俄罗斯与立陶宛政党制度发展的比较分析

I. Ivanov, V. Volovoj
{"title":"俄罗斯与立陶宛政党制度发展的比较分析","authors":"I. Ivanov, V. Volovoj","doi":"10.15535/262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the basis of factors such as ideology, the degree of populism, political leadership and form of the government a complex comparativeanalysis of the formation and development of the party system in Lithuania and Russia in the post-communist period wascarried out. Summing up, it should be noted that both Russian and Lithuanian party parliamentarism are being progressively consolidated.At the same time they continue to suffer from many shortcomings owing to negative historical heritage, characterized byauthoritarian single-party system, cult of the leader, ideological populism and undeveloped civil society, and also because of theprolonged transition period of young democracies. Speaking about the prospects of the development of the party systems of twocountries, it can be assumed that in the medium term the current situation should not change dramatically. On the basis of factors such as ideology, the degree of populism, political leadership and form of the government a complex comparativeanalysis of the formation and development of the party system in Lithuania and Russia in the post-communist period wascarried out. Summing up, it should be noted that both Russian and Lithuanian party parliamentarism are being progressively consolidated.At the same time they continue to suffer from many shortcomings owing to negative historical heritage, characterized byauthoritarian single-party system, cult of the leader, ideological populism and undeveloped civil society, and also because of theprolonged transition period of young democracies. Speaking about the prospects of the development of the party systems of twocountries, it can be assumed that in the medium term the current situation should not change dramatically.","PeriodicalId":375014,"journal":{"name":"Russian Academic Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the Party Systems Development in Russia and Lithuania\",\"authors\":\"I. Ivanov, V. Volovoj\",\"doi\":\"10.15535/262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the basis of factors such as ideology, the degree of populism, political leadership and form of the government a complex comparativeanalysis of the formation and development of the party system in Lithuania and Russia in the post-communist period wascarried out. Summing up, it should be noted that both Russian and Lithuanian party parliamentarism are being progressively consolidated.At the same time they continue to suffer from many shortcomings owing to negative historical heritage, characterized byauthoritarian single-party system, cult of the leader, ideological populism and undeveloped civil society, and also because of theprolonged transition period of young democracies. Speaking about the prospects of the development of the party systems of twocountries, it can be assumed that in the medium term the current situation should not change dramatically. On the basis of factors such as ideology, the degree of populism, political leadership and form of the government a complex comparativeanalysis of the formation and development of the party system in Lithuania and Russia in the post-communist period wascarried out. Summing up, it should be noted that both Russian and Lithuanian party parliamentarism are being progressively consolidated.At the same time they continue to suffer from many shortcomings owing to negative historical heritage, characterized byauthoritarian single-party system, cult of the leader, ideological populism and undeveloped civil society, and also because of theprolonged transition period of young democracies. Speaking about the prospects of the development of the party systems of twocountries, it can be assumed that in the medium term the current situation should not change dramatically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Academic Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Academic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15535/262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Academic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15535/262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于意识形态、民粹主义程度、政治领导和政府形式等因素,对后共产主义时期立陶宛和俄罗斯政党制度的形成与发展进行了复杂的比较分析。总之,应该指出的是,俄罗斯和立陶宛的政党议会制都在逐步巩固。与此同时,由于负面的历史遗产,它们继续遭受许多缺点,其特点是专制的一党制度,对领导人的崇拜,意识形态的民粹主义和不发达的公民社会,也因为年轻的民主国家的漫长过渡期。谈到两国政党制度的发展前景,可以认为,从中期来看,目前的情况不会有太大的变化。基于意识形态、民粹主义程度、政治领导和政府形式等因素,对后共产主义时期立陶宛和俄罗斯政党制度的形成与发展进行了复杂的比较分析。总之,应该指出的是,俄罗斯和立陶宛的政党议会制都在逐步巩固。与此同时,由于负面的历史遗产,它们继续遭受许多缺点,其特点是专制的一党制度,对领导人的崇拜,意识形态的民粹主义和不发达的公民社会,也因为年轻的民主国家的漫长过渡期。谈到两国政党制度的发展前景,可以认为,从中期来看,目前的情况不会有太大的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of the Party Systems Development in Russia and Lithuania
On the basis of factors such as ideology, the degree of populism, political leadership and form of the government a complex comparativeanalysis of the formation and development of the party system in Lithuania and Russia in the post-communist period wascarried out. Summing up, it should be noted that both Russian and Lithuanian party parliamentarism are being progressively consolidated.At the same time they continue to suffer from many shortcomings owing to negative historical heritage, characterized byauthoritarian single-party system, cult of the leader, ideological populism and undeveloped civil society, and also because of theprolonged transition period of young democracies. Speaking about the prospects of the development of the party systems of twocountries, it can be assumed that in the medium term the current situation should not change dramatically. On the basis of factors such as ideology, the degree of populism, political leadership and form of the government a complex comparativeanalysis of the formation and development of the party system in Lithuania and Russia in the post-communist period wascarried out. Summing up, it should be noted that both Russian and Lithuanian party parliamentarism are being progressively consolidated.At the same time they continue to suffer from many shortcomings owing to negative historical heritage, characterized byauthoritarian single-party system, cult of the leader, ideological populism and undeveloped civil society, and also because of theprolonged transition period of young democracies. Speaking about the prospects of the development of the party systems of twocountries, it can be assumed that in the medium term the current situation should not change dramatically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信