对策略的有效性","authors":"D. Thulasimani Thulasimani, R. Kumari","doi":"10.47211/idcij.2021.v08i01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stress is defined as any event, whether internal or environmental, that exceeds the adaptive or \nresistance resources of individual or social systems. It is a process that involves organic and psychic changes with \nrelevance to the cognitive system and how it interprets different stimuli In dealing with stressful situations, coping \nstrategies are employed in order for adverse events to be experienced more appropriately Methods: The study used \na quasi- experimental with one group pretest and posttest control group design. A total of 30 staff nurses were \nincluded as interventional group (n=15) and control group (n=15) through purposive sampling technique. Stress \nmanagement intervention was given for 1 week and review for another 3 weeks. On the first week of data \ncollection, following the pre- assessment, a detailed lecture was given on stress and coping strategies for seven \nconsecutive days to the interventional group. Followed by this, first post test assessment was done on the seventh \nday to both the groups and reviewed for another 3 consecutive weeks and second posttest assessment was also \ndone flowingly to both the group Data collection tools are(1) demographicvariables,(2) Expanded nurses stress \nscale (3) Ways of Coping scale (4) Stress management intervention programme Result: The overall mean difference \nbetween experimental group posttest-3 (79.33±18.73) and control group posttest -2 (163.53±10.15) group with \nmean difference was 84.2. The obtained ‘t’ value was 15.35 with p=0.001 which was statistically highly significant \ndifference between groups. The overall mean difference between experimental group posttest-3 (129.9±37.24) and \ncontrol group posttest -3 (55.07±6.91) groups with mean difference was 74.87. The obtained ‘t’ value was 7.65 \nwith p=0.001 which was statistically Highly significant difference between groups The result shows that the \nobtained coefficient correlation value in the control ‘r’ =-0.233 and p=0.048 which was statistically","PeriodicalId":417882,"journal":{"name":"IDC International Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL PILOT STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRESS MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS ON JOB STRESS AND COPING STRATEGIES AMONG THE STAFF NURSES WORKING IN CRITICAL CARE UNITS OF SELECTED HOSPITAL AT DINDIGUL IN TAMILNADU\",\"authors\":\"D. Thulasimani Thulasimani, R. Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.47211/idcij.2021.v08i01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stress is defined as any event, whether internal or environmental, that exceeds the adaptive or \\nresistance resources of individual or social systems. It is a process that involves organic and psychic changes with \\nrelevance to the cognitive system and how it interprets different stimuli In dealing with stressful situations, coping \\nstrategies are employed in order for adverse events to be experienced more appropriately Methods: The study used \\na quasi- experimental with one group pretest and posttest control group design. A total of 30 staff nurses were \\nincluded as interventional group (n=15) and control group (n=15) through purposive sampling technique. Stress \\nmanagement intervention was given for 1 week and review for another 3 weeks. On the first week of data \\ncollection, following the pre- assessment, a detailed lecture was given on stress and coping strategies for seven \\nconsecutive days to the interventional group. Followed by this, first post test assessment was done on the seventh \\nday to both the groups and reviewed for another 3 consecutive weeks and second posttest assessment was also \\ndone flowingly to both the group Data collection tools are(1) demographicvariables,(2) Expanded nurses stress \\nscale (3) Ways of Coping scale (4) Stress management intervention programme Result: The overall mean difference \\nbetween experimental group posttest-3 (79.33±18.73) and control group posttest -2 (163.53±10.15) group with \\nmean difference was 84.2. The obtained ‘t’ value was 15.35 with p=0.001 which was statistically highly significant \\ndifference between groups. The overall mean difference between experimental group posttest-3 (129.9±37.24) and \\ncontrol group posttest -3 (55.07±6.91) groups with mean difference was 74.87. The obtained ‘t’ value was 7.65 \\nwith p=0.001 which was statistically Highly significant difference between groups The result shows that the \\nobtained coefficient correlation value in the control ‘r’ =-0.233 and p=0.048 which was statistically\",\"PeriodicalId\":417882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IDC International Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IDC International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47211/idcij.2021.v08i01.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDC International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47211/idcij.2021.v08i01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL PILOT STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRESS MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS ON JOB STRESS AND COPING STRATEGIES AMONG THE STAFF NURSES WORKING IN CRITICAL CARE UNITS OF SELECTED HOSPITAL AT DINDIGUL IN TAMILNADU
Stress is defined as any event, whether internal or environmental, that exceeds the adaptive or
resistance resources of individual or social systems. It is a process that involves organic and psychic changes with
relevance to the cognitive system and how it interprets different stimuli In dealing with stressful situations, coping
strategies are employed in order for adverse events to be experienced more appropriately Methods: The study used
a quasi- experimental with one group pretest and posttest control group design. A total of 30 staff nurses were
included as interventional group (n=15) and control group (n=15) through purposive sampling technique. Stress
management intervention was given for 1 week and review for another 3 weeks. On the first week of data
collection, following the pre- assessment, a detailed lecture was given on stress and coping strategies for seven
consecutive days to the interventional group. Followed by this, first post test assessment was done on the seventh
day to both the groups and reviewed for another 3 consecutive weeks and second posttest assessment was also
done flowingly to both the group Data collection tools are(1) demographicvariables,(2) Expanded nurses stress
scale (3) Ways of Coping scale (4) Stress management intervention programme Result: The overall mean difference
between experimental group posttest-3 (79.33±18.73) and control group posttest -2 (163.53±10.15) group with
mean difference was 84.2. The obtained ‘t’ value was 15.35 with p=0.001 which was statistically highly significant
difference between groups. The overall mean difference between experimental group posttest-3 (129.9±37.24) and
control group posttest -3 (55.07±6.91) groups with mean difference was 74.87. The obtained ‘t’ value was 7.65
with p=0.001 which was statistically Highly significant difference between groups The result shows that the
obtained coefficient correlation value in the control ‘r’ =-0.233 and p=0.048 which was statistically