论柯契安玛雅语的完全时相:LFG方法

L. Duncan
{"title":"论柯契安玛雅语的完全时相:LFG方法","authors":"L. Duncan","doi":"10.21248/hpsg.2016.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPrevious accounts of the\nperfect tense-aspect in the K'ichee'an languages have concluded that\nthe category or part-of-speech of the perfect is a verb, or less\noften, a participle. We believe otherwise. Empirical support is\npresented for the hypothesis that the perfect is expressed using\neither a deverbal participial adjective or a deverbal possessed\nnominal in the form of a detransitivized non-verbal predicate. We show\nthat the perfect always consists of a one-place intransitive but that\nit, nonetheless, retains the capacity to express two argument\nroles. Further, we argue that the perfect is, in fact, a perfect. We\npresent the various semantic types of perfect, including the perfect\nof result and the experiential perfect, and also show the temporal\nrestrictions that constrain the perfect. The analyses are implemented\nusing the syntactic architecture of LFG.","PeriodicalId":388937,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the perfect tense-aspect in K'ichee'an Mayan: An LFG approach\",\"authors\":\"L. Duncan\",\"doi\":\"10.21248/hpsg.2016.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPrevious accounts of the\\nperfect tense-aspect in the K'ichee'an languages have concluded that\\nthe category or part-of-speech of the perfect is a verb, or less\\noften, a participle. We believe otherwise. Empirical support is\\npresented for the hypothesis that the perfect is expressed using\\neither a deverbal participial adjective or a deverbal possessed\\nnominal in the form of a detransitivized non-verbal predicate. We show\\nthat the perfect always consists of a one-place intransitive but that\\nit, nonetheless, retains the capacity to express two argument\\nroles. Further, we argue that the perfect is, in fact, a perfect. We\\npresent the various semantic types of perfect, including the perfect\\nof result and the experiential perfect, and also show the temporal\\nrestrictions that constrain the perfect. The analyses are implemented\\nusing the syntactic architecture of LFG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

以前对汉语中完成时的描述已经得出结论:完成时的范畴或词性是动词,或者更少地是分词。我们不这么认为。本文提供了经验支持的假设,即完成时要么是用动词分词形容词来表达,要么是用非动词谓语的非及物化形式来表达。我们表明完成时总是由一个单位不及物组成,但它仍然保留了表达两个论点角色的能力。此外,我们认为完成时实际上就是完成时。我们介绍了完成时的各种语义类型,包括结果完成时和经验完成时,并说明了约束完成时的时间限制。分析使用LFG的语法体系结构来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the perfect tense-aspect in K'ichee'an Mayan: An LFG approach
Previous accounts of the perfect tense-aspect in the K'ichee'an languages have concluded that the category or part-of-speech of the perfect is a verb, or less often, a participle. We believe otherwise. Empirical support is presented for the hypothesis that the perfect is expressed using either a deverbal participial adjective or a deverbal possessed nominal in the form of a detransitivized non-verbal predicate. We show that the perfect always consists of a one-place intransitive but that it, nonetheless, retains the capacity to express two argument roles. Further, we argue that the perfect is, in fact, a perfect. We present the various semantic types of perfect, including the perfect of result and the experiential perfect, and also show the temporal restrictions that constrain the perfect. The analyses are implemented using the syntactic architecture of LFG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信