{"title":"论柯契安玛雅语的完全时相:LFG方法","authors":"L. Duncan","doi":"10.21248/hpsg.2016.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPrevious accounts of the\nperfect tense-aspect in the K'ichee'an languages have concluded that\nthe category or part-of-speech of the perfect is a verb, or less\noften, a participle. We believe otherwise. Empirical support is\npresented for the hypothesis that the perfect is expressed using\neither a deverbal participial adjective or a deverbal possessed\nnominal in the form of a detransitivized non-verbal predicate. We show\nthat the perfect always consists of a one-place intransitive but that\nit, nonetheless, retains the capacity to express two argument\nroles. Further, we argue that the perfect is, in fact, a perfect. We\npresent the various semantic types of perfect, including the perfect\nof result and the experiential perfect, and also show the temporal\nrestrictions that constrain the perfect. The analyses are implemented\nusing the syntactic architecture of LFG.","PeriodicalId":388937,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the perfect tense-aspect in K'ichee'an Mayan: An LFG approach\",\"authors\":\"L. Duncan\",\"doi\":\"10.21248/hpsg.2016.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPrevious accounts of the\\nperfect tense-aspect in the K'ichee'an languages have concluded that\\nthe category or part-of-speech of the perfect is a verb, or less\\noften, a participle. We believe otherwise. Empirical support is\\npresented for the hypothesis that the perfect is expressed using\\neither a deverbal participial adjective or a deverbal possessed\\nnominal in the form of a detransitivized non-verbal predicate. We show\\nthat the perfect always consists of a one-place intransitive but that\\nit, nonetheless, retains the capacity to express two argument\\nroles. Further, we argue that the perfect is, in fact, a perfect. We\\npresent the various semantic types of perfect, including the perfect\\nof result and the experiential perfect, and also show the temporal\\nrestrictions that constrain the perfect. The analyses are implemented\\nusing the syntactic architecture of LFG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the perfect tense-aspect in K'ichee'an Mayan: An LFG approach
Previous accounts of the
perfect tense-aspect in the K'ichee'an languages have concluded that
the category or part-of-speech of the perfect is a verb, or less
often, a participle. We believe otherwise. Empirical support is
presented for the hypothesis that the perfect is expressed using
either a deverbal participial adjective or a deverbal possessed
nominal in the form of a detransitivized non-verbal predicate. We show
that the perfect always consists of a one-place intransitive but that
it, nonetheless, retains the capacity to express two argument
roles. Further, we argue that the perfect is, in fact, a perfect. We
present the various semantic types of perfect, including the perfect
of result and the experiential perfect, and also show the temporal
restrictions that constrain the perfect. The analyses are implemented
using the syntactic architecture of LFG.